+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

A result-based approach in the public sector in the context of budget risks

Vol. 7, Iss. 42, NOVEMBER 2014

Available online: 3 November 2014

Subject Heading: BUDGETARY REFORM

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 56-67

Istomina N.A. Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
n_istomina_usue@mail.ru

Importance Due to the growing importance of the result-based technology for the functioning of a budget system, studying the problems that can neutralize the possible (desired) positive effects of implementation of a result-based approach assumes the prominence in the activities of authorities, management, institutions and organizations. The fiscal risks deserve special consideration.
     Objectives A wide range of constraints or risks in the budgetary system of any country makes a significant impact on the implementation of any budget reform. Certainly, it concerns the reform implemented in our country as result-oriented budgeting, or the result-based approach.
     Methods Quantitative evaluation of the probability of budgetary change risk is based on the traditional grouping of economic development stages. In terms of economic growth, or economic downturn, the situations of reduction or increase of income to the budget, change of prices of goods, and works, will always prevail. In particular, it concerns the services tariffs for natural monopolies, necessitating to make adjustments to the budgetary parameters, and therefore, to the results of public funded programs. In this situation, the probability of budgetary changes risk is considered as rather high. Within the framework of the ideology of the result-oriented budgeting, I propose to consider budgetary risks as a complex phenomenon caused by an internal logic of budgeting, which makes it is impossible to achieve the planned results.
     Results Therefore, there is a need to review the originally established types of the results and the need to change the quantity parameters of planned results. In the article, I research influence of result-oriented budgeting.
     Conclusions and Relevance I give recommendations to improve the activities of the power and administration authorities, aimed at budgeting of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: result-based approach, budget, budget planning, risk, deficit, inter-budgetary relations, legislation, changes

References:

  1. Baksha N.V., Gamukin V.V., Svintsova A.P. Aspekty byudzheta: imperativnyi, ekonomicheskii, finansovyi, nalogovyi, raskhodnyi, sotsial'nyi [Aspects of budget: mandatory, economic, financial, tax, expenditure, and social ones]. Moscow, Profizdat Publ., 2001, 416 p.
  2. Gamukin V.V. Byudzhetnye riski: vvedenie v obshchuyu aksiomatiku [Budgetary risks: an introduction to general axiomatics]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2013, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 52–61.
  3. Gorokhova D.V. Upravlenie byudzhetnymi riskami sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii na sovremennom etape upravleniya gosudarstvennymi finansami [Budgetary risks management of the subjects of the Russian Federation at the present stage of public finance management]. Upravlenie riskom – Risk management, 2013, no. 1, pp. 22–27.
  4. Gorokhova D.V. Istoriya stanovleniya i sovremennyi vzglyad na upravlenie byudzhetnymi riskami sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [History of formation and modern look at budgetary risk management of the subjects of the Russian Federation]. RISK: Resursy, Informatsiya, Snabzhenie, Konkurentsiya – RISC: Resources, Information, Supplies, Competition, 2012, no. 3, pp. 180–185.
  5. Ermakova E.A. Problemy upravleniya regional'nymi byudzhetnymi riskami [The problems of regional budgetary risks management]. Regional'naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii – Regional economics. South of Russia, 2013, no. 1, pp. 33–39.
  6. Kantor O.G. Klassifikatsiya metodov kolichestvennoi otsenki ekonomicheskogo riska [Classification of quantitative assessment methods of economic risk]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  7. Solomko I.M., Solomko M.N. Otsenka riskov byudzhetnogo protsessa: teoreticheskii aspect [The budgetary process risk assessment: a theoretical perspective]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  8. Tishutina O.I. Byudzhetnaya strategiya prigranichnogo sub"ekta RF [Budgetary strategy for the near-border territorial entity of the Russian Federation]. Irkutsk, BSUEL Publ., 2007, 272 p.
  9. Yanov V.V. Substantsiya byudzhetnogo riska: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty [The substance of budgetary risk: theoretical and methodological aspects]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola – Siberian financial school, 2012, no. 6, pp. 96–101.
  10. Yanov V.V. Byudzhetnye riski munitsipal'nykh obrazovanii: soderzhanie metodov otsenki [Budgetary risks of municipal entities: the content of evaluation methods]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: novye vyzovy i perspektivy – Economics and management: new challenges and perspectives, 2011, no. 2, pp. 324–327.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive