+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Benefits of public-private partnership mechanisms for the social sector projects in foreign countries

Vol. 7, Iss. 41, NOVEMBER 2014

Available online: 3 November 2014

Subject Heading: SOCIAL FINANCE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 29-38

Gosteva N.A. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
natagost@gmail.com

Vyalkin A.G. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Мoscow, Russian Federation
vyalkin@tpprf.ru

Importance In foreign countries, the role of public-private partnership is especially important in the implementation of the most expensive and long-term infrastructure projects. Like in the Russian Federation, the construction of toll roads, urban transport development, construction of marine terminal facilities, reconstruction of airports, railway construction in the areas of natural resources development, creation of complex information systems for cargo management, etc., have become the main scope of the public-private partnership scheme application, i.e. most of them are concentrated in the area of infrastructure. The social sector, at the present time, is experiencing significant demand for financial resources, and for introduction of modern management methods, advanced technologies of service rendering and maintenance. Budgetary and extra-budgetary funds, targeted funding resources do not allow meeting these requirements to full extent, since it requires direct attraction of the private sector competency and investment.
     Objectives The purpose of the article is to consider foreign business structures and power institutions in their interaction within the framework of implementation of investment projects of state-private partnership in the social services and distribution of the corresponding risks.
     Methods By means of structurally functional and comparative analyses, methods of comparison and groups, we have researched the main trends of use of the public-private partnership mechanism for the development of investment activity in the social services in foreign countries.
     Results The findings of the article concern the development of recommendations for formation of an institutional base of use of state-private partnership mechanisms for implementation of investment projects in the social sphere.
     Conclusions and Relevance We came to a conclusion that successful implementation of public investment projects in the social services directly depends on the quality of management, namely, on the efficiency of interaction between the public power bodies on their development and realization. The unconsidered and insufficiently weighed investment decisions may not only lead to inefficient use of budgetary funds, but also undermine trust to the public power, damage the potential growth of investment in the social services branch.

Keywords: public-private partnership, investment activity, project financing, analysis, risk

References:

  1. Materialy zasedaniya podkomiteta Torgovo-promyshlennoi palaty RF po gosudarstvenno-chastnomu partnerstvu, Moskva, 22 aprelya 2014 [Proceedings of the subcommittee session of the Chamber of Commerce and Trade of the Russian Federation on the public-private partnership issues, Moscow, April 22, 2014]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  2. Materialy kruglogo stola “Strategiya innovatsionnogo razvitiya: prioritety investirovaniya”. Peterburgskii mezhdunarodnyi ekonomicheskii forum. S.-Peterburg, 23 maya 2014 g [Proc. Int. Econ. Forum: Round table materials "Strategy of innovative development: investment priorities"]. St. Petersburg, 2014, May 23. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  3. Mekhanizm kontsessii i drugie instrumenty gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva pri sozdanii i razvitii infrastruktury osobykh ekonomicheskikh zon: monografiya [A mechanism of concession and other instruments of public-private partnership in creation and development of the special economic zones infrastructure: a monograph]. Moscow, Financial University Publ., 2012, 146 p.
  4. Bartosz Mysiorski. Emerging PPP market experience: lessons learned by Poland and CEE & SEE regions. National Seminar: Substantive Segment on Financing Innovative Green Technology Projects through Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). Kazakhstan, Astana, October, 2013.
  5. Best International Practices in PPP with Regards to Regional Policy Issues. USA, Washington, D.C., EBRD, 2005.
  6. Infrastructure 2013: Global Priorities, Global Insights. USA, Washington, D.C., Urban Land Institute, 2013.
  7. Lee Mizell, Dorothée Allain-Dupré. Creating Conditions for Effective Public Investment, Sub-National Capacities in a Multi-level Governance Context. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2013, no. 04.
  8. OECD annual meeting of senior PPP officials: Overview of global PPP markets. PWC, 2013.
  9. PPP projects in the education sector. Key principles. Hogan Lovells Associated Offices, 2011.
  10. Review of the European PPP Market. Luxembourg, EPEC, 2014.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive