+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

A critical review of main methods of goodwill valuation of non-public companies applied in the planning of M&A transactions

Vol. 7, Iss. 38, OCTOBER 2014

Available online: 12 October 2014

Subject Heading: BUSINESS ASSESSMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 31-41

Ivanov A.E. South Ural State University - National Research University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
ivanov.chel@list.ru

The valuation of goodwill while planning mergers and acquisitions is a major procedure, which enables an investor to determine the maximum amount of the excess price of the acquired company over the value of its net assets, which is reasonable to spend. At the present time, there is no uniform methodology for such a valuation. For companies, the shares of which are listed on the stock exchange, the valuation of goodwill can be determined based on the quoted market prices of the shares. The non-public companies, as a rule, tend to use the methods based on the use of the income approach to business valuation in its pure form, or a combination of the income approach methodology with individual instruments of the comparative and cost approaches. The article describes the four most common methods of valuation of goodwill for non-public companies: the method of excess earnings; the leverage method; the relief from royalty method, and the method based on the Edwards-Bell-Ohlson model. The author highlighted the common mistakes that frequently appear in the domestic scientific literature in the description of some of these methods, and he identified the advantages and disadvantages of each method, as well as provided the expert opinions regarding their applicability in the valuation practice. The autor arrived at a conclusion that there was a general shortcoming in all methods of valuation of goodwill of non-public companies that are used in the planning of integration transactions: they allow only a certain degree of accuracy to valuate the size of goodwill, but do not explain at what cost it was created ("black box"). The paper formulates the direction of further research of the author: the construction of the model allowing to give such an explanation, and to evaluate the contribution of each element of the goodwill in its aggregate value.

Keywords: goodwill, synergetic effect, synergy, business valuation, integration, mergers and acquisitions

References:

  1. Generalova N.V., Sokolova N.A. Gudvill v finansovoi otchetnosti po MSFO [Goodwill in IFRS financial statements]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchetInternational accounting, 2013, no. 16, pp. 16–28.
  2. Generalova N.V., Sokolova N.A. Uchet obestseneniya aktivov na primere obestseneniya gudvilla kak oblast' primeneniya professional'nogo suzhdeniya [Accounting of impairment of assets as the case of goodwill impairment as the field of professional judgment application]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchetInternational accounting, 2014, no. 26, pp. 2–14.
  3. Gerasimov N.N. Primenenie modeli Ol'sona v otsenke stoimosti kompanii [An application of the Olson model in the valuation of a company]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  4. Eliseev V.M. Gudvill: problema otsenki i otrazheniya v otchetnosti [Goodwill: the problem of evaluation and reflection in accounting]. Voprosy otsenki – Evaluation issues, 2004, no. 1, pp. 31–37.
  5. Ivanov A.E. Delovaya reputatsiya kompanii (gudvil) kak proektsiya sinergeticheskogo effekta ee deyatel'nosti na finansovuyu otchetnost' [The business reputation of the company (goodwill) as a projection of the synergistic effects of its activities on the financial statements]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchetInternational accounting, 2013, no. 34, pp. 18–26.
  6. Ivanov A.E., Salomatina E.Yu. Gudvill v finansovoi otchetnosti: sravnitel'nyi analiz natsional'nykh norm [Goodwill in the financial statements: a comparative analysis of the national standards]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchetInternational accounting, 2014, no. 12, pp. 16–25.
  7. Pratt S. Otsenivaya biznes: analiz i otsenka kompanii zakrytogo tipa [Valuing a Business: The Analysis and Appraisal of Closely Held Companies]. Moscow, World Bank's Economic Development Institute Publ., 1994, 234 p.
  8. Samsonov V., Kharchenko S. Kak otsenit' gudvil? [How to evaluate the goodwill?]. Finansovyi direktor – Financial director, 2004, no. 2, pp. 36–42.
  9. Sokolov Ya.V., Pyatov M.L. Gudvil: “novaya” kategoriya bukhgalterskogo ucheta [Goodwill: a “new” category of accounting]. Bukhgalterskii uchetAccounting, 1997, no. 2, pp. 46–50.
  10. Spravochnik raschetnykh dannykh dlya otsenki i konsaltinga (SRD No. 6) [Data book of estimates for appraisal and consulting (Collection of instruction documents No. 6)]. Moscow, Nauchno-prakticheskii tsentr professional'nykh otsenshchikov Publ., 2010, 50 p.
  11. Frolova N.V., Kharitonova T.B. Otsenka stoimosti kompanii s ispol'zovaniem modeli Edvardsa – Bella – Ol'sona [A company valuation using the Edwards – Bell – Olson model]. Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami – Managing large systems, 2006, no. 14, pp. 55–62.
  12. Alerding R.J. The Excess Earnings Method. A BVR Webinar Handbook, February 14, 2013, 36 p.
  13. Explanation of the methodology. Brand Finance. Available at: Link.
  14. Francis J., Olsson P., Oswald D. Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 2000, Spring, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 45–70.
  15. Methodology. Interbrand. Available at: Link.
  16. Ohlson J.A. Earnings, Book Values and Dividends in Securities Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1995, Spring, no. 11, pp. 661–687.
  17. Penman S.H., Sougiannis T. A comparison of dividend, cash flows, and earnings approaches to equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1998, Fall, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 343–383.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive