+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Development of a model for optimizing economic instruments of environmental policy for territories with a special environmental management regime

ISSUE 4, APRIL 2026

Received: 30 January 2026

Accepted: 13 March 2026

Available online: 29 April 2026

Subject Heading: INTEGRATED ECONOMIC-SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

JEL Classification: D63, Q20, Q28, Q56

Pages: 166-179

https://doi.org/10.24891/hfrhxo

Natal'ya B. LUBSANOVA Baikal Institute of Nature Management of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (BINM SB RAS), Ulan-Ude, Republic of Buryatia, Russian Federation
nlub@binm.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-2555

Subject. Improving the effectiveness of environmental policy in territories with a special environmental management regime, which are characterized by a lower stimulating potential of traditional market mechanisms.
Objectives. Development of a methodology for allocating limited budget funds between key economic instruments to maximize eco-efficiency and socio-ecological and economic sustainability.
Methods. A formalized optimization model is proposed for allocating limited budget funds between key economic instruments to maximize two targets – eco-efficiency and socio-ecological and economic sustainability, taking into account synergetic effects and budget constraints.
Results. Practical testing of the model based on data from the Republic of Buryatia for 2025-2027 revealed that the maximum cumulative effect on the target indicators of eco-efficiency and socio-ecological and economic sustainability is achieved by redistributing costs in favor of targeted subsidies that stimulate environmental modernization.
Conclusions. Based on the calculation results, the need for a transition from direct budget financing to a mechanism for stimulating market demand for environmental technologies through targeted subsidies is substantiated. For territories with a special nature management regime, this approach creates conditions for preserving natural capital while ensuring sustainable socioeconomic development.

Keywords: environmental policy, special nature management regime, Republic of Buryatia, eco-efficiency, multi-criteria optimization

References:

  1. Levin S., Xepapadeas A. On the coevolution of economic and ecological systems. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2021, vol. 13, pp. 355–377. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-103020-083100
  2. Anisimov A.P., Charkin S.A. [Legal regime territories with special environmental and legal status and the issues of its improvement]. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava, 2013, no. 2, pp. 26–31. (In Russ.) EDN: PYFXNJ
  3. Tulokhonov A.K. [Baikal on the scales of economics and ecology]. EKO, 2022, no. 8, pp. 8–23. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-8-8-23 EDN: ROISWG
  4. Goulder L.H., Parry I.W.H. Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008, vol. 2(2), pp. 152–174. DOI: 10.1093/reep/ren005
  5. Pearce D.W., Turner R.K. Economics of natural resources and the environment. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf; New York, E. Elgar, 1990, 378 p.
  6. Caselli G., Iori M., Ljubic I. Bilevel optimization with sustainability perspective: a survey on applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 2025, vol. 325, iss. 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.08.051
  7. Liu Keyi, Chen Yufeng, Xu Liyan et al. Reconciling human development and giant panda protection goals: cost-efficiency evaluation of farmland reverting and energy substitution programs in Wolong National Reserve. arXiv, 2024. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.07275
  8. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, vol. 130, iss. 3, pp. 498–509. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
  9. Lubsanova N.B. Assessment of the eco-efficiency of the development of the regions of North Asia based on impact decoupling. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 2024, vol. 19(8), pp. 26–38. DOI: 10.46754/jssm.2024.08.003
  10. Malysheva O.V., Arkad'eva O.G. [Fiscal efficiency of payment for negative environmental impact]. Oeconomia et Jus, 2022, no. 3, pp. 15–24. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.47026/2499-9636-2022-3-15-24 EDN: QBEBCX
  11. Ziranova S.N. [Ecological and fiscal efficiency of payment for negative impact on the environment]. Zhurnal prikladnykh issledovanii, 2018, no. 3, pp. 22–26. (In Russ.) EDN: BFVMCC
  12. García-Ayllón S. New Strategies to Improve Co-Management in Enclosed Coastal Seas and Wetlands Subjected to Complex Environments: Socio-Economic Analysis Applied to an International Recovery Success Case Study after an Environmental Crisis. Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11(4), no. 1039. DOI: 10.3390/su11041039
  13. Day B., Mancini M., Bateman I.J. et al. Natural capital approaches for the optimal design of policies for nature recovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2024, vol. 379. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0327

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

ISSUE 4
APRIL 2026

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!