+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Corporate governance in the context of the ESG agenda: Industry ratings of companies

ISSUE 12, DECEMBER 2025

Received: 23 July 2025

Accepted: 30 August 2025

Available online: 16 December 2025

Subject Heading: BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

JEL Classification: G32, M14, Q56

Pages: 91-102

https://doi.org/10.24891/rxipdv

Elena A. FEDOROVA Corresponding author, Institute of Financial and Industrial Policy, Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
ecolena@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-6116

Elizaveta V. MEDVEDEVA Institute of Financial and Industrial Policy, Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
medv.liza70@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-1326

Igor' S. DEMIN Institute of Financial and Industrial Policy, Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
ig.demin@gmail.com

ORCID id: not available

Subject. The article addresses corporate governance in the context of the ESG agenda, industry ratings of companies.
Objectives. The study aims to carry out a comprehensive analysis of the dynamics and industry differentiation of the corporate governance index among Russian companies, identify the key factors influencing its change.
Methods. The study employs the text mining method to process data on a sample of 132 Russian companies for 2014–2023, natural language processing (NLP) methods, including lexical approaches and machine learning, the Latent Dirichlet Allocation, a statistical thematic modeling method that is used to extract hidden topics from large sets of text data.
Results. We established a steady upward trend in the corporate governance index 2020. The categories of "information disclosure" and "risk management" showed the greatest growth. The leading positions were taken by companies in the metallurgical and gold mining sectors, such as Severstal and Buryatzoloto. This indicates their adaptability to changes in the regulatory environment and the introduction of best practices.
Conclusions. The study confirms the hypothesis about positive impact of the quality of corporate governance on the adaptive potential of companies. The revealed industry differentiation highlights the need to consider the specifics of sectors when developing ESG strategies. The findings can be used by companies to optimize corporate practices, taking into account industry specifics, by investors to assess ESG risks, and by regulatory authorities to develop standards for sustainable development.

Keywords: ESG ratings, text analysis, corporate governance, sustainable development, industry ratings

References:

  1. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, Pitman, 1984, 276 p.
  2. Tricker B. Corporate Governance: Practices, Procedures and Powers in British Companies and their Boards of Directors. Gower Pub. Co., 1984, 319 p.
  3. Brown L.D., Caylor M.L. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. SSRN Working Paper, 2004, 73 p. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.586423
  4. Caporale G.M., Gil-Alana L., Plastun A., Makarenko I. Persistence in ESG and conventional stock market indices. Journal of Economics and Finance, 2022, vol. 46, iss. 3, pp. 678–703. DOI: 10.1007/s12197-022-09580-0
  5. Berg F., Kölbel J.F., Rigobon R. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 2022, vol. 26, iss. 6, pp. 1315–1344. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfac033
  6. Xiaomin Bao, Muhammad Sadiq, Weiling Tye, Jing Zhang. The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating disparities on corporate risk: The mediating role of financing constraints. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, vol. 371, no. 123113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123113
  7. Loughran T., McDonald B. Measuring Firm Complexity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2024, vol. 59, iss. 6, pp. 2487–2514. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109023000716
  8. Izza N.N., Sari M., Kahila M., Al-Ayubi S. A Twitter sentiments analysis on Islamic banking using Drone Emprit Academic (DEA): Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 2023, vol. 10, iss. 5, pp. 496–510. DOI: 10.20473/vol10iss20235pp496-510
  9. Loughran T., McDonald B. Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 2016, vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 1187–1230. DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12123
  10. Yi Zou, Mengying Shi, Zhongjie Chen et al. ESGReveal: An LLM-based approach for extracting structured data from ESG reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2025, vol. 489, no. 144572. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144572
  11. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, vol. 48, iss. 2, pp. 147–160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101
  12. Lin Liao, Le Luo, Qingliang Tang. Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 2015, vol. 47, iss. 4, pp. 409–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
  13. Jinhuan Tian, Yan Dong, Vagnani G., Peizhong Liu. Green innovation and the stock market value of heavily polluting firms: The role of environmental compliance costs and technological collaboration. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, vol. 32, iss. 7, pp. 4938–4953. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3401
  14. Wan Masliza Wan Mohammad, Shaista Wasiuzzaman. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2021, vol. 2, iss. 4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

ISSUE 12
DECEMBER 2025

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!