+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

A methodology to assess the maturity level of the digital ecosystem and its testing on the IT parks case

Vol. 23, Iss. 9, SEPTEMBER 2024

Received: 27 June 2024

Received in revised form: 7 July 2024

Accepted: 21 July 2024

Available online: 30 September 2024

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: L26, P51, R12

Pages: 1610-1630

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.23.9.1610

Vilena A. YAKIMOVA Amur State University (AmSU), Blagoveshchensk, Amur Oblast, Russian Federation
vilena_yakimova@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5866-5652

Sergei V. KHMURA Amur State University (AmSU), Blagoveshchensk, Amur Oblast, Russian Federation
sergey.khmura@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0704-8755

Subject. The article addresses a technopark as a form of a digital ecosystem that has a certain structure and is characterized by the features of structural components and their interrelationships.
Objectives. The study aims to develop a methodology for assessing the maturity level of digital ecosystem, which enables to determine the stage of ecosystem's life cycle and the level of its development.
Methods. The assessment rests on the developed multifactorial methodology. It includes three interrelated complex parameters (resource and infrastructure security, the level of development of central relational mechanisms, and ecosystem productivity). The methodology is based on methods of scoring and identifying correlation between indicators characterizing the maturity level of each component of the ecosystem.
Results. From a theoretical perspective, we developed an assessment methodology. It is unique in its multifactorial and structural approach to assessing the maturity of ecosystems. From a practical point of view, we built ratings of IT parks, which clearly reflect the stage of ecosystem development, factors ensuring the growth of productivity, and socio-economic effect from ecosystem mechanisms of the IT park. The study identifies the best ecosystems of IT parks and ecosystems that need to be developed and supported financially and institutionally.
Conclusions. The assessment methodology is applicable for monitoring and evaluating the stage of development of IT parks as digital regional ecosystems.

Keywords: digital ecosystem, technopark, ecosystem approach, innovation ecosystem

References:

  1. Oborin M.S. [The key development areas for technoparks in the Russian regions]. Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2020, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 103–111. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  2. Nosonov A.M. [Technoparks of Russia: Features of development, territorial differentiation and efficiency]. Geograficheskaya sreda i zhivye sistemy = Geographical Environment and Living Systems, 2020, no. 4, pp. 70–86. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Shkarupeta E.V. [Cyberphysical development of technopolises under conditions of digitalisation and intelligentisation of industry]. Ekonomika promyshlennosti = Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 2023, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 381–397. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Minaev A.V., Komarov N.M., Tomashevskaya N.G., Mel'nikova M.A. [Integration of the logistics service of the management company and the strategy of creating an industrial technopark]. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki, 2022, vol. 14, no. 2. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Kleiner G.B. [Ecosystem economy: Step into the future]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia, 2019, no. 1, pp. 40–45. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  6. Tret'yakova E.A., Freiman E.N. [Ecosystem approach in modern economic research]. Voprosy upravleniya = Management Issues, 2022, no. 1, pp. 6–20. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Solodilova N., Malikov R., Grishin K. [Artificial entrepreneurial ecosystems as a regional business environment reconfiguration factor]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economics, 2020, no. 4, pp. 38–55. (In Russ.)
  8. Tolstykh T.O., Agaeva A.M. [Ecosystem model of enterprise development in the context of digitalization]. Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tekhnike, prirode i obshchestve = Models, Systems, Networks in Economics, Technology, Nature and Society, 2020, no. 1, pp. 37–49. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Ivanov V.A. [Structural features of techno parks in Russia]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, 2023, no. 3-2, pp. 189–192. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  10. Kochieva A.K., Lysak L.V. [Intensification of industrial parks as a factor of regional economy's innovative development]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2019, vol. 25, iss. 11, pp. 2625–2642. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  11. Li Zhanhao. [Key indicators for assessing the level of technopark development as a national innovation system of China]. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatel'skii zhurnal = International Research Journal, 2022, no. 6, part 5, pp. 133–136. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  12. Gongadze I.Yu., Likhachev E.N. [Genesis and development of functional planning models of technoparks]. Tvorchestvo i sovremennost', 2023, no. 2. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  13. Korchagina I.V., Sycheva-Peredero O.V. [The effectiveness of an innovation ecosystem formation as territory strategic development element]. Upravlenie, 2019, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 44–53. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  14. Smitskikh K.V. [Theoretical aspects of the interactions between actors in the entrepreneurial ecosystem]. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Journal of Creative Economy, 2022, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3901–3912. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  15. Panchenko A.N., Lanskaya D.V. [Model of the innovation ecosystem in the regional knowledge economy]. Vestnik Akademii znanii = Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 2018, no. 24(1), pp. 176–183. URL: Link model-innovatsionnoy-ekosistemy-v-regionalnoy-ekonomike-znaniy?ysclid=ly8gjb6tfk407179731 (In Russ.)
  16. Sukhova L.F., Mirgorodskaya O.A., Botsyun I.B., Zatsarinina A.V. [On the economic boundaries of business ecosystems]. Vestnik Instituta druzhby narodov Kavkaza. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Bulletin Peoples' Friendship Institute of the Caucasus. Economic Sciences, 2019, no. 1, pp. 112–118. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Alikaeva M.V., Aslanova L.O., Shinakhov A.A. [Theories of socio-economic ecosystems: Patterns and development trends]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologii = Proceedings of Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 2020, no. 3, pp. 284–288. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  18. Chernova O.A., Matveeva L.G., Gorelova G.V. [An ecosystem approach to managing innovative development in industry]. Journal of New Economy, 2021, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 44–65. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  19. Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Chelak I.P. [Assessment of the innovative ecosystems development]. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki = Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 2020, no. 4, pp. 2359–2374. URL: Link otsenka-razvitiya-innovatsionnyh-ekosistem?ysclid=ly8g2kpz96811542867 (In Russ.)
  20. Leendertse J., Schrijvers M., Stam E. Measure Twice, Cut Once: Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Metrics. Research Policy, 2022, vol. 51, iss. 9, no. 104336. URL: Link
  21. Kapturkiewicz A. Varieties of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A comparative study of Tokyo and Bangalore. Research Policy, 2022, vol. 51, iss. 9, no. 104377. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 9
September 2024

Archive