Subject. The relevance of the article is explained by the need for an objective diagnosis of the company's sustainable development. Currently, there is no single mechanism for assessing the socio-ecological and economic state of a business, which leads to many different interpretations of the company's effectiveness, introduces uncertainty into the process of analyzing investment attractiveness. Objectives. The study aims at building analytical tools that meet the needs of all parties interested in company's activities. Methods. The study employs review-analytical and comparative techniques of information processing, methods of coupling and decoupling. Results. The paper substantiates the necessity of applying an approach based on decoupling and coupling. It reveals the importance of discrimination coefficients and transparency. I built an integrated system for analyzing the socio-environmental and economic data of the company, developed a methodology to assess the sustainable development of the company. Conclusions. It is essential to have a strict fixation of non-financial metrics of the company for transparent and objective consideration of private and public interests arising during the functioning of the business unit.
Cioli V., Giannozzi A., Pescatori L., Roggi O. Are environmental, social and government factors incorporated in the credit ratings? Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 2023, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 22–32. URL: Link_ social_and_government_factors_incorporated_in_the_credit_ratings
Verenikin A.O., Makhan'kova N.A., Verenikina A.Yu. [Measuring sustainability of Russian largest companies]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2021, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 237–287. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Míguez J.L., Rivo-Lopez E., Porteiro J., Perez-Orozco R. Selection of non-financial sustainability indicators as key elements for multi-criteria analysis of hotel chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2023, vol. 35, pp. 495–508. URL: Link
Khan M., Lockhart J., Bathurst R. A multi-level institutional perspective of corporate social responsibility reporting: A mixed-method study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 265, no. 121739. URL: Link
Ferova I.S., Kozlova S.A., Osadchenko E.A. [Special Features of Assessing the Accomplishment of Companies' Sustainability Goals during the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Peterburgskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Petersburg Economic Journal, 2021, no. 3, pp. 55–65. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Capelli P., Ielasi F., Russo A. Integrating ESG risks into value-at-risk. Finance Research Letters, 2023, vol. 55, part A, no. 103875. URL: Link
Ningwei Ma. Integration of ESG Factors in Portfolio Management: International Trends and Practices. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 2023, vol. 12, iss 2, pp. 149–152. URL: Link
Sandberg H., Alnoor A., Tiberius V. Environmental, social, and governance ratings and financial performance: Evidence from the European food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, vol. 32, iss. 4, pp. 2471–2490. URL: Link
Kaplan R.S., Ramanna K. How to Fix ESG Reporting. Harvard Business School Working Paper,2021, no. 22-005. URL: Link
Vadén T., Lähde V., Majava A. et al. Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature. Environmental Science and Policy, 2020, vol. 112, pp. 236–244. URL: Link
Yuying Zhang, Meiying Sun, Rongjin Yang et al. Decoupling of economic growth and resources-environmental pressure in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Ecological Indicators, 2021, vol. 122, no. 107314. URL: Link
Fomina V.F. [Resource efficiency and environmental impact assessment in the region by decoupling method]. Izvestiya Komi nauchnogo tsentra UrO RAN. Seriya: Ekonomicheskie nauki = Proceedings of Komi Science Center of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences. Series: Economic Sciences, 2021, no. 2, pp. 84–101. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Nikonorov S.M., Khovavko I.Yu., Caiquan Zhou [Assessment of the environmental and economic efficiency of the use of energy resources by the decoupling method (on the example of the regions of China)]. Ekonomika ustoichivogo razvitiya = Economics of Sustainable Development, 2023, no. 3, pp. 99–104. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Fomina V.F. [Assessment of water use in the regions of Russia by water supply, efficiency, and sustainable development criteria]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy, 2023, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 215–240. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Cope M.R., Kernan A.R., Sanders S.R., Ward C. Social Sustainability?: Exploring the Relationship between Community Experience and Perceptions of the Environment. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, iss. 3. URL: Link
Bobrova V.V., Korabeinikov I.N., Kirkhmeer L.V. [Decoupling in the ecological, social and economic development of the extractive industry area]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2020, vol. 18, iss. 11, pp. 2111–2130. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A. [Socio-Ecological Inequality in the Russian Federation and Problems of its Measurement]. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1047–1062. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Lippens L., Vermeiren S., Baert S. The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments. European Economic Review, 2023, vol. 153, no. 104315. Charge Rates: Variation and Sources. Socius, 2021, vol. 7. URL: Link
Tomaskovic-Devey D., McCann C. Employment Discrimination Charge Rates: Variation and Sources. Socius, 2021, vol. 7. URL: Link
Shiu-Yik Au, Barnes S., Tremblay A. Severity of Employee Discrimination and Firm Profitability – Evidence from EEOC Payout Gaps. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023. URL: Link
Khan M., Lockhart J. Corporate social responsibility decoupling in developing countries: Current research and a future agenda. Business and Society Review, 2022, vol. 127, iss. 1, pp. 127–143. URL: Link
Velte P. Determinants and consequences of corporate social responsibility decoupling – Status quo and limitations of recent empirical quantitative research. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2023, vol. 30, iss. 6, pp. 2695–2717. URL: Link
