Home  Journals  Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice  2(533) - 2023 February

Project stakeholder risk classification on the public-private partnership principles

Received: 2 December 2019

Received in revised form: 25 December 2019

Accepted: 10 January 2020

Available online: 28 February 2023

Subject Heading: INVESTMENT ANALYSIS

JEL Classification: C13, H54, L90, L98, O22

Pages: 348–364

https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.26.5.1170

Subject. This article analyzes the relations of participants of projects implemented on the principles of public-private partnership (PPP).
Objectives. The article aims to classify the risks of PPP members for their systematization and develop recommendations for their comprehensive accounting in order to improve the efficiency of collaborative engagement of the State and business.
Methods. For the study, we used the systems and targeted approaches, generalization, and the methods of comparative, factor, and criterion analyses.
Results. The article substantiates the need to classify risk and describes the key risks of PPP projects. It offers an original classification and risk matrix for PPP project participants, and complements the list of risks and their classification criteria.
Conclusions. The article puts forward the idea that the advantage of implementing PPP projects for the State is the possibility of transferring risk to a private partner. Practical use of the proposed classification and risk matrix will enable partnership members to develop and implement the most appropriate risk management systems, as well as justify the optimal strategy and policy to attract investment in the country's infrastructure complex.

Keywords: classification, matrix, risk, project, public-private partnership, participant

References:

1. Savrukov A.N., Savrukov N.T., Kozlovskaya E.A. [Assessment of the State and level of development of public-private partnership projects in the subjects of the Russian Federation]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2018, no. 7, pp. 131–141. URL: Link (In Russ.)
2. Burke R., Demirag I. Risk Transfer and Stakeholder Relationships in Public-Private Partnerships. Accounting Forum, 2017, vol. 41, iss. 1, pp. 28–43. URL: Link
3. Singh L.B., Kalidindi S.N. Traffic Revenue Risk Management Through Annuity Model of PPP Road Projects in India. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, vol. 24, iss. 7, pp. 605–613. URL: Link
4. Choi J.-ho, Chung J., Lee D.-J. Risk Perception Analysis: Participation in China's Water PPP Market. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, vol. 28, iss. 6, pp. 580–592. URL: Link
5. Wu Y., Li L., Xu R. et al. Risk Assessment in Straw-Based Power Generation Public-Private Partnership Projects in China: A Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, vol. 161, pp. 977–990. URL: Link
6. Hwang B.-G., Zhao X., Gay M.J.S. Public Private Partnership Projects in Singapore: Factors, Critical Risks and Preferred Risk Allocation from the Perspective of Contractors. International Journal of Project Management, 2013, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 424–433. URL: Link
7. Jin X.-H., Zhang G. Modelling Optimal Risk Allocation in PPP Projects Using Neural Networks. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, vol. 29, iss. 5, pp. 591–603. URL: Link
8. Marques R.C., Berg S.V. Risks, Contracts and Private-Sector Participation in Infrastructure. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011, vol. 137, iss. 11, pp. 925–932. URL: LinkCO.1943-7862.0000347
9. Sokolov M.Yu., Maslova S.V. [Risk management in public-private partnership projects]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Menedzhment = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Management, 2013, no. 4, pp. 100–124. URL: Link (In Russ.)
10. Solovei A.D. [International experience in implementing transport infrastructure projects under the PPP scheme]. Nedvizhimost' i investitsii. Pravovoe regulirovanie, 2006, no. 1-2, pp. 26–27. URL: Link (In Russ.)
11. Veksler E.Yu. [Typical risks in the implementation of public-private partnership projects]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2010, vol. 3, iss. 6, pp. 68–72. URL: Link (In Russ.)
12. Ke Y., Wang S., Chan A.P.C., Cheung E. Understanding the Risks in China's PPP Projects: Ranking of Their Probability and Consequence. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2011, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 481–496. URL: Link
13. Neshkova M.I., Kostadinova T. The Effectiveness of Administrative Reform in New Democracies. Public Administration Review, 2012, vol. 72, iss. 3, pp. 324–333. URL: Link
14. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2011, vol. 3, iss. 2, pp. 220–246. URL: Link
15. Pusok K. Public-Private Partnerships and Corruption in the Water and Sanitation Sectors in Developing Countries. Political Research Quarterly, 2016, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 678–691. URL: Link
16. Abednego M.P., Ogunlana S.O. Good Project Governance for Proper Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnerships in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, vol. 24, iss. 7, pp. 622–634. URL: Link
17. Kumar L., Jindal A., Velaga N.R. Financial Risk Assessment and Modelling of PPP Based Indian Highway Infrastructure Projects. Transport Policy, 2018, vol. 62, pp. 2–11. URL: Link
18. Shrestha A., Chan T.K., Aibinu A.A., Chen C. Efficient Risk Transfer in PPP Wastewater Treatment Projects. Utilities Policy, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 132–140. URL: Link
19. Shor I.M. [Stages of concession mechanisms implementation in the Volgograd Oblast]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2018, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 102–120. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 3 March 2024

Archive