Subject. The article considers and compares methods used in the European and domestic practice for determining the poverty line. Objectives. Our aim is to underpin the need to abandon the absolute approach to determining the poverty line in Russia in favor of relative approaches. Methods. We employ general scientific methods of cognition (comparison, analysis, and synthesis) and special methods of economic science (rationed assessments). The data of the Federal State Statistics Service and its territorial bodies, the Statistical Office of the European Communities, etc. serve as the information base of the study. Results. The paper shows the failure of the absolute approach to poverty measurement, reveals its shortcomings, determines that it distorts the picture of economic reality in the study of poverty. We apply the European monetary approach to poverty measurement. The comparative analysis of poverty rates in Western Europe and in Russia confirms the existence of extreme forms of poverty, both in developed European States and in our country. The paper uses the ‘zone theory’ to assess the severity of poverty in Russia; the actual values of these indicators in Western Europe serve as thresholds. Conclusions. The use of the relative monetary approach to measure poverty in the country gives a more accurate idea. Since 2021, Russia has switched to a similar method of calculating the subsistence rate and the minimum wage. Hence, the officially recorded level of poverty in the country will increase, and this will require additional measures to support the poor by the State.
Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007, 960 p.
Ricardo D. Sochineniya. T. 1. Nachala politicheskoi ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [The Works and Correspondence. Vol. 1. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1955, 360 p.
Malthus T.R. Opyt o zakone narodonaseleniya [An Essay on the Principle of Population]. Moscow, Direktmedia Pablishing Publ., 2008, 452 p.
Marx K. Kapital [Das Kapital - Kritik der politischen Ökonomie]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1955, 2230 p.
Engels F. Razvitie sotsializma ot utopii k nauke [Die Entwicklung des Sozialismus von der Utopie zur Wissenschaft]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1960, 80 p.
Sachs J.D. Konets bednosti: ekonomicheskie vozmozhnosti nashego vremeni [The End of Poverty. Economic Possibilities for Our Time]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publ., 2011, 424 p.
Sen A. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1981, 265 p.
Shevyakov A.Yu., Kiruta A.Ya. Neravenstvo, ekonomicheskii rost i demografiya: neissledovannye vzaimosvyazi [Inequality, economic growth and demographics: Unexplored relationships]. Moscow, M-Studio Publ., 2009, 192 p.
Aivazian S.A., Kolenikov S.O. Poverty and Expenditure Differentiation of Russian Population. Economics Education and Research Consortium Russia, interim report, November, 1999. URL: Link
Duflo E. Human Values and the Design of the Fight against Poverty. URL: Link.
Carter M. et al. Looking Forward: Theory-based Measures of Chronic Poverty and Vulnerability. In: Poverty Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 128–153.
Vedikhina A.S., Karasik E.A. [The methodology for determining the poverty line: World experience and Russian practice]. Kazanskii ekonomicheskii vestnik = Kazan Economic Vestnik, 2015, no. 5, pp. 57–63. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Roik V.D. Ekonomika razvitiya: neravenstvo, bednost' i razvitie [Development economy: Inequality, poverty and development]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2020, 474 p.
Glaz'ev S.Yu., Shchepkov A.V. Ekonomika i obshchestvo [Economy and society]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2021, 192 p.
Maleva T.M., Grishina E.E., Burdyak A.Ya. [Chronic poverty: What affects its level and severity?]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 12, pp. 24–40. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Kononenko A.P., Marunevich O.V. [Comparison of the cost of university education and the cost of living in some countries of the world]. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 2016, no. 8, pp. 68–74. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Kormishkina L.A., Kormishkin E.D., Koroleva L.P., Ermakova E.R. [European Experience of Assessing Social Justice]. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene, 2020, no. 1. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Moiseeva I.V. [Methodological approaches to assessing economic inequality]. Kontentus, 2019, no. 12. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Ermakova E.R., Moiseeva I.V. [Social indices as the realization of the idea of equal opportunity (in a sustainable market economy)]. Kontentus, 2020, no. 4, pp. 38–50. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Ilyakova I.E., Lizina O.M., Sausheva O.S. [Juvenile Potential as a Social Resource for Economic Development in a Changing Technological Order]. Regionologiya = Russian Journal of Regional Studies, 2020, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 638–665. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Korchagina I.I., Prokof'eva L.M., Ter-Akopov S.A. [Material deprivations in poverty estimations]. Narodonaselenie = Population, 2019, no. 2, pp. 51–63. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Cherkashina T.Yu. [Measurement of population income: Variants of estimating biases]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 1, pp. 127–144. (In Russ.) URL: Link