+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice

Analyzing foreign approaches to company investment appeal assessment

Vol. 19, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2020

Received: 11 August 2020

Received in revised form: 22 August 2020

Accepted: 4 September 2020

Available online: 29 October 2020


JEL Classification: М20

Pages: 1822–1839


Tyutyukina E.B. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation


Sedash T.N. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation


Subject. The article addresses the concept and basic approaches to assessing the investment appeal of the company.
Objectives. The purpose is to review and systematize main approaches that are used to assess investment attractiveness, based on the analysis of foreign sources from international databases of publications, taking into account the current requirements of company's commitment to sustainable development and social responsibility.
Methods. The study employs general scientific methods of cognition, as well as the systems and comparative analysis.
Results. We consider differences in the definition of company's investment appeal in Russia and abroad, enabling to better understand the theoretical studies of foreign colleagues.
Conclusions. In foreign literature, the company's investment attractiveness is assessed, using its financial performance measures, valuations, the impact of intangible assets on investment attractiveness, taking into account its compliance with the modern technological mode and commitment to principles of sustainable development and social responsibility. The adherence to these principles increases the investment appeal of any company and gives it an undeniable competitive edge.

Keywords: foreign experience, assessment of investment attractiveness, indicator of investment attractiveness


  1. Ilyash O. et al. Evaluation of enterprise investment attractiveness under circumstances of economic development. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 2020, vol. 47, iss. 47, pp. 95–113. URL: Link
  2. Pieloch-Babiarz A. Determinants of payout policy and investment attractiveness of companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Equilibrium, 2017, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 675–691. URL: Link
  3. Rolik Yu.A. A Complex Approach to Evaluating the Innovation Strategy of a Company to Determine its Investment Attractiveness. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 99, pp. 562–571. URL: Link
  4. Bodie A.M.Z., Kane A., Drew M., Basu A. Printsipy investitsii [Principles of Investments]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev, Vil'yams Publ., 2018, 984 p.
  5. Damodaran A. Investitsionnaya otsenka. Instrumenty i metody otsenki lyubykh aktivov [Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset]. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2020, 1316 p.
  6. Knight R., Bertoneche M. Financial Performance. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000, 304 p.
  7. Koller T., Goedhart M., Wessels D. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. John Wiley & Sons, 2010, 840 p.
  8. Ross S., Westerfield R., Jaffe J. Corporate Finance. New York, McGraw-Hill Education, 2012, 1072 p.
  9. Valuation and Modeling for Investment Bankers. London, Corporate Training Group, 2008, 440 p.
  10. Locatelli G., Mancini M., Lotti G. A simple-to-implement real options method for the energy sector. Energy, 2020, vol. 197, no. 117226. URL: Link
  11. Wörsdörfer D., Lier S., Crasselt N. Real options-based evaluation model for transformable plant designs in the process industry. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2017, vol. 42, pp. 29–43. URL: Link
  12. Metzger D., Schinas O. Fuzzy real options and shared savings: Investment appraisal for green shipping technologies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, vol. 77, pp. 1–10. URL: Link
  13. Denicolai S., Zucchella A., Strange R. Knowledge assets and firm international performance. International Business Review, 2014, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 55–62. URL: Link
  14. Penman S.H. Accounting for intangible assets: There is also an income statement. Abacus, 2009, vol. 45, iss. 3, pp. 358–371. URL: Link
  15. Marrocu E., Paci R., Pontis M. Intangible capital and firms' productivity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2011, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 377–402. URL: Link
  16. Braune E., Sahut J.-M., Teulon F. Intangible capital, governance and financial performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, vol. 154, no. 119934. URL: Link
  17. Ming-Chin Chen, Shu-Ju Cheng, Yuhchang Hwang. An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005, vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 159–176. URL: Link
  18. Gamayuni R.R. The effect of intangible asset, financial performance and financial policies on the firm value. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2015, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 202–212. URL: Link
  19. Eberhart A.C., Maxwell W.F., Siddique A.R. An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. The Journal of Finance, 2004, vol. 59, iss. 2, pp. 623–650. URL: Link
  20. Lome O., Heggeseth A.G., Moen Ø. The effect of R&D on performance: Do R&D-intensive firms handle a financial crisis better? The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2016, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 65–77. URL: Link
  21. Nagaraja N., Vinay N. The Effect of Intangible Assets on the Firm Value. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 2016, vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 307–315. URL: Link(307-315).pdf
  22. Arrighetti A., Landini F., Lasagni A. Intangible assets and firm heterogeneity: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 2014, vol. 43, iss. 1, pp. 202–213. URL: Link
  23. Megna P., Klock M. The Impact on Intangible Capital on Tobin's q in the Semiconductor Industry. The American Economic Review, 1993, vol. 83, iss. 2, pp. 265–269. URL: Link
  24. Sehrawat M., Giri A.K. A Sectoral Analysis of the Role of Stock Market Development on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Indian Economy. Global Business Review, 2017, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 911–923. URL: Link
  25. Kalleberg A.L., Marsden P.V., Reynolds J., Knoke D.H. Beyond Profit? Sectoral Differences in High-Performance Work Practices. Work and Occupations, 2006, vol. 33, iss. 3, pp. 271–302. URL: Link
  26. Bottazzi G., Secchi A. Common properties and sectoral specificities in the dynamics of U.S. manufacturing companies. Review of Industrial Organization, 2003, vol. 23, pp. 217–232. URL: Link
  27. VanderPal G. How Intangible Assets Affect the Corporate Financial Performances and How It Varies from Sector-to-Sector? Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 8, no. 8. URL: Link
  28. Youngjin Yoo, Boland R.J. Jr., Lyytinen K., Majchrzak A. Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science, 2012, vol. 23, iss. 5, pp. 1213-1522. URL: Link
  29. Kohtamäki M., Parida V. et al. Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research, 2019, vol. 104, pp. 380–392. URL: Link
  30. Reid A., Maroulis N. From Strategy to Implementation: The Real Challenge for Smart Specialization Policy. In: Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization. 2017, pp. 293–318. URL: Link
  31. Xiaoling Ouyang, Qiong Li, Kerui Du. How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy, 2020, vol. 139, no. 111310. URL: Link
  32. Anwar Khan, Faqir Muhammad et al. The impression of technological innovations and natural resources in energy-growth-environment nexus: A new look into BRICS economies. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, vol. 727, no. 138265. URL: Link
  33. Arndt Ch., Arent D., Hartley F. et al. Faster Than You Think: Renewable Energy and Developing Countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2019, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 149–168. URL: Link
  34. Fan L.W., Pan S.J., Liu G.Q. et al. Does energy efficiency affect financial performance? Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, vol. 151, pp. 53–59. URL: Link
  35. Lubin D.A., Etsy D.C. The Sustainability Imperative. Harvard Business Review, 2010, vol. 88, iss. 5, pp. 42–50. URL: Link
  36. Peloza J. The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts From Investments in Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management, 2009, vol. 35, iss. 6, pp. 1518–1541. URL: Link
  37. Dangelico R.M., Pujari D. Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, vol. 95, pp. 471–486. URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 12
December 2021