Subject. The article reviews the manufacturing industry in Russian regions, calculates the indicators of regional industrial specialization needed for development of econometric models of spatial panel data. Objectives. The purpose is to create a methodology for analyzing the regional industrial specialization based on econometric tools; to test it, using the case of the manufacturing industry, for determining the type of externalities in the Russian Federation. Methods. To build econometric models, we use methods of least squares and maximum likelihood. We apply localization ratios to assess regional industrial specialization in terms of the volume of employment, revenue and investment in manufacturing, workforce productivity, etc. Results. The findings show the clustering of regions by the level of productivity. The localization of manufacturing industry in regions in terms of localization of employment and localization of productivity is negatively related to productivity in the region. This can be explained by the transition of regional economies to the post-industrial mode, where the service sector becomes more important, and by possible over-industrialization and specialization of certain regions in the context of the need to develop related sectors and to build links between them. The presence of direct negative MAR externalities may indicate a need for further research in positive Porter and Jacobs externalities for Russian regions manufacturing industry. Conclusions. The developed methodology enables to identify and analyze relationships between regional industrial specialization and regional indicators; to specify the type of externalities and determine the existence of indirect and direct effects of industry localization.
Keywords: regional industrial specialization, spatial panel data analysis, localization, manufacturing industry
Beaudry C., Schiffauerova A. Who's Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate. Research Policy, 2009, vol. 38, iss. 2, pp. 318–337. URL: Link
Zemtsov S., Barinova V. [The paradigm changing of regional innovation policy in Russia: Аrom equalization to smart specialization]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2016, no. 10, pp. 65–81. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Shleifer A. et al. Growth in Cities. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, vol. 100, iss. 6, pp. 1126–1152. URL: Link
Marshall A. Principles of Economics. London, Macmillan and Co., 8th ed., 1920.
Arrow K. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Rowley C.K. (ed.) Readings in Industrial Economics. London, Palgrave, pp. 219–236. URL: Link
Romer P.M. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, vol. 94, iss. 5, pp. 1002–1037. URL: Link
Fracasso A., Vittucci Marzetti G. Estimating Dynamic Localization Economies: The Inadvertent Success of the Specialization Index and the Location Quotient. Regional Studies, 2018, vol. 52, iss. 1, pp. 119–132. URL: Link
Jacobs J. The Economy of Cities. New York, Random House, 1969.
Sörensson R. Marshallian Sources of Growth and Interdependent Location of Swedish Firms and Households. Umeå University, Department of Economic, 2010. URL: Link
Porter M.E. Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies, and Regional Policy. International Regional Science Review, 1996, vol. 19, iss. 1–2, pp. 85–90. URL: Link
De Lucio J.J. et al. The effects of externalities on productivity growth in Spanish industry. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2002, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 241–258. URL: Link00081-3
Canfei He, Fenghua Pan. Economic Transition, Dynamic Externalities and City-Industry Growth in China. Urban Studies, 2010, vol. 47, iss. 1, pp. 121–144. URL: Link
Guevara C. et al. Agglomeration Externalities in Ecuador. Do Urbanisation and Tertiarisation Matter? GATE Working Paper, September 2018, no. 1818, 29 p. URL: Link
Sharma A. Dynamic Externalities and Regional Manufacturing Growth: Evidence from India. Studies in Business and Economics, 2017, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 185–201. URL: Link
Song T., Cieslik A. Determinants of City Choice of Foreign Direct Investment into China: The Role of Specialisation, Diversification and Competition Externalities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2018, vol. 109, iss. 3, pp. 449–462. URL: Link
Fazio G., Maltese E. Agglomeration Externalities and the Productivity of Italian Firms. Growth and Change, 2015, vol. 46, iss. 3, pp. 354–378. URL: Link
Widodo W., Salim R., Bloch H. Agglomeration Economies and Productivity Growth in Manufacturing Industry: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. The Economic Record, 2014, vol. 90, iss. s1, pp. 41–58. URL: Link
Bun M.J.G., El Makhloufi A. Dynamic Externalities, Local Industrial Structure and Economic Development: Panel Data Evidence for Morocco. Regional Studies, 2007, vol. 41, iss. 6, pp. 823–837. URL: Link
Friso de Vor, Henri de Groot L.F. Agglomeration Externalities and Localized Employment Growth: The Performance of Industrial Sites in Amsterdam. The Annals of Regional Science, 2010, vol. 44, iss. 3, pp. 409–431. URL: Link
Poot J., de Groot H.L.F., Smit M.J. Which Agglomeration Externalities Matter Most and Why? Journal of Economic Surveys, 2016, vol. 30, iss. 4, pp. 756–782. URL: Link
Skhvediani A.E. [Basic premises of classical linear regression and the consequences of their violations]. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation and Investment, 2020, no. 8, pp. 38–42. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Treivish A.I. [Uneven and structurally diverse spatial development of economy as a scientific problem and Russian reality]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 13–35. URL: Link (In Russ.)