Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

Enhancing the reliability of SWOT analysis results based on methods of the expert systems theory

Vol. 18, Iss. 12, DECEMBER 2019

Received: 13 August 2019

Received in revised form: 13 September 2019

Accepted: 11 November 2019

Available online: 25 December 2019


JEL Classification: C01, C38, G32, G41

Pages: 2322–2338

Bukharin S.V. Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies (VSUET), Voronezh, Russian Federation

Subject The article addresses the SWOT analysis technique, reviews its pros and cons, and its methodology refinement.
Objectives The study aims to improve the reliability of SWOT analysis, using the expert systems theory methods.
Methods I employ methods of financial analysis, strategic management, theory of expert systems, analysis of hierarchies, rank statistics, and correlation analysis.
Results Based on the expert systems theory, I developed a simplified methodology for expert group selection. It rests on identification and elimination of inconsistency of expert evaluations through correlation analysis. I present an overall indicator for all four groups of factors of SWOT analysis in the form of a rating number; the weight coefficients of the rating number are determined through the analysis of hierarchies. The study uses the case of a bakery in Voronezh, and offers various options of strategy for its financial and economic activity improvement.
Conclusions The offered methodology for enhancing the reliability of SWOT analysis results enables to compare various enterprises on the basis of an integrated indicator of quality.

Keywords: SWOT analysis, expert systems, rating number, correlation


  1. Krutsko V.G. [Usage of SWOT-analysis for evaluation and forecasting of company’s work]. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = The International Scientific Journal, 2013, no. 6, pp. 5–11. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  2. Shestov A. [Efficiency of application of SWOT-analysis at the enterprise]. RISK: Resursy, Informatsiya, Snabzhenie, Konkurentsiya = RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition, 2013, no. 1, pp. 51–55. (In Russ.)
  3. Golubkov E.P. [SWOT-analysis: The existing techniques and ways of their improvement]. Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom = Marketing in Russia and Abroad, 2013, no. 1, pp. 5–15. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Nagernyuk D.V. [SWOT-analysis as the method of defining competitive advantages]. Sovremennye fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya = Modern Fundamental and Applied Researche, 2013, no. 2, pp. 73–76. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  5. Shipilov N.Yu., Ocherednikova O.S. [SWOT analysis in strategic planning at agricultural enterprises of the Republic of Crimea]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2019, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 696–713. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  6. Battalova A.I., Movchan N.I. [Practical Application of SWOT Analysis in the formation of the development strategy of the project organization]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki, 2018, no. 3 (In Russ.) URL: Link
  7. Agapitova L.G. [SWOT analysis as a tool for diagnostics and management of economic condition of the organization]. Agroprodovol'stvennaya politika Rossii = Agro-Food Policy in Russia, 2017, no. 10, pp. 11–15. (In Russ.)
  8. Mikheeva A.V. [SWOT-analysis of the machine-building enterprise]. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Science and Education, 2016, no. 12, pp. 40–41. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Lang V.V., Timonina I.A. [SWOT-analysis as a tool to determine the attractiveness of a project through the analysis of competitive environment]. Vestnik SevKavGTI = Scientific Bulletin SevKavGTI, 2018, iss. 1, pp. 10–12. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  10. Hill T., Westbrook R. SWOT analysis: It’s time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 1997, vol. 30, iss. I, pp. 46–52. URL: Link00095-7
  11. Valentin E.K. Away With SWOT Analysis: Use Defensive/Offensive Evaluation Instead. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 2005, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 91–105. URL: Link
  12. Shtaiger A.A. [Stages of expert systems development]. Vestnik sovremennykh issledovanii, 2018, no. 6-1, pp. 559–561. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  13. Ibrasheva A.R. [Positioning of enterprises on the basis of SWOT-analysis]. Innovatsionnaya nauka = Innovation Science, 2016, no. 4, pp. 169–173. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  14. Gubanova E.V., Polyarina E.M., Demicheva M.A. [Research of tendencies of development of PJSC Sberbank by means of SWOT analysis]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2016, no. 6, pp. 272–276. (In Russ.)
  15. Ruposov V.L., Chernykh A.A. [Processing formalized SWOT-analysis expert evaluation data]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University, 2017, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 81–89. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  16. Danilov N.N., Inozemtseva L.P. [A mathematical model of dynamic SWOT-analysis and its application methodology in economics]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2016, no. 9, pp. 185–196. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Mirzoeva T.V., Vasilenko E.V. [SWOT-analysis as an instrument of process optimization at agricultural enterprises]. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = Topical Issues of Humanities and Sciences, 2018, no. 8, pp. 40–45. (In Russ.)
  18. Alekseev A.V., Udodova E.N. [Qualitative SWOT analysis and its application in problems of management of critical marine facilities]. Morskie intellektual'nye tekhnologii = Marine Intellectual Technologies, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–48. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  19. Bukachev D.S. [Method of Assessing the Consistency of Expert Data in Economic Information Systems]. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya = Science and Business: Development Ways, 2018, no. 11, pp. 47–50. URL: Link-2018-main.pdf (In Russ.)
  20. Bukharin S.V., Mel'nikov A.V. Klasterno-ierarkhicheskie metody ekspertizy ekonomicheskikh ob"ektov: monografiya [Cluster and hierarchical methods to examine economic objects: a monograph]. Voronezh, Nauchnaya kniga Publ., 2012, 276 p.
  21. Saaty T.L. Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pair Wise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors – The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. RACSAM (Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences, Series A, Mathematics), 2008, vol. 102, iss. 2, pp. 251–318. URL: Link
  22. Weihrich H. The TOWS Matrix – A Tool for Situational Analysis. Long Range Planning, 1982, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 54–66. URL: Link90120-0

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 19, Iss. 6
June 2020