+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice

Digital economy as a subject of regulation: The institutional theory perspective

Vol. 18, Iss. 11, NOVEMBER 2019

Received: 26 June 2019

Received in revised form: 18 July 2019

Accepted: 16 August 2019

Available online: 29 November 2019


JEL Classification: B52

Pages: 2044–2058


Frolov D.P. Volgograd State Technical University (VSTU), Volgograd, Russian Federation


Lavrent'eva A.V. Volgograd State University (VolSU), Volgograd, Russian Federation


Subject The article analyzes the nature and specifics of digital economy as a subject of regulation from the point of view of institutional methodology.
Objectives The objectives of the study include classification and substantive characteristics of digital economy evolution, delineation of conceptual approaches to its definition, development of categorical system of digital economy from the perspective of institutional theory, a multilevel analysis of future institutional changes in the digital economy regulation.
Methods The study rests on the methodology for institutional and evolutionary analysis.
Results We reveal the logic of digital economy evolution and its internal contradictions, perform a comparative analysis of approaches to defining the essence and forms, functions and structure of digital economy, fine-tune and supplement the conceptual framework for the theory of digital economy. The paper presents a conceptual model of multilevel transition of economy to the scenario of digital development, and conceptual recommendations for digital economy regulation.
Conclusions It is important to separate digital and digitized areas. It is also reasonable to distinguish between institutional and intracompany digital sectors. Institutional changes should be made in the multilevel format and in the experimental mode (regulatory sandbox, legal foresight, public discussion).

Keywords: digital economy, digitalization, institution, smart contract, smart institution


  1. Hesmondhalgh D. Kul'turnye industrii [The Cultural Industries]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2014, 456 p.
  2. Carr N.G. Does IT Matter? Information Technology and the Corrosion of Competitive Advantage. Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 2004, 208 p.
  3. Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York, Basic Books, 2012.
  4. Florida R. Who's Your City? How the Creative Economy Is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life. New York, Basic Books, 2009, 384 p.
  5. Carlaw K. Beyond the Hype: Intellectual Property and the Knowledge Society/Knowledge Economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2006, vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 633–690. URL: Link
  6. Scott A.J. Beyond the Creative City: Cognitive–Cultural Capitalism and the New Urbanism. Regional Studies, 2014, vol. 48, iss. 4, pp. 565–578. URL: Link
  7. Cocco G., Szaniecki B. Creative Capitalism, Multitudinous Creativity: Radicalities and Alterities. Lanham, Lexington Books, 2015, 288 p.
  8. Hullmann А. Who Is Winning the Global Nanorace? Nature Nanotechnology, 2006, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 81–83. URL: Link
  9. Roco M.C., Bainbridge W.S. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, 482 p.
  10. Roco M.C., Bainbridge W.S. The New World of Discovery, Invention, and Innovation: Convergence of Knowledge, Technology, and Society. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2013, vol. 15, pp. 1–17. URL: Link
  11. Goede M. The Wise Society: Beyond the Knowledge Economy. Foresight, 2011, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 36-45. URL: Link
  12. Walker S. Design and Spirituality: Material Culture for a Wisdom Economy. Design Issues, 2013, vol. 29, iss. 3, pp. 89–107. URL: Link
  13. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. The Race Between Machine and Man: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares and Employment. NBER Working Paper, 2016, no. 22252. URL: Link
  14. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. NBER Working Paper, 2017, no. 23285. URL: Link
  15. Frolov D. [Theory of Crises after Crisis: Technologies versus Institutions]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2011, no. 7, pp. 17–33. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Frolov D. [Methodological Institutionalism 2.0: From Institutions to Institutional Configurations]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2016, no. 7, pp.147–160. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  17. Gomber P., Koch J.-A., Siering M. Digital Finance and FinTech: Current Research and Future Research Directions. Journal of Business Economics, 2017, vol. 87, iss. 5, pp. 537–580. URL: Link
  18. Bukht R., Heeks R. [Defining, Conceptualising and Measuring the Digital Economy]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii = International Organisations Research Journal, 2017, no. 2, pp. 143–172. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 3
March 2024