+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice

Evaluating the synergy effect of consolidation process under the cognitive modeling method

Vol. 16, Iss. 7, JULY 2017

Received: 24 May 2017

Received in revised form: 8 June 2017

Accepted: 22 June 2017

Available online: 27 July 2017


JEL Classification: G11, L10, L25

Pages: 1286–1306


Izhevskii V.L. Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation

Kononov V.N. Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation

Importance Striving for synergy, modern corporations often consolidate, i.e. incorporate other business units into their structure. However, the nature and methods to assess the synergy effects lack accurate definition, and this is indicated by many studies revealing a high proportion of economically inefficient consolidation processes.
Objectives The study aims to develop a comprehensive methodology to evaluate the synergy effect as a system of interrelated indicators demonstrating the synergy between companies.
Methods The system of synergy indicators can be graphically represented and mathematically described using the cognitive modeling method, where the peaks will be individual indicators selected by decomposition and subsequent synthesis of the synergy effect, and the arcs – relationships between them. The resulting indicator in the proposed system is a change in cash flows after consolidation.
Results The result of the study is the constructed system of indicators and interrelations between them, fixed in the form of a cognitive map of the synergy effect. Based on the developed cognitive map, two relative performance indicators were proposed for managing consolidation processes and evaluating the synergistic effect, i.e. the consolidation process profitability and the synergy effect profitability. These indicators will enable to decide on expediency of consolidation, compare the effectiveness of several consolidation projects, assess the efficiency of consolidation as a deal with previous company owners.
Conclusions The offered approach decomposition and subsequent synthesis of synergistic effect and the cognitive map of synergy factors can be used to support management decisions related to consolidation processes in groups of companies.

Keywords: consolidation process, synergy effect, cognitive modeling, cognitive maps, group of companies


  1. Dieudonne S., Cretin F., Bouacha S. M&A Activity: Where Are We in the Cycle? Alternative Investment Analyst Review, 2015. URL: Link
  2. Penrose E.T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1959.
  3. Christensen C., Alton R., Rising C., Waldeck A. The Big Idea: The New M&A Playbook. URL: Link
  4. Ivanov A.E. Sinergeticheskii effekt integratsii kompanii: mekhanizmy formirovaniya, otsenka, uchet: monografiya [Synergy effect of companies integration: Formation mechanisms, assessment, accounting: a monograph]. Moscow, RIOR, INFRA-M Publ., 2014, 156 p.
  5. Khusainov Z.I. [M&A deal efficiency: integrated evaluation methodology]. Korporativnye finansy = Corporate Finance, 2008, no. 1, pp. 12–33. (In Russ.)
  6. Gaughan P.A. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructurings. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007, 648 p.
  7. Ansoff I. Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. McGraw-Hill, 1965, 286 p.
  8. Rodionov I.I., Mikhal'chuk V.B. [Synergies in M&A Deals in Russia in 2006–2014]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2016, no. 2, pp. 3–28. (In Russ.)
  9. Damodaran A. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley Finance, 2012, 992 p.
  10. Avdeeva Z.K., Kovriga S.V., Makarenko D.I. [Cognitive modeling to solve problems of managing the weakly structured systems (situations)]. Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami = Large-scale Systems Control, 2006, no. 16, pp. 26–39. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  11. Ashenfelter O., Hosken D. The Effect of Mergers on Consumer Prices: Evidence from Five Selected Case Studies. CEPS Working Paper, 2008, no. 160.
  12. Pindyck R., Rubinfeld D. Microeconomics. Pearson, 8th edition, 2012, 768 p.
  13. Lerner A.P. The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power. Review of Economic Studies, 1934, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 157–175.
  14. Izhevskii V.L. [Application of the transaction costs theory in the consolidation processes management]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Ekonomika i menedzhment = Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Economics and Management, 2017, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 106–116. (In Russ.)
  15. Khasanova G.F., Burenina I.V. [Synergy as a method for increasing company's effectiveness]. Neftegazovoe delo, 2011, no. 6, pp. 188–196. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Graaf A., Pienaar A.J. Synergies in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Critical Review and Synthesis of the Leading Valuation Practices. SA Journal of Accounting Research, 2013, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 143–180.
  17. Destri A.M.L., Picone P.M., Minà A. From “Strategic Fit” to Synergies Evaluation in M&A Deals. Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2012, vol. 1, iss. 12, pp. 25–38. URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 2
February 2021