Yagudina O.V.Branch of Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University in Naberezhnye Chelny, Naberezhnye Chelny, Russian Federation Skryleva-olga-vl@mail.ru
Importance The article considers the organization of personnel management system based on the principle of labor dynasties development in collective enterprises (joint-stock companies with employees as shareholders) currently operating in the Russian Federation. Objectives The study aims to investigate successful implementation of the personnel management policy based on developing the principle of family labor relations, to reveal the specifics of the said management system. Methods The study rests on sociological research techniques. In particular, we conducted employee surveys in labor collectives of joint-stock companies with employees as shareholders (employee-owned enterprises). Results At present, collective enterprises actively develop the principle of family labor relations (labor dynasties), which implies the support for professional continuity of employees at all stages of personnel management (recruitment, training, career progression, performance appraisal, etc.) based on strict observance of labor legislation of the Russian Federation. The rights of other workers (not included in the family dynasty) are not limited in any way. Such aspects of family labor relations as involvement, high degree of employee awareness of the state of affairs at the enterprise, support to employee initiative by management, favorable moral and psychological climate, trust-based relations between employees and management are important components of organizational culture of collective enterprises. Conclusions and Relevance Personnel management system based on professional continuity and corporate traditions of family relations helps accelerate the adaptation of newcomers, support the stability of labor collectives, involve employees in managerial processes, reduce labor conflicts, and increase the overall satisfaction of the staff.
Zibrova E.A. Psikhologiya trudovykh dinastii: monografiya. [Psychology of labor dynasties: a monograph]. Khabarovsk, Khabarovsk Regional Institute for Retraining and Professional Development in Vocational Education Publ., 2014, 95 p.
Cabrera-Suárez K., De Saá-Pérez P., García-Almeida D. The Succession Process from a Resource- and Knowledge-Based View of the Family Firm. Family Business Review, 2001, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 37–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x
Lee K.S., Lim G.H., Lim W.S. Family Business Succession: Appropriation Risk and Choice of Successor. Academy of Management Review, 2003, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 657–666. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2003.10899446
Tokhtobina O.L. [Generic relations as a closed social capital]. Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Filosofiya = Vestnik NSU. Series: Philosophy, 2012, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 95–100. (In Russ.)
Barkov S.A., Dorokhina O.V. [Political history of nepotism]. Rodina = Motherland, 2010, no. 8, pp. 28–31. (In Russ.)
Bloom N., Van Reenen J. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007, vol. 122, iss. 4, pp. 1351–1408. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351
Kets de Vries M. Family Business: Human Dilemmas in the Family Firm. England, London, Thomson Business Press, 1996.
Keskyula E. [Disembedding the enterprise from the ties of kinship: Bad clanship and atomized labor in the Estonian mine]. Laboratorium, 2014, no. 6(2), pp. 159–164. (In Russ.)
Dabos G.E., Rousseau D.M. Mutuality and Reciprocity in the Psychological Contracts of Employees and Employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, vol. 89, iss. 1, pp. 52–72. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.52
Jung J. The Role of Reciprocity in Social Support. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1990, vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 243–253.
Sedov E.V., Khabibullin R.I. [A regulatory mechanism of balanced development of collective enterprises (employee-owned enterprise) in the Russian Federation]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2017, no. 1, pp. 49–52. (In Russ.)
Bocharova I.Yu. Ekonomicheskie interesy v firme [Economic interests in the firm]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2007, 356 p.
Rudyk E.N., Keremetskii Ya.N., Bukreev V.V. [Reservation and protection of property rights of employees in joint-stock companies: Major problems and solutions]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economics Journal, 2001, no. 3, pp. 24–32. (In Russ.)
Korchagina E.V., Shilo P.G. [Organizational culture of family firms: Key features]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom = Management in Russia and Abroad, 2016, no. 1, pp. 115–122. (In Russ.)
Plotnikova E.B., Germanov I.A., Kuznetsov A.E. Rabotniki kak sub"ekty trudovykh otnoshenii: izmenenie strategii uchastiya v upravlenii proizvodstvom na sovremennykh rossiiskikh predpriyatiyakh [Employees as subjects of labor relations: Changing strategies for participation in production management at modern Russian enterprises]. Perm, Perm State University Publ., 2007, 269 p.
Lopez-Cabrales A., Perez-Luno A., Cabrera R.V. Knowledge as a Mediator Between HRM Practices and Innovative Activity. Human Resource Management, 2009, vol. 48, iss. 4, pp. 485–503. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20295
Walsworth S., Verma A. Globalization, Human Resource Practices and Innovation: Recent evidence from the Canadian workplace and employee survey. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 2007. vol. 46, iss. 2, pp. 222–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.2007.00466.x
Nekrasova O.V., Khabibullin R.I. [Collective enterprise and traditional company: A comparative analysis of corporate cultures]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 188–196. (In Russ.)
Deal T.E., Kennedy A.A. Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. New York, Perseus Books Publ., 2000.
Handy C.B. Gods of Management: The Changing Work of Organizations. Oxford University Press, 1996, 272 p.
Cameron K., Quinn R. Diagnostika i izmenenie organizatsionnoi kul'tury [Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001, 320 p.
