+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Government expenditure and economic growth: Evaluation of the threshold share

Vol. 15, Iss. 4, APRIL 2016

Received: 3 December 2015

Received in revised form: 15 January 2016

Accepted: 20 January 2016

Available online: 27 April 2016

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: C23, O23, O47

Pages: 57-71

Perevyshin Yu.N. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russian Federation
perevyshin-yn@ranepa.ru

Importance The share of public expenditure in the Russian gross domestic product (GDP) has increased during recent years. The economic slowdown has become a serious problem. All of these underline the importance of the impact of fiscal policy on GDP long-term trends.
Objectives The study aims to evaluate the threshold share of public expenditure in GDP, above which the public spending will negatively affect the growth rate of output.
Methods I use general equilibrium models to analyze the channels of government spending's impact on the economic growth, and econometric techniques of panel data analysis to estimate the threshold of the public spending share.
Results Based on literature review, I conclude that the impact of government spending on economic growth is described by an inverted U-shaped curve. The critical review of results and methods used in empirical studies helps determine an appropriate approach to estimating the optimal public expenditure share. According to the estimates, the threshold share of public expenditure is within 10 to 26% of GDP. The share of consolidated budget expenditures in the Russian economy exceeds this threshold.
Conclusions For most of commodity-exporting countries, the impact of government spending on economic growth is negative. It means that these countries are on the downward sector of the inverted U-shaped curve. Further increase in the share of public spending in GDP of Russia may lead to lower economic growth. The econometric analysis results indicate that the Government should reduce the share of public spending in GDP to stimulate the economic growth in Russia.

Keywords: government size, economic growth, threshold share, government expenditure

References:

  1. Barro R. Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. S103–S125.
  2. Glomm G., Ravikumar B. Productive Government Expenditures and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1997, no. 21, pp. 183–204.
  3. Lee J. Optimal Size and Composition of Government Spending. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1992, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 423–439.
  4. Chen B. Economic Growth with an Optimal Public Spending Composition. Oxford Economic Papers, 2006, no. 58, pp. 123–136.
  5. Ghosh S., Gregoriou A. The Composition of Government Spending and Growth: Is Current or Capital Spending Better? Oxford Economic Papers, 2008, no. 60, pp. 484–516. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpn005
  6. Bajo-Rubio O. A Further Generalization of the Solow Growth Model: The Role of the Public Sector. Economics Letters, 2000, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 79–84.
  7. Carboni O., Medda G. Size and Composition of Public Spending in a Neoclassical Growth Model. Metroeconomica, 2011, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 150–170.
  8. Perevyshin Yu.N. Modelirovanie vliyaniya razmera gosudarstvennogo sektora na tempy rosta v dinamicheskoi modeli obshchego ravnovesiya s neodnorodnymi ekonomicheskimi agentami [Government size and economic growth in the DGE model with heterogeneous households]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Auditing and Financial Analysis, 2012, no. 1, pp. 174–179.
  9. Landau D. Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: a Cross-Country Study. Southern Economic Journal, 1983, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 783–792.
  10. Grier K., Tullock G. An Empirical Analysis of Cross-National Economic Growth: 1951–1980. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1989, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 259–276.
  11. Ram R. Government Size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Evidence from Cross-Section and Time-Series Data. American Economic Review, 1986, vol. 76, pp. 191–203.
  12. Barro R. Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 407–443.
  13. Illarionov A.N., Pivovarova N.A. Razmery gosudarstva i ekonomicheskii rost [Government size and economic growth]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2002, no. 9, pp. 18–45.
  14. Idrisov G.I., Sinel'nikov-Murylev S.G. Byudzhetnaya politika i ekonomicheskii rost [Budget policy and economic growth]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2013, no. 8, pp. 35–59.
  15. Barro R. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. MIT Press, 1997, 160 p.
  16. Fölster S., Henrekson M. Growth and the Public Sector: A Critique of the Critics. European Journal of Political Economy, 1999, vol. 15, pp. 337–358.
  17. Angelopoulos K., Economides G., Kammas P. Tax-Spending Policies and Economic Growth: Theoretical Predictions and Evidence from the OECD. European Journal of Political Economy, 2007, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 885–902.
  18. Moreno-Dodson B. Assessing the Impact of Public Spending on Growth: An Empirical Analysis for Seven Fast Growing Countries. Policy Research Working Paper, 2008, no. 4663, pp. 1–57.
  19. Perevyshin Yu.N. Empiricheskii analiz vliyaniya gosudarstvennykh raskhodov na tempy rosta v stranakh mira. V kn.: Sbornik trudov nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Ekonometricheskie metody v issledovanii global'nykh ekonomicheskikh protsessov [An empirical analysis of the impact of public expenditure on the growth in countries around the world. In: Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference 'Econometric Methods in the Global Economic Processes']. Moscow, Ankil Publ., 2013, 260 p.
  20. Scully G. The 'Growth Tax' in the United States. Public Choice, 1995, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 71–80.
  21. Davies A. Human Development and the Optimal Size of Government. Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 326–330.
  22. Nichitean A., Lupu D., Asandului M. Budgetary Policies in Eastern European Countries. Procedia – Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 20, pp. 428–432.
  23. Teräsvirta T., Anderson H. Characterizing Nonlinearities in Business Cycles Using Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1992, vol. 7, pp. S119–S136.
  24. Chiou-Wei S.-Z., Zhu Z., Kuo Y.H. Government Size and Economic Growth: An Application of the Smooth Transition Regression Model. Applied Economics Letters, 2010, vol. 17, pp. 1405–1415.
  25. Karras G. On the Optimal Government Size in Europe: Theory and Empirical Evidence. The Manchester School, 1997, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 280–294.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 9
September 2024

Archive