Subject Insufficient elaboration of problems related to introduction of ISO 9000 and Total Quality Management principles determines the importance of the study and the scope of issues it addresses. Objectives The main objective is to devise theoretical and methodological tools to perfect the quality management system of enterprises based on building and developing the models of product lifecycle quality. Methods We use economic and mathematical tools to provide a methodological underpinning for processes of guaranteed product quality management at enterprises. Results We developed a set of complementary models of product quality dynamic development based on the S-shaped logical model of product quality; of complex product quality with the allocation of a model of real product quality and a model of image-making product quality enabling to distinguish a geometric image of the roadmap of product lifecycle within the interaction of the enterprise and the market. The models serve as settings for extreme economic regulators of the integrated flexible quality management system for sustainable product quality control. Conclusions The developed models are informative and robust. They adequately describe real processes of production quality and raw materials quality. The findings aim to solve the urgent problem related to increasing the productivity and efficiency of TQM strategy development at enterprises.
Keywords: quality management, enterprise, sustainability, system
References:
Saga o sertifikatakh (kommentarii k otchetu The ISO Survey of Certifications – 2009) [The certificates saga (comments on The ISO Survey of Certifications – 2009 report)]. Standarty i kachestvo = Standards and Quality, 2011, no. 3, pp. 94–100.
Volkova S.A. Gosudarstvennaya politika razvitiya biotekhnologii kak faktor rosta kachestva zhizni naseleniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Government policy of biotechnology development as a growth factor of life quality of the population of the Russian Federation]. Ekonomika. Innovatsii. Upravlenie kachestvom = Economy. Innovation. Quality Management, 2014, no. 4, pp. 47–48.
Womack J.P., Jones D.T. Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo.Kak izbavit'sya ot poter' i dobit'sya protsvetaniya vashei kompanii [Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation]. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2004, 473 p.
Matveikin V.G., Dmitrievskii B.S., Panchenko I.S. Postroenie grafa sostoyanii funktsionirovaniya innovatsionno-proizvodstvennoi sistemy [Plotting a graph of the status of the innovation and production system functioning]. Sistemy upravleniya i informatsionnye tekhnologii = Control Systems and Information Technologies, 2011, no. 1, pp. 37–40.
Hayes B.E., Goodden R., Atkinson R., Murdock F., Smith D. Where to Start: Experts Weigh In on What All of Us Can Learn from Toyota’s Challenges. Quality Progress, 2010, pp. 16–23.
Davenport T.H., Jarvenpaa S.L., Beers M.S. Improving Knowledge Work Processes. MIT Sloan Management Review, 1996, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 53–65.
Miscikowski D.K., Stein E.W. Empowering Employees to Pull the Quality Trigger. Quality Progress, 2006, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 43–48.
Feigenbaum A.V. Total Quality Control. New York, McGraw-Hill Companies, 1991, 896 p.
Jarvinen P., Lillrank P., Malti T. Cost of Poor Quality Analysis in a Non-Routine Process. Proceedings of 44th Annual EOQ Congress, Budapest, 2000, vol. 3, pp. 85–94.
Juran J.M. Management of Quality. New York, 1982, 256 p.
Edmund M. The Architect of Quality Joseph M. Juran (1904–2008). Quality Progress, April 2008, pp. 20–25.
Okrepilov V.V. Evolyutsiya kachestva [Quality evolution]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2008, 744 p.
Zlobina N.V. Strategicheskie instrumenty razvitiya sistemy kachestva organizatsii [Strategic instruments to develop the quality system of the organization]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta = Scientific and Technical Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, 2010, no. 6, pp. 105–110.
