+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

The extent to which the investors' synergetic optimism is justified: findings on impairment of goodwill recognized in major M&A deals over 2008-2012 involving Russian companies

Vol. 14, Iss. 41, NOVEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 21 July 2015

Accepted: 30 September 2015

Available online: 9 November 2015

Subject Heading: INVESTMENT ANALYSIS

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 35-59

Ivanov A.E. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
ivanov.chel@list.ru

Subject The article continues a series of publications dedicated to the research of major integrated transactions involving Russian companies. I identified and analyzed 50 major M&A transactions over 2008-2012, which resulted in goodwill recognition in the buyer's financial statements. This article studies the subsequent annual test results of the recognized goodwill for impairment.
     Objectives The purpose is to identify the extent to which the acquisitions by (and of) Russian companies at the price exceeding their fair value can be justified.
     Methods At the earlier stages, I identified major integrated transactions over 2008-2012, where Russian companies acted as sellers or buyers, analyzed the financial statements that reported the recognized goodwill. The detailed analysis showed the exact volumes of transactions, the amount of recognized goodwill, and its causes. This article considers the results of the fourth stage, during which I reviewed the financial statements of the companies analyzed at the previous stages in terms of existence of impairment of the acquired goodwill.
     Results I identified the highest risk of recognizing the impairment of goodwill in financial statements; prepared Top 10 rating of the biggest volumes of goodwill impairment over 2009-2014 that was recognized in major integrated transactions involving Russian companies for 2008-2012. The study presents the comparison of the rationale behind the causes of overpaying for goodwill in the integrated transactions and charging-off the impaired goodwill.
     Conclusions The article may be useful for all those interested in integration processes in Russia from the perspective of unique statistical material presentation.

Keywords: mergers, acquisitions, synergetic effect, goodwill, impairment

References:

  1. Agrawal A., Jaffe J. The Post-Merger Performance Puzzle. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 2000, no. 1, pp. 119–156.
  2. Ahuja G., Katila R. Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 197–220.
  3. Bradley M., Desai A., Kim E.H. Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, no. 21(1), pp. 3–40.
  4. Cartwright S., Cooper C.L. Managing Mergers, Acquisitions and Strategic Alliances: Integrating People and Cultures. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996.
  5. Cartwright S., Schoenberg R. 30 Years of Mergers and Acquisitions Research: Recent Advances and Future Opportunities. British Journal of Management, 2006, vol. 17, iss. S1, pp. S1–S5.
  6. Conn C., Cosh A., Guest P., Hughes A. Long-run Share Performance of UK Firms Engaging in Cross-Border Acquisitions. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper, 2001, no. 214.
  7. Evans F.Ch., Bishop D.M. Valuation of Companies in Mergers and Acquisitions: Creating Value in Private Companies. Harvard Business Review, 2004, 332 p.
  8. Jenny F., Weber A.P. France, 1962–1972. In: The Determinants and Effects of Mergers: An International Comparison. Mueller D.C. (ed.). Cambridge, Mass., Oelgeschlager, Gunn&Hain, 1980, pp. 133–162.
  9. Hitt M.A., King D., Krishnan H., Makri M., Schijven M., Shimizu K., Zhu H. Mergers and Acquisitions: Overcoming Pitfalls, Building Synergy, And Creating Value. Business Horizons, 2009, vol. 52, no. 6. Available at: Link.
  10. Gregory A. An Examination of the Long Run Performance of UK Acquiring Firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1997, vol. 24, iss. 7-8, pp. 971–1002.
  11. Cristofferson S., McNish R., Sias D. Where Mergers Go Wrong. McKinsey Quarterly, 2004, no. 2. Available at: Link.
  12. Laamanen T. On the Role of Acquisition Premium in Acquisition Research. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, vol. 28, iss. 13, pp. 1359–1369.
  13. Marks L.M., Mirvis P.H. Managing Mergers, Acquisitions and Alliances: Creating an Effective Transition Structure. Organizational Dynamics, 2000, no. 28(3), pp. 35–47.
  14. Rau P.R., Vermaelen T. Glamour, Value and the Post-Acquisition Performance of Acquiring Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, no. 49, pp. 223–253.
  15. Ryden B., Edberg J.O. Large Mergers in Sweden, 1962–1976. In: The Determinants and Effects of Mergers: An International Comparison. Mueller D.C. (ed.). Cambridge, Mass., Oelgeschlager, Gunn&Hain, 1980, pp. 193–226.
  16. Seth A., Song K., Pettit R. Synergy, Materialism or Hubris? An Empirical Examination of Motives for Foreign Acquisitions of US Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 2000, no. 31, pp. 387–405.
  17. Sirower M.L. The Synergy Trap: How Companies Lose the Acquisition Game. New York, Free Press, 1997.
  18. Generalova N.V. MSFO i dostovernost' bukhgalterskoi otchetnosti [IFRS and the reliability of financial statements]. Finansy i biznes = Finance and Business, 2010, no. 2, pp. 142–148.
  19. Generalova N.V., Sokolova N.A. Logika priznaniya i pervonachal'noi otsenki gudvilla po MSFO [The logic of initial recognition and measurement of goodwill under IFRS]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2014, no. 7, pp. 22–40.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive