+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Prioritization and evaluation of technological condition of enterprises when implementing modernization projects

Vol. 14, Iss. 10, MARCH 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 9 March 2015

Subject Heading: ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CONDITION OF ENTERPRISES

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 26-35

Ryzhikova T.N. Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
tnr411@yandex.ru

Borovskii V.G. Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
borovskiy@inatek.ru

Importance The sanctions imposed by some countries, designed to complicate the economic situation in Russia, give the chance to domestic businesses quickly and effectively upgrade the industry. The article deals with the elements of prioritization and assessment of the condition of enterprises in projects of modernization of the machine-building enterprises of the Russian Federation at the present stage, typical of the domestic market.
     Objectives The aim of the study is to examine the issues of prioritization and evaluation of technological condition of the enterprises when implementing modernization projects.
     Methods Using econometric methods, the authors analyze various aspects of the modernization of the machine-building enterprises; identify the most effective approaches to the assessment of enterprises, and exercise their benchmarking analysis.
     Results The study assessed the modernization priority based on the analysis of the significance of the enterprise for the Russian economy. The authors conduct a comprehensive technical evaluation of the previously installed systems and equipment, as well as the existing technological procedures. They selected the type of upgrade. Through comparison with the world activities indicators, the authors estimate the economic potential of modernization, production growth and cost reduction.
     Conclusions and Relevance The authors conclude that the procedure of modernization consists of three main phases: pre-project, project, and post-project. The correct prioritization and evaluation of technological condition of the enterprises when implementing modernization projects will help using State guarantees and will make the project more viable upgrade.

Keywords: modernization, manufacturing, enterprises, machine building, machine-tool construction

References:

  1. Borisov V.N., Pochukaeva O.V. Innovatsionno-tekhnologicheskoe razvitie mashinostroeniya kak faktor innovatsionnogo sovershenstvovaniya obrabatyvayushchei promyshlennosti [Innovative-technological development of mechanical engineering as a factor of innovation perfection of the manufacturing industry]. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2009, no. 4, pp. 37–45.
  2. Borisov V.N., Pochukaeva O.V. Innovatsionnoe razvitie mashinostroeniya [Innovation development of mechanical engineering]. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2013, no. 1, pp. 38–51.
  3. Borovskii G.V. Razvitie mashinostroeniya v Rossii na osnove tekhnologicheskogo perevooruzheniya [Development of the mechanical engineering in Russia on the basis of technological re-equipment]. Moscow, ITO Publ., 2009, 216 p.
  4. Kroll A., Simon F., Chiver G., Pilbakka T., Stanier D. Pole dlya modernizatsii. O vyyavlenii sderzhivayushchikh faktorov v obrabatyvayushchei promyshlennosti [Room for improvement. Identifying the limiting factors in processing industries]. ABB Revyu = ABB Review, 2007, no. 1, pp. 56–61.
  5. Pil'nov G., Tarasova O., Yanovskii A. Kak provodit' tekhnologicheskii audit? [How to conduct technological audit?]. Available at: Link}. (In Russ.)
  6. Ryzhikova T.N., Borovskii V.G. Problemy modernizatsii mashinostroitel'nykh predpriyatii Rossii na sovremennom etape [The modernization problems of the Russian machine-building enterprises at the present stage]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 17, pp. 23–29.
  7. Saifieva S.N., Ermilina D.A. Rossiiskoe mashinostroenie: sostoyanie i tendentsii [The Russian mechanical engineering: the condition and tendencies]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2012, no. 2, pp. 32–43.
  8. Strel'nikova I.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. Osobennosti i otsenka realizuemosti investitsionnykh proektov sozdaniya naukoemkoi innovatsionnoi produktsii [Knowledge-based innovation products: investment projects' feasibility evaluation]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 21, pp. 40–50.
  9. Tekhnologicheskii audit i modernizatsiya mashinostroitel'nykh predpriyatii [Technological audit and the modernization of machine-building enterprises]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  10. Khrustalev E.Yu. Mekhanizmy reformirovaniya i innovatsionno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya naukoemkogo proizvodstvennogo kompleksa [Mechanisms of reformation and innovation-and-technology development of the high-tech industrial complex]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 9, pp. 2–10.
  11. Khrustalev E.Yu., Sokolov N.A., Khrustalev O.E. Kontseptsiya otsenki i upravleniya riskom pri realizatsii innovatsionnykh proektov sozdaniya intellektual'noi produktsii [A concept of risk assessment and management in the implementation of innovation projects to create intelligent products]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2013, no. 44, pp. 2–13.
  12. Khrustalev E.Yu., Khrustalev O.E. Metodologiya i instrumentarii kompleksnoi otsenki, restrukturizatsii i integratsii naukoemkikh promyshlennykh predpriyatii [A methodology and tools of integrated assessment, restructuring and integration of knowledge-based industries]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 1, pp. 2–17.
  13. Blackler F., McDonald S. Power, mastery and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 2000, no. 37, pp. 833–852.
  14. Brown J.S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 1991, no. 2, pp. 40–57.
  15. Chesborough H. Towards a Dynamics of Modularity. A Cyclical Model of Technical Advance. In: The Business of Systems Integration. In Prencipe A., Hobday M. and Davies A. (Eds). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 174–200.
  16. Lin N. Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. In: Social Capital: Theory and Research. Lin N., Cook K., Burt R.S. (Eds). New York, Aldine de Gruyter, 2000, pp. 3–30.
  17. Ryzhikova T.N., Borovsky V.G. The paradigm of modernization of machine building enterprises of the Russian Federation at the modern stage. Controlling in SMEs – Beyond Numbers. University of Finance and Administration Prague Proceedings of the International Conference. Prague, April 25, 2014, pp. 364–371.
  18. Sabel C. Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development. The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg (Eds). Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994, pp. 137–165.
  19. The Facts about Modern Manufacturing. 7th Edition. The Manufacturing Institute, 2007. Available at: Link.
  20. The Facts about Modern Manufacturing. 8th Edition. The Manufacturing Institute, 2009. Available at: Link.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive