Subject This article considers the issues related to the accumulation of public debt of the Russian Federation subjects. Objectives To test for debt sustainability at the regional level, we use a model-based approach proposed by Bohn and the panel data of the Russian Federation fifty constituent entities for 2006–2017. Bohn's test looks for positive reaction of the primary surplus to the debt at the start of the period. Such a reaction confirms the debtor's fiscal solvency. Methods The article estimates the model of panel data with fixed effects by least squares with dummy variables involving diagnostic tests. Results Bohn's test resulted in negative and statistically insignificant reaction, which indicated fiscal insolvency at the regional level. The primary surplus reacts positively to the regional output and negatively to temporary budget expenditures. Conclusions Fiscal insolvency is not manifested in real default on securities and expenditure commitments of regional governments. It is absorbed by the federal budget through the system of soft budget constraints at both levels of government.
Keywords: fiscal sustainability, Bohn's test
References:
Hamilton J.D., Flavin M.A. On the Limitation of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Empirical Testing. The American Economic Review, 1986, vol. 76, iss. 4, pp. 808–819. URL: Link
Bohn H. The Sustainability of Budget Deficits in a Stochastic Economy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1995, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 257–271. URL: Link
Bohn H. The Behavior of U.S. Public Debt and Deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 113, iss. 3, pp. 949–963. URL: Link
Bohn H. The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy in the United States. CESifo Working Paper, April, 2005, no. 1446. URL: Link
Mendoza E.G., Ostry J.D. International Evidence on Fiscal Solvency: Is Fiscal Policy “Responsible”? Journal of Monetary Economics, 2008, vol. 55, iss. 6, pp. 1081–1093. URL: Link
Claeys P., Ramos R., Suriñach J. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers. International Economics and Economic Policy, 2008, vol. 5, iss. 1-2, pp. 139–163. URL: Link
Rodden J.A., Eskeland G.S., Litvack J. Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2003, 486 p.
Kornai J., Maskin E., Roland G. Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 2003,vol. 41, iss. 4, pp. 1095–1136. URL: Link
Oates W.E. On the Theory and Practice of Fiscal Decentralization. IFIR Working Paper, no. 2006-05, May 2006. URL: Link
Sinel'nikov-Murylev S.G., Kadochnikov P.A., Trunin I.V. et al. Problema myagkikh byudzhetnykh ogranichenii rossiiskikh regional'nykh vlastei: monografiya [The problem of soft budget constraints of the Russian regional authorities: a monograph]. Moscow, Institute for Economy in Transition Publ., 2006, 300 p.
Levin A., Lin Ch.-F., Chu Ch.-S.J. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 2002, vol. 108, iss. 1, pp. 1–24. URL: Link00098-7
Torres-Reyna O. Panel Data Analysis. Fixed and Random Effects Using Stata (v. 4.2). Princeton, Princeton University, 2007. URL: Link