Krupina N.N.Institute of Service, Tourism and Design, Branch of North Caucasian Federal University, Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Krai, Russian Federation krupina_n17@mail.ru
Importance The research focuses on specific functions that contribute to barrier capabilities of the regulatory area of the industrial enterprise subject to a special regime of land use, i.e. sanitary protection zone. The article refers to factors and premises for forming barrier capabilities of the sanitary protection zone. These capabilities are regarded as a combination of the availability and sufficiency of its assets to perform a set of sanitary, hygienic, nature protection, city planning regulatory requirements and coordinate them with landscape, esthetic, information and other publicly important results and effects. Objectives The research presents fundamentals for the concept of barrier capabilities of the sanitary protection zone as the theoretical basis to evaluate them, and a probable innovative tool to manage nature protection aspects of production for purposes of the development of urban areas and convergence with global standards. Methods The research employs a systems analysis, statistical, regulatory methods, environmental, economic and expert evaluation of barrier capabilities of the sanitary protection zone. Results The article discusses approaches to spatial planning of sanitary protection zones and requirements to selection of specific green assets for each functional plot. I propose the typology of sanitary protection sub-zones, substantiate areas and key indicators to evaluate the extent to which functions of capabilities' components prevail, i.e. environmental, landscape, sanitary and hygienic, barrier and contact, monitoring, architectural and esthetic, utility and back-up. The research determines the role and place of respective functional assets in working sanitary protection sub-zones. I suggest using the matrix for positioning barrier capabilities of the sanitary protection zone as an innovative tool for strategic planning of assets management, and demonstrate how it can be used. Conclusions and Relevance The findings are applicable to urban, regional and municipal governance, reasonable use of natural resources and arrangement for nature protection at industrial enterprises, educational, methodological and information activities.
Grivanova S.M., Guzenko A.G., Odiyako N.N. Modelirovanie i nakoplenie vrednykh veshchestv v atmosfernom vozdukhe ot otopitel'nykh kotel'nykh [Modeling and accumulation of hazardous substances exhausted into the air from boiler plants]. Ekologicheskie sistemy i pribory = Ecological Systems and Devices, 2004, no. 7, pp. 39–44.
Baitelova A.I. Otsenka izmeneniya kachestva atmosfery urbanizirovannoi territorii (na primere promyshlennogo raiona g. Orenburga) [Evaluating changes in the air quality in the urban area: Evidence from the industrial district of the City of Orenburg]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vestnik of Orenburg State University, 2004, no. 9, pp. 90–97.
Weslynne A. Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems A Social Network Approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 34–51.
Jacobsen N.B., Anderberg S. Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiotic Networks. The Case of Kalundborg. In: Economics of Industrial Ecology: Materials Structural Change, and Spatial Scales. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2004, pp. 331–335.
Howard E. Goroda budushchego [Garden Cities of To-morrow]. Moscow, Sakura Publ., 1992, 177 p.
Radnaeva V.Zh., Medvedev S.N. K voprosu o kompleksnoi rekonstruktsii elementov gorodskoi sredy [On the issue of comprehensive reconstruction of urban environment components]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2012, no. 9, pp. 157–161.
Parnreiter C. Megacities in the Geography of Global Economic Governance. DieErde, 2009, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 371–390.
Gorodkov A.V. Ekologo-gradostroitel'nye aspekty optimizatsii sistem sredozashchitnogo ozeleneniya krupnykh gorodov [Environmental and urban construction aspects of optimizing urban greening systems for environmental protection]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Stroitel'stvo = News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction, 2000, no. 5, p. 98.
Podkolzin M.M. Etapy formirovaniya ozelenennykh territorii v usloviyakh tekhnogennoi nagruzki [Green areas formation and ecological footprint]. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Ser. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki = Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series Natural and Technical Sciences, 2012, no. 4-5, pp. 60–65.
Kulakova S.A. Otsenka sostoyaniya zelenykh nasazhdenii goroda [Evaluating the condition of urban plants]. Geograficheskii vestnik. Ser. Ekologiya i prirodopol'zovanie = Geophysical Bulletin. Series Environment and Use of Natural Resources, 2012, no. 4, pp. 59–66.
Glazychev V.L. Sotsial'no-ekologicheskaya interpretatsiya gorodskoi sredy: monografiya [Social and ecological interpretation of the urban environment: a monograph]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, p. 58.
