International Accounting
 

Reform of VAT and the unified agricultural tax

Vol. 20, Iss. 17, SEPTEMBER 2017

Received: 23 January 2017

Received in revised form: 6 February 2017

Accepted: 20 February 2017

Available online: 20 September 2017

Subject Heading: Tax and taxation

JEL Classification: H21, H25, H30

Pages: 991–1003

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.20.17.991

Davletshin T.G. OOO Burovye i Neftepromyslovye Nasosy (Oil-rig and oilfield pumps), Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
shentmz@yandex.ru

Subject The article addresses specifics of taxation of agricultural producers, the tax burden and financial results, depending on tax regimes.
Objectives The purpose of the study is to analyze the level of taxation of agricultural producers.
Methods The paper employs general scientific approaches and methods.
Results I performed a comprehensive analysis of the tax system applied in the Russian agriculture, studied the role of VAT accounting as the main reason for difference in tax burden assessment. Agricultural organizations applying the unified agricultural tax have a higher tax burden as compared with those under the general tax regime. They also have a higher level of costs, since the VAT paid on the acquisition of resources is not refunded but is classified as the cost of production and sales. As a result, agricultural producers under special tax regimes are non-competitive as those under the general tax regime.
Conclusions Special tax regimes in the agricultural sector do not meet the goal to reduce the tax burden and create more favorable economic and financial conditions for agricultural commodity producers. It is crucial to change the Tax Code and harmonize tax regimes.

Keywords: general taxation system, unified agricultural tax, tax harmonization, value added tax, indirect tax

References:

  1. Tufetulov A.M., Davletshin T.G., Salmina S.V. [Analyzing the influence of special regimes on financial performance of small businesses]. Nalogovyi Vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 2014, no. 10, pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)
  2. Tufetulov A.M., Davletshin T.G., Sinnikova Yu.M. [Problems and prospects for special regime application for agricultural producers]. Nalogovyi Vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 2013, no. 3, pp. 53–58. (In Russ.)
  3. Chesnokova L.A., Yashina N.I. [Tax burden in the agricultural sector of the Russian Federation and the need to change it]. Finansy i upravlenie = Finance and Management, 2016, no. 2, pp. 118–124. (In Russ.)
  4. Tikhonova A.V. [Tax regulation in the agricultural sector: Assessment and problems]. Izvestiya Baikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Baikal State University, 2014, no. 6, pp. 25–34. (In Russ.)
  5. Shelkunov A.D. [The VAT neutrality principle and court practice approaches]. Zakon = Law, 2014, no. 4, pp. 159–164. (In Russ.)
  6. Davletshin T.G. [Neutrality of VAT and harmonization of tax regimes]. Nalogovyi Vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 2015, no. 10, pp. 64–67. (In Russ.)
  7. Orobinskaya I.V. [Integrated organizations of the AIC as subjects of tax relations: Specifics of tax benefits]. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Tax and Taxation, 2013, no. 4, pp. 245–255. (In Russ.)
  8. Orobinskaya I.V. [Evaluation and selection of the most efficient tax regime for integrated agribusiness groups]. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaistvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatii = Economy of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises, 2013, no. 3, pp. 50–52. (In Russ.)
  9. Pilipenko A.A. [Tax planning (optimization): Modeling the scientific approaches]. Nalogi = Taxes, 2012, no. 3, pp. 10–14. (In Russ.)
  10. Ermakova M.S. [Specific features of accounting policy formation for agricultural holding taxation]. Finansy i upravlenie = Finance and Management, 2013, no. 2, pp. 77–105. (In Russ.)
  11. Troshin A.V. [A comparative analysis of methods to determine the tax burden on enterprises]. Finansy = Finance, 2000, no. 5, pp. 44–54. (In Russ.)
  12. Panskov V.G. [Problems of value-added taxation]. Nalogovyi Vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 2003, no. 5, pp. 31–33. (In Russ.)
  13. Il'in A.Yu. [Legal content of types, forms and methods of tax control]. Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2014, no. 1, pp. 28–34. (In Russ.)
  14. Ruchkina G.F., Terekhova E.V. [General and controversial aspects of legal regulation of the value added tax]. Yuridicheskii mir = Juridical World, 2014, no. 1, pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)
  15. Tsidilina I.A. [On unification of statutory regulation of indirect taxation under Russia's integration into the world community]. Nalogi = Taxes, 2014, no. 2, pp. 43–45. (In Russ.)
  16. Gurvich E.T., Suslina A.L. [Dynamics of tax collection in Russia: A macroeconomic approach]. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2015, no. 4, pp. 22–33. (In Russ.)
  17. Batsenkov N.N. [Analyzing the practice of tax and judicial agencies in consideration of disputes on VAT collection]. Finansovoe pravo.= Financial Law, 2015, no. 4, pp. 43–48. (In Russ.)
  18. Vakhitov P.P. [VAT refund in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights]. Nalogoved, 2006, no. 1, pp. 19–22. (In Russ.)
  19. Gorskii I.V. [The tax policy of Russia at the beginning of the 21st century]. Nalogovyi vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 2007, no. 7, pp. 9–13. (In Russ.)
  20. Demin A.V. [The certainty of taxation as a fundamental principle of the tax law]. Voprosy pravovedeniya = Issues of Law, 2012, no. 1, pp. 158–173. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 21, Iss. 9
September 2018

Archive