+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

International experience in performance budgeting development and introduction

Vol. 22, Iss. 33, SEPTEMBER 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 28 July 2016

Received in revised form: 11 August 2016

Accepted: 25 August 2016

Available online: 19 September 2016

Subject Heading: BUDGET REGULATION

JEL Classification: E61, E62, H60, H68

Pages: 48-60

Khanafina K.A. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation
kerushka89@gmail.com

Importance Recognition of the need to apply principles of efficient and responsible management of public and municipal finance at the international level stipulated the use of new approaches to budget process. Within these approaches, the budget process and budget reforms are focused on pursuing a responsible fiscal policy, using mid-term and long-term budgetary planning to ensure financial stability and efficiency of public expenditure and increase responsibility for results of budgetary funds utilization.
Objectives The study aims to analyze the development and implementation of budget policy in foreign countries and assess a possibility of applying best practices to Russian budget formation.
Methods The methodology rests on general and special methods of scientific knowledge, like empirical research (comparison, data collection and investigation), comparative study, synthesis of theoretical and practical materials, classification, system approach. I analyzed laws and regulations, methodological materials, scientific literature, statistical data, expert and analytical reports of controlling authorities.
Results The paper presents proposals for implementing foreign experience in the budgeting process in Russia. The findings may be applied by public authorities and local governments in public and municipal finance management within the budgetary process, lawmakers developing the budgetary legislation of the Russian Federation, scientists, teachers and students of higher schools involved in academic research activities.
Conclusions and Relevance International experience can be useful during transition to performance budgeting in Russia. However, it is important to consider the specifics of social and economic development and budgetary policy of the country, and availability of peculiar external and internal factors.

Keywords: budget policy, macroeconomic balance, steady budget, result-based budgeting, performance budgeting

References:

  1. Starikova T.V. [A role of strategic budgetary planning in increasing the level of social and economic development of the State]. Vestnik MGOU = Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University, 2013, no. 3. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  2. Voprosy byudzhetno-nalogovogo federalizma v Rossii i SShA: Materialy rossiisko-amerikanskikh seminarov [Issues related to fiscal federalism in Russia and the USA. Materials of Russian-American seminars]. Moscow, AMR SShA Publ., 1996.
  3. Afanas'ev M.P., Alekhin B.I., Kravchenko A.I., Kradinov P.G. [Technology of program-based budget preparation]. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2010, no. 3, pp. 5–18. (In Russ.)
  4. Shah A. Budgeting and Budgetary Institutions. World Bank, Public Sector. Governance and Accountability Series. Available at: Link.
  5. Shah A. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Canada: An Overview. In: R. Jayanta (ed.) Macroeconomic Management and Fiscal Decentralization. EDI Seminar Series, the World Bank, Washington D.C., 1995.
  6. Shah A. The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies. Available at: Link.
  7. Perotti R. Estimating the Effects of Fiscal Policy in OECD Countries. CEPR Discussion Paper, 2005, no. 4842. Available at: Link.
  8. Finansovye strategii modernizatsii ekonomiki: mirovaya praktika [Financial strategies of economy modernization: Best practice]. Moscow, Magistr Publ., 2015, 496 p.
  9. Barber M. Three Paradigms of Public Sector Reform. London, McKinsey & Company, 2007. Available at: Link.
  10. Volkov A., Gutnik A., Kvashnin Yu., Olenchenko V., Shchedrin A. [Overcoming the crisis phenomena in some EU countries]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2015, no. 3, pp. 3–47. (In Russ.)
  11. Canning D., Pedroni P. Infrastructure, Long-Run Economic Growth and Causality Tests for Cointegrated Panels. Manchester School, 2008, vol. 76, iss. 5, pp. 504–527. Available at: Link.
  12. Gray Ch., Lane T., Varoudakis A. Byudzhetnaya politika i ekonomicheskii rost v perekhodnykh stranakh [Budgetary policy and economic growth in transitional States]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  13. Sapir J. [The French economy in 2014: A market crisis and a structural crisis]. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting, 2015, no. 2, pp. 93–107. (In Russ.)
  14. Jesse F. Folly from Olly. The Disastrous Quality of the Economic Predictions of the European Commission. Available at: Link.
  15. Balikhina N.V., Kosov M.E. [Fiscal regulation of the investment activity of the Russian economy]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of Interior of Russia, 2013, no. 11, pp. 186–191. (In Russ.)
  16. Kosov M.E., Akhmadeev R.G. Foreign Experience of Tax Stimulation of Innovative Activity. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Economic Sciences. Vienna, East West Association for Advanced Studies and Higher Education GmbH, 2015, pp. 67–73.
  17. Kosov M.E., Akhmadeev R.G. Offshore Jurisdictions as an Instrument for International Tax Planning. Europaische Fachhochschule, 2016, no. 4, pp. 46–48.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive