Subject. The article addresses methodology and practice of comprehensive assessment of economic efficiency, environmental, social responsibility, and organizational management. Objectives. The study aims at comprehensive consideration of problems of information and methodological support to ESG assessment of companies as a tool of responsible investment, identification of ways to improve the quality of ESG performance assessment to make fully informed, ESG-conscious, and strategically valuable investment decisions. Methods. The study employs methods of systems, complex, comparative, structural, and logical analysis. I performed a content analysis of approaches to the formation of ESG ratings of the world's leading rating agencies. The paper gives a comparative assessment of the content of major foreign and domestic ESG ratings. Results. The paper considers prerequisites for improving the quality of ESG assessment related to shortcomings of information and methodological support for the analysis of sustainable development, underpins the main areas for improving the ESG assessment, offers an approach to comprehensive assessment of company's sustainable development that complements ESG ratings and involves in-depth research on priority issues of sustainable development. Conclusions. Priority areas for improving the quality of ESG assessment include harmonization of sustainable development reporting standards, consistent transition to mandatory preparation of ESG reporting, elaboration of a standardized list of ESG reporting indicators, development of the institution of independent external confirmation of ESG reporting. It is crucial to increase transparency, validity, and objectivity of methodological approaches to ESG assessment. A comprehensive assessment that involves in-depth analysis on priority issues, enables to overcome the shortcomings of the ESG rating assessment, and, is, therefore, a more reliable basis for informed investment decisions.
Amel-Zadeh A., Serafeim G. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysis Journal, 2018, vol. 74, iss. 3, pp. 87–103. URL: Link
Cort T., Esty D. ESG Standards: Looming challenges and pathways forward. Organization & Environment, 2020, vol. 33, iss. 4, pp. 491–510. URL: Link
Jonsdottir B., Sigurjonsson T.O., Johannsdottir L., Wendt S. Barriers to Using ESG Data for Investment Decisions. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, iss. 9. URL: Link
Babicheva N.E., Semkin S.A. [Integrated reporting as a determinant of changing the targets of economic analysis of sustainable development in the face of challenges]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2021, vol. 20, iss. 12, pp. 2210–2232. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Soh Young In, Rook D., Monk A. Integrating Alternative Data (Also Known as ESG Data) in Investment Decision Making. Global Econnomic Review, 2019, vol. 48, iss. 3, pp. 237–260. URL: Link
Junius D., Adisurjo A., Rijanto Y.A., Adelina Y.E. The impact of ESG performance to Firm Performance and Market Value. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 2020, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 21–41. URL: Link
Sang Kim, Zhichuan (Frank) Li. Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, iss. 7. URL: Link
Serafeim G., Yoon A. Stock Price Reactions to ESG News: The Role of ESG Ratings and Disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies, 2023, vol. 28, pp. 1500–1530. URL: Link
Zenkina I.V. [Methodological approaches and tools to analyze the sustainable development of a company]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2019, vol. 18, iss. 9, pp. 1667–1686. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Karyakin A.M., Velikorossov V.V., Filin S.A., Tarasova A.S. [Rating methodology for energy company's sustainable development]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2023, vol. 22, iss. 7, pp. 1309–1329. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Chatterji A.K., Durand R., Levine D.I., Touboul S. Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, vol. 37, iss. 8, pp. 1597–1614. URL: Link
Gibson Brandon R., Krueger P., Schmidt P.S. ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 2021, vol. 77, iss. 4, pp. 104–127. URL: Link
Christensen D.M., Serafeim G., Sikochi A. Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 2022, vol. 97, iss. 1, pp. 147–175. URL: Link
Del Giudice A., Rigamonti S. Does audit improve the quality of ESG scores? Evidence from corporate misconduct. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 14. URL: Link
Escrig-Olmedo E., Fernandez-Izquierdo M., Ferrero-Ferrero I. et al. Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, iss. 3. URL: Link
Berg F., Koelbel J.F., Rigobon R. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 2022, vol. 26, iss. 6, pp. 1315–1344. URL: Link
