Subject. Remote work as a factor in the spatial mobility of human capital. Objectives. Comparing different remote work setups, identifying the pros and cons of new ways of organizing work. Methods. General scientific research methods were applied. Results. Permanent remote work basically eliminates commuting labor migration and leads to an increase in long-term interregional population movements. Temporary remote work (partially remote, hybrid jobs) reduces cyclic movements within settlements in favor of commuting between settlements (mainly along the 'city – suburb' route). The key feature of remote work is that an employee, according to their employment contract, performs their job duties from an alternative workplace outside the employer's direct control and uses modern communication tools and the Internet to exchange work results with the employer. Conclusions. The widespread adoption of remote work has both positive and negative effects on the stability of spatial development, so when developing overall state policy on remote work, it’s worth allowing for regional-level “targeted” decisions aimed at supporting new forms of work organization.
Keywords: non-standard employment, remote work, distance work, hybrid work, spatial development, human capital
References:
Galenko V.P., Plis K.S. [Mobility of human capital as a factor of increase of stability of economic development of the enterprise and the country]. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2018, vol. 12, iss. 8, pp. 1089–1096. (In Russ.) EDN: KYPODF
Eremina I.Yu., Chuprova A.V., Sheshina A.A. [The impact of adaptation and mobility of the human capital on development of innovative processes in the oil and gas companies]. Normirovanie i oplata truda v promyshlennosti, 2021, no. 2, pp. 16–21. (In Russ.) EDN: FXUNWZ
Mazin A.L., Troitskaya A.A. [The potential of labour mobility as a component of employee's human capital]. Ekonomika truda, 2020, vol. 7, iss. 4, pp. 321–336. (In Russ.) EDN: DSPYMG
Abramchikova N.V., Melnikov P.V. [Actions of state support for the mobility of human capital as one of the special projects of the state]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya, 2021, no. 12, pp. 9–16. (In Russ.) EDN: FTUDHP
Bryukhina E.R. [Remote (remote) work as a digital segment of the labor market: problems and prospects]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2021, no. 1, pp. 80–89. (In Russ.) EDN: TMZYYE
Fedchenko A.A. [Remote work in the context of digital technologies: prospects for transformation]. Ekonomika truda, 2021, vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 377–390. (In Russ.) EDN: NJAHIW
Plotnikov A.V., Bragina D.S. [Remote work in the context of a pandemic and the impact of self-employment on the shadow labor market]. Moskovskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 2021, no. 5. (In Russ.) EDN: HEFFTN
Loktyukhina N.V., Chernykh E.A. [Quality of working life of remote employees: methodological approaches and first assessments for the EU and Russia]. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2021, vol. 17, iss. 1, pp. 42–56. (In Russ.) EDN: LVZFLZ
Glushchenko G.I. [Development of virtual migration in the context of the ongoing digitalization]. Demograficheskie issledovaniya, 2021, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 57–64. (In Russ.) EDN: GDMVRE
Rogozinskaya N.A., Rogozinskiy I.A. [“Dacha prospect” of remote working]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya, 2021, no. 2, pp. 87–106. (In Russ.) EDN: BREOQZ
