Subject. Population concentration in large urban areas, formation of depopulation zones. Objectives. Analysis of the settlement system features within the borders of the Kazan agglomeration. Methods. Correlation analysis. Results. A strong correlation has been found between the pace of housing development and how close the settlement system is to optimal parameters. In areas located 40–50 km from the core of the agglomeration, low-rise construction is effective in terms of balancing settlement. It's necessary to synchronize individual housing construction with infrastructure development. Conclusions. The results obtained can be used by federal and regional authorities when developing spatial development strategies and adjusting preferential lending mechanisms.
Rastvortseva S.N., Manaeva I.V. [Zipf’s law for Russian cities: analysis of new indicators]. Ekonomika regiona, 2020, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 935–947. (In Russ.) EDN: EBRAXH
Krugman P. Confronting the Mystery of Urban Hierarchy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1996, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 399–418. DOI:10.1006/jjie.1996.0023
Gabaix X. «Zipf’s Law for Cities: An Explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, vol. 114, iss. 3, pp. 739–767. EDN: DCIZVF
Ioannides Y.M., Overman H.G. Zipf’s Law for Cities: An Empirical Examination. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2003, vol. 33, iss.2, pp. 127–137. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-0462(02)00006-6
Berry B.J., Okulicz‐Kozaryn A. The City Size Distribution Debate: Resolution for US Urban Regions and Megalopolitan Areas. Cities, 2012, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 17–23. EDN: PGNXLB
Ziqin W. Zipf Law Analysis of Urban Scale in China. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 2016, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 53–58. DOI: 10.20849/ajsss.v1i1.21
Black D., Henderson V. Urban Evolution in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography, 2003, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 343–372. EDN: ISSJTR
Eeckhout J. Gibrat’s Law for (All) Cities: Reply. American Economic Review, 2009, vol. 99, iss. 4, pp. 1676–1683. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.4.1676
Levy M. Gibrat’s Law for (All) Cities: Comment. American Economic Review, 2009, vol. 99, iss. 4, pp. 1672–1675. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.4.1672
Bee M., Riccaboni M., Schiavo S. The Size Distribution of US Cities: Not Pareto, Even in the Tail. Economics Letters, 2013, vol. 120, iss. 2, pp. 232–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.035
Schaffar A., Dimou M. Rank-size City Dynamics in China and India, 1981–2004. Regional Studies, 2012, vol. 46, iss. 6, pp. 707–721. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.521146
Andreev V.V., Lukiyanova V.Yu., Kadyshev E.N. [Analysis of people territorial distribution in regions of the Volga Federal District on the base of Zipf and Gibrat laws]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika, 2017, no. 4, pp. 97–121. (In Russ.) EDN: ZVRMXB
Manaeva I.V. [Distribution of cities in federal districts of Russia: testing of the Zipf law]. Ekonomika regiona, 2019, vol. 15, iss. 1, pp. 84–98. (In Russ.) EDN: ZALWUX
Pavlov Yu.V. [Regional settlement system balance: assessment under Zipf’s law and impact on the regional development]. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya, 2020, vol. 8, iss. 2. (In Russ.) EDN: MRDUYZ