+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Divergence of ESG ratings: Methodological sources and data quality

ISSUE 4, APRIL 2026

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 12 January 2026

Accepted: 10 February 2026

Available online: 29 April 2026

Subject Heading: THEORY OF REGIONAL ECONOMY

JEL Classification: G11, G14, G32, M14, Q56

Pages: 16-31

https://doi.org/10.24891/fubysr

Elena Yu. VETOSHKINA Corresponding author, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (KFU), Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
ejvetoshkina@kpfu.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-8150

Anton A. TERENT’EV Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (KFU), Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
anaterentev@kpfu.ru

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3245-8157

Subject. Indices and ESG ratings as elements of the financial market infrastructure, methodological and institutional reasons for discrepancies in ESG assessments between providers.
Objectives. Identifying the causes of divergence in ESG ratings and indexes, as well as the limitations that hinder their proper use in investment, regulatory, and research practice.
Methods. Methods of logical analysis, typologization, and systematization were used.
Results. It has been shown that the divergence of ESG ratings is of a structural nature and is mainly due to differences in the measurement of indicators, thematic coverage, and aggregation mechanisms. It has been established that aggregated ESG scores cannot be considered as universal indicators of sustainability. The specifics of the Russian ESG ratings market have been identified, and institutional constraints on the participation of Russian companies in global ESG frameworks after 2022 have been revealed.
Conclusions. A typology of ESG instruments is necessary, and it is required to increase the transparency of assessment methodologies and the quality of non-financial data. An important task is the development of disclosure standards and external assurance of ESG information.

Keywords: ESG ratings, divergence of ESG scores, non-financial reporting, sustainable development, corporate governance

References:

  1. Chatterji A.K., Durand R., Levine D.I., Touboul S. Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, vol. 37, iss. 8, pp. 1597–1614. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2407
  2. Berg F., Kölbel J.F., Rigobon R. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 2022, vol. 26, iss. 6, pp. 1315–1344. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfac033
  3. Hartzmark S.M., Sussman A.B. Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows. The Journal of Finance, 2019, vol. 74, iss. 6, pp. 2783–2837. DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12841
  4. Agosto A., Tanda A. Divergence and Aggregation of ESG Ratings: A Survey. Open Research Europe, 2025, vol. 5, iss. 28. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.19238.2
  5. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick E., Bennett S., Lehnherr R., Zhong A. ESG Rating Disagreement: Implications and Aggregation Approaches. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, vol. 96, iss. 6. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103532
  6. Abhayawansa S., Tyagi S. Sustainable Investing: The Black Box of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Ratings. The Journal of Wealth Management, 2021, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 49–54. DOI: 10.3905/jwm.2021.1.130
  7. Muck M., Schmidl T. Comparing ESG Score Weighting Approaches and Stock Performance Differentiation. Finance Research Letters, 2024, vol. 67. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105924
  8. Liu M. Quantitative ESG Disclosure and Divergence of ESG Ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936798
  9. Teng H., Zhang J., Li X., Li B. ESG Rating Divergence and Future Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025, vol. 108. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104686
  10. Wang D., Liu S., Zhan F. et al. ESG Rating Divergence and Corporate Business Risk. Journal of Competitiveness, 2025, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 240–270. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2025.02.10
  11. Christensen H.B., Hail L., Leuz C. Mandatory CSR and Sustainability Reporting: Economic Analysis and Literature Review. Review of Accounting Studies, 2021, vol. 26, iss. 3, pp. 1176–1248. DOI: 10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  12. Khachatryan H.V. [Divergence of ESG ratings: foreign regulatory trends]. Finansovyi zhurnal, 2022, vol. 14, iss. 5, pp. 89–104. (In Russ.) EDN: MZPCSW
  13. Babkin A.V., Salimova T.A., Soldatova E.V. [ESG-ratings: development trends, international and national practices]. π-Economy, 2023, vol. 16, iss. 6, pp. 77–92. (In Russ.) EDN: IYROPF
  14. Afanas’ev M.P., Shash N.N. [ESG transformation in the corporate sector: systematizing the global approach]. Problemy prognozirovaniya, 2022, no. 6, pp. 185–197. (In Russ.) EDN: WJPSZH
  15. Nosko P.A. [Analysis of ESG ratings’ methodologies in the Russian market: transparency and convergence issues]. Sovremennaya mirovaya ekonomika, 2024, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 60–75. (In Russ.) EDN: JRNWMW
  16. Efimova O.V. [ESG ratings: issues of formation and application]. Vestnik Akademii znanii, 2023, no. 4, pp. 104–109. (In Russ.) EDN: XYNYSC
  17. Babaeva Zh.R. [ESG ratings of Russian oil and gas companies]. Vestnik IPB (Vestnik professional'nykh bukhgalterov), 2022, no. 2, pp. 34–40. (In Russ.) EDN: PRHTMF
  18. Romanova A.A., Perepelkin V.A., Romanov P.A. [ESG ratings and investment efficiency]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2025, vol. 8, iss. 250, pp. 33–42. (In Russ.) EDN: EYTEHR
  19. Ge Y., Zhang R., Zhu H. Green Investors and ESG Ratings Divergence. Scientific Reports, 2025, vol. 15, iss. 1. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-05329-x

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

ISSUE 4
APRIL 2026

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!