Subject. This article discusses the issues of protection of the sovereignty of states in the context of globalization of economic relations. Objectives. The article aims to conduct a critical analysis of the main approaches to ensuring international economic security. Methods. For the study, I used the general scientific research methods. Results. The article formulates the basic principles of sustainable economic security emphasizing that in the 21st century, economic sovereignty cannot mean autarky and should be understood as the ability of a state to independently determine its development model. Conclusions. In today's context, it is necessary to find a balance between national priorities and international commitments.
Dudin M.N., Nevmyvako V.P. [Mechanisms of imbalance of the economic system, deteriorating its safety, and ways to overcome them]. Ekonomika i sotsium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya, 2017, no. 16, pp. 5–14. (In Russ.) EDN: ZSWONH
Brooks D.J. What is Security: Definition Through Knowledge Categorization. Security Journal, 2010, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 225–239. DOI: 10.1057/sj.2008.18
Zubko T. Development of the Methodology for Evaluating the Economic Security of the Entrepreneurship in the International Trade System. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2022, vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 6–9. DOI:10.15587/2706-5448.2022.263535
Sachs J.D. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York, Columbia University Press, 2015, 543 p.
Drobot E.V., Gudovich G.K., Makarov I.N., Bakhmutskaya V.S. [Economic security of Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union in terms of sanctions]. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1671–1682. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18334/eo.9.3.41004 EDN: ZDTCBH
Krylov A.A., Latov Yu.V. [Monitoring of national and regional economic security in modern Russia: problems, approaches, prospects]. Mikroekonomika, 2018, no. 2, pp. 107–119. (In Russ.) EDN: UOQXNI
Buzan B., Waever O. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press, 2003, 570 p.
Rodrik D. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W.W. Norton & Company, 2011, 369 p.
Tooze A. Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World. Viking, 2018, 720 p.
Afontsev S.A. [Conceptual bases of analysis of national and international economic security]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2020, no. 3, pp. 231–234. (In Russ.) EDN: OCSKAF
Drobot E.V., Vartanova M.L. [Economic security: conceptual foundations and assessment of personal security in the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2621–2648. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18334/eo.9.4.41279 EDN: CWVFKW
Vatlina L.V., Plotnikov V.A. [Digitalization and innovative development of the economy]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2023, no. 1, pp. 106–113. (In Russ.) EDN: OSBQSI
Drezner D.W. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 1999, 342 p.
Hufbauer G.C., Schott J.J., Elliott K.A., Oegg B. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. Washington, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2019, 233 p.
Esenshulova L.S., Drokovski N.B. [Threats and risks of economic security in the context of digitalization of the economy]. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika, 2023, no. 5-1, pp. 219–222. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24412/2411-0450-2023-5-1-219-222 EDN: RUPPDX
Kuzovkova T.A., Salutina T.Yu. [Risks of digital transformation of the economy and society and tools for managing the economic security of business in the digital environment]. Vek kachestva, 2024, no. 1, pp. 63–87. (In Russ.) EDN: XBZODW
Lev M.Yu., Medvedeva M.B., Leshchenko Yu.G. [BRICS economic security amidst anti-Russian sanctions: an institutional aspect]. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost', 2024, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 123–154. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.7.1.120345 EDN: EPJTVX
Bradley T., Sedgwick C. Policing Beyond the Police: A ‘First Cut’ Study of Private Security in New Zealand. Policing and Society, 2009, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. 468–492. DOI: 10.1080/10439460903375125
Ale B. Risk: An Introduction. The Concepts of Risk, Danger and Chance. Routledge, 2009, 144 p.
Mearsheimer J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 2014, 592 p.
Helleiner E. Economic Nationalism as a Challenge to Economic Liberalism? Lessons from the 19th Century. International Studies Quarterly, 2002, vol. 46, iss. 3, pp. 307–329. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2478.00235
Stiglitz J.E. Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability. World Development, 2000, vol. 28, iss. 6, pp. 1075–1086. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00006-1
Kolganov A.I., Buzgalin A.V. Global'nyi kapital. T. 1: Metodologiya: po tu storonu pozitivizma, postmodernizma i ekonomicheskogo imperializma (Marks re-loaded) [Global Capital. Vol. 1: Methodology: Beyond Positivism, Postmodernism, and Economic Imperialism (Marx re-loaded)]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2022, 656 p.
Ustinova L.N., Mukharramova E.H., Vays M.E. [Russia's economic security: nature and trends]. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2024, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 3235–3250. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18334/ce.18.11.122098 EDN: MNDAEI
Baldwin D.A. The Concept of Security. Review of International Studies, 1997, no. 23, pp. 5–26.
Shlykova E.V. [Subjective safety assessment as an indicator of adaptation to the risks of social change: methodological and empirical justification of the research approach]. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika, 2020, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 105–120. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2020.8.4.7659 EDN: HFGGTX
