+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

A comparative analysis of the anthropogenic impact and user-pays principle availability in the model areas of the Russian Federation

Vol. 18, Iss. 9, SEPTEMBER 2020

Received: 18 May 2020

Received in revised form: 17 July 2020

Accepted: 4 August 2020

Available online: 15 September 2020

Subject Heading: ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS

JEL Classification: Q51, Q53, Q57

Pages: 1787–1798

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.18.9.1787

Ayusheeva S.N. Baikal Institute of Nature Management of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (BINM SB RAS), Ulan-Ude, Republic of Buryatia, Russian Federation
asvetl@binm.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7365-3622

Subject. This article assesses the effectiveness of the existing system of environmental management based on the user-pays principle in terms of reducing the negative impact on the environment.
Objectives. The article aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the anthropogenic impact on natural environment components and deficiency payments for pollution in the model areas of the Russian Federation.
Methods. For the study, I used the methods of computational, comparative, systems, and structural analyses.
Results. Based on the ecological rating of the Russian Federation subjects, the article defines model areas, assesses the degree of anthropogenic impact on the basis of pollution relative rates, and describes the particularities of environmental investment in the selected areas.
Conclusions. The system of payments for pollution does not affect the economic behavior of economic entities.

Keywords: relative rate, environmental pollution, environmental rating, environmental investment, compensation payment

References:

  1. Bobylev S.N., Minakov V.S., Solov'eva S.V., Tret'yakov V.V. Ekologo-ekonomicheskii indeks regionov Rossii. Metodika i pokazateli dlya rascheta: monografiya [The Eco-Economic Index of Russia's Regions. Methodology and metrics for calculation: a monograph]. Moscow, World Wildlife Fund Publ., 2012, 150 p.
  2. Pearce D. Measuring Sustainable Development. London, Earthscan Publications, 1993, 224 p.
  3. Ryumina E.V. [Ecological index: construction and use in the analysis of quality of life and quality of the population]. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2018, no. 9. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Ryumina E.V. [Ecological aspects of the assessment of quality of life]. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2016, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 1113–1122. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Bityukova V. [The ecological situation in regions of Russia in 2016: the rating evaluation method]. Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii = Ecology and Industry of Russia, 2017, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4–11. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  6. Komarov V.M., Kotsyubinskii V.A. [Environmental impact assessment in Russian cities and regions]. Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Tsentra analiza i prognozirovaniya = Scientific Annual Publication of the Analysis and Forecast Centre, 2017, no. 1, pp. 45–54. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Mekush G.E., Elgina Yu.M. [The coal-mining region's economy in the context of integrating the value of ecosystem services]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2018, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 567–578. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  8. Sabanaev R.N., Nikitin O.V., Minakova E.A. et al. [Main processes initiating the development of the processes of anthropogenic eutrophication in the Kazanka River]. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel'nosti = Vestnik NTsBZhD, 2018, no. 4, pp. 125–129. URL: Link (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive