Subject. This article focuses on the problem of compensating for socioeconomic costs arising from the introduction of environmental restrictions. Objectives. The study aims to analyze existing compensation mechanisms and justify an integrated approach to their development and application to ensure social justice and long-term sustainable development. Methods. For the study, I used the methods of systematizing scientific literature on the economics of natural resource use, ecological economics, and political ecology. Results. The article identifies and characterizes key compensation instruments. It also determines the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches. Conclusions. An effective compensation policy should strategically combine different mechanisms adapted to the local context, creating positive incentives for community participation in the activities. The results of the study can be helpful for government authorities when forming and implementing environmental and socio-economic policies aimed at ensuring ecological safety and a just transition.
Sala E., Costello C., Dougherty D. et al. A general business model for marine reserves. PLOS ONE, 2013, no. 8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058799
Lin C., Gao L. Regulation intensity, freedom of production decision and the poverty of farmers: Evidence from the Panda Nature Reserves in China. Forests, 2021, no. 12. DOI: 10.3390/f12111528 EDN: YHXCUG
Bardakhanova T.B., Lubsanova N.B., Maksanova L.B.-Zh. [Rural population and national parks: Assessment of losses due to legal restrictions (A case of Tunkinsky National park, Russia)]. Mezhdunarodnyi sel'skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal, 2021, no. 2, pp. 39–43. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24412/2587-6740-2021-2-39-43 EDN: NTEKHR
Etxano I. New insights into the assessment of protected areas. Rural development – Contemporary issues and practices. London, InTech, 2012, pp. 75–98. DOI: 10.5772/1399
Woodhouse E., Bedelian C., Barnes P. et al. Rethinking entrenched narratives about protected areas and human wellbeing in the Global South. UCL Open Environment, 2022, no. 4. DOI: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000050 EDN: XGQCFC
Kronenberg J., Hubacek K. From poverty trap to ecosystem service curse. Sustainability Science, 2016, vol. 11, iss. 6, pp. 903–907. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0370 EDN: YXHJZA
Burtseva E.I., Potravnyi I.M., Gassii V.V. et al. [Issues of estimating and compensating for losses to indigenous peoples in the conditions of industrial development of the Arctic]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika, 2019, no. 1, pp. 34–49. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2019-1-34-49 EDN: WBDYPP
Nosov S.I., Bondarev B.E., Gladkov A.A. et al. Land resources evaluation for damage compensation to indigenous peoples in the Arctic (Case-study of Anabar Region in Yakutia). Resources, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 3, p. 143. DOI: 10.3390/resources8030143 EDN: YGYOVG
Gassiy V., Potravny I. The compensation for losses to indigenous peoples due to the Arctic industrial development in benefit sharing paradigm. Resources, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 2, p. 71. DOI: 10.3390/resources8020071 EDN: PUEVLB
Chester Ch.C., Lien A.M., Sundberg J. et al. Using ecosystem services to identify inequitable outcomes in migratory species conservation. Conservation Letters, 2022, vol. 15, iss. 6. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12920 EDN: ZAMLRC
Springer J. Addressing the social impacts of conservation: Lessons from experience and future directions. Conservation and Society, 2009, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 26–29. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.54794
Krueger L. Protected areas and human displacement: Improving the interface between policy and practice. Conservation and Society, 2009, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 21–25. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.54793
Kegamba J.J., Sangha K.K., Wurm P.A.S. et al. Conservation benefit-sharing mechanisms and their effectiveness in the Greater Serengeti Ecosystem: Local communities' perspectives. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2023, vol. 32, iss. 6, pp. 1901–1930. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-023-02583-1 EDN: LOQBOM
Johnson M.F., Karanth K.K., Weinthal E. Compensation as a policy for mitigating human-wildlife conflict around four protected areas in Rajasthan, India. Conservation and Society, 2018, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 305–319. DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_17_1
Poudyal M., Jones J.P.G., Rakotonarivo O.S. et al. Who bears the cost of forest conservation? PeerJ, 2018, no. 6. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5106
Muyengwa S. Determinants of individual level satisfaction with community based natural resources management: A case of five communities in Namibia. Environments, 2015, vol. 2, iss. 4, pp. 608–623. DOI: 10.3390/environments2040608
Sangkapitux Ch., Neef A., Polkongkaew W. et al. Willingness of upstream and downstream resource managers to engage in compensation schemes for environmental services. International Journal of the Commons, 2009, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 41–63. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.123
Ferraro P.J., Kiss A. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science, 2002, vol. 298, iss. 5599, pp. 1718–1719. DOI: 10.1126/science.1078104 EDN: EJIZIX
