+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Resilience factors in the Russian economy: The comparative analysis for 2000–2020

Vol. 17, Iss. 8, AUGUST 2021

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 27 May 2021

Received in revised form: 13 June 2021

Accepted: 30 June 2021

Available online: 16 August 2021

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: F52, H12, O11

Pages: 1412–1432

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.8.1412

Viktoriya V. AKBERDINA Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE UB RAS), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
akberdina.vv@uiec.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-4008

Subject. The study investigates the impact of shocks on the economic dynamics during recurring crises. Nevertheless, the impact of exogenous shocks may turn to be minor for GDP of some countries, while they cause unfavorable consequences for the economic development of others.
Objectives. I herein identify factors of resilience in the Russian economy, referring to three different crises that took place in 2000–2020, by conducting a theoretical overview of the concept Economic Resilience and resilience factors of economic systems against different shocks.
Methods. The decomposition of macroeconomic indicators is the principal method of research. The resilience of the Russian economy and other advanced economies was assessed by macroeconomic indicators related to trends in GDP and the unemployment level. I point out two groups of factors – the innate and acquired (adaptability).
Results. During the global financial crisis in 2008, the Russian economy demonstrated its innate factors, such as the availability of considerable reserves and capital mobility between the financial and industrial sectors, as well as adaptive factors as part of the national anti-crisis policy. During the period of sanctions, the resilience of the Russian economy stemmed from the enormous potential of the industrial sector and R&D, considerable reserves for production development, which underlay the import substitution policy. Finally, in the outbreak of the 2020 crisis, Russia managed to handle the crisis much better than the leading countries of the world, since there is a prevalence of State-owned large business and the domestic localization of value added chains.
Conclusions and Relevance. The study substantiated the objectivity of resilience factors of the Russian economy during multiple crises, i.e. a combination of financial, commercial, political and pandemic crises.

Keywords: resilience, resistance, economic shock, crisis

References:

  1. Yu Z., Razzaq A., Rehman A. et al. Disruption in Global Supply Chain and Socio-Economic Shocks: A lesson from COVID-19 for Sustainable Production and Consumption. Operations Management Research, 2021, no. 3. URL: Link
  2. Rose A., Liao S. Modeling Regional Economic Resilience to Disasters: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Water Service Disruptions. Journal of Regional Science, 2005, vol. 45, iss. 1, pp. 75–112. URL: Link
  3. West C., Lenze D. Modeling the Regional Impact of Natural Disaster and Recovery. International Regional Science Review, 1994, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 121–150. URL: Link
  4. Holling C. Resiliency and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 1973, vol. 4, pp. 1–24. URL: Link
  5. Lele S. Resilience, Sustainability Environmentalism. Environment and Development Economics, 1998, vol. 3, iss. 2, pp. 221–262. URL: Link
  6. Tinch R. Resilience and Resource Management Under Risk. Norwich, School of Environmental Science, 1998.
  7. Tierney K. Impacts of Recent Disasters on Businesses: The 1993 Midwest Floods and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. In: Jones B. (Ed.) Economic Consequences of Earthquakes: Preparing for the Unexpected. Buffalo, NY, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 1997.
  8. Comfort L. Shared Risk: Complex Seismic Response. New York, NY, Pergamon, 1999.
  9. Petak W. Earthquake Resilience Through Mitigation: A System Approach. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2002.
  10. Adger W.N. Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related? Progress in Human Geography, 2000, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 347–364. URL: Link
  11. Coad A. The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Employment Evidence. Papers on Economics and Evolution, 2009, #0703. URL: Link
  12. Fingleton B., Garretsen H., Martin R. Recessionary Shocks and Regional Employment: Evidence on the Resilience of UK Regions. Journal of Regional Science, 2012, vol. 52, iss. 1, pp. 109–133. URL: Link
  13. Hill E., Wial H., Wolman H. Exploring Regional Economic Resilience. Working Paper University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development (IURD), 2008, no. 4. URL: Link
  14. Lagarde C. Building a More Resilient and Inclusive Global Economy. Washington, IMF, 2017.
  15. Bristow G., Healy A. Innovation and Regional Economic Resilience: An Exploratory Analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 2017, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 1–20. URL: Link
  16. Courvisanos J., Jain A., Mardaneh K.K. Economic Resilience of Regions under Crises: A Study of the Australian Economy. Journal of Regional Studies, 2016, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 629–643. URL: Link 404.2015.1034669
  17. Davies S. Regional Resilience in the 2008–2010 Downturn: Comparative Evidence from European Countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 2011, vol. 4, iss. 3, pp. 369–382. URL: Link
  18. Martin R. Regional Economic Resilience, Hysteresis and Recessionary Shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 2012, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 1–32. URL: Link
  19. Akberdina V., Grebyonkin A., Bukhvalov Yu. [Simulation of Innovative Resonance in the Industrial Regions]. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2015, iss. 4, pp. 289–308. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive