+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






National Interests: Priorities and Security

Trends and difficulties in developing the infrastructure of special preferential areas

Vol. 17, Iss. 3, MARCH 2021

Received: 24 December 2020

Received in revised form: 10 January 2021

Accepted: 26 January 2021

Available online: 15 March 2021


JEL Classification: F15, G18, H54

Pages: 419–442


Lyudmila I. PRONYAEVA Central Russian Institute of Management, branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Orel, Russian Federation


Irina I. KRUZHKOVA Central Russian Institute of Management, branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Orel, Russian Federation


Subject. The article discusses the way the infrastructure of special preferential areas (special economic zones, socio-economic priority development areas) is being developed, and reviews respective processes.
Objectives. We evaluate the current trends and identify difficulties in implementing infrastructure projects across preferential areas.
Methods. The study relies upon general methods, such as generalization, synthesis and analysis of available scientific results concerning the economic category of infrastructure and classification of its types. We applied general methods of analysis and comparative analysis to determine the future development of the infrastructure in special preferential areas. To detect what hampers PPP infrastructure projects and describe them, we used the synthesized approach and methods of logic-intuitive and comparative analysis.
Results. We analyzed the pool of scientific results to determine the economic category of infrastructure and classify its types. We provide our own definition of the infrastructure of preferential areas and evaluate the current trends in infrastructure projects, including those in special preferential areas. Investment in the ongoing projects was found to be insufficient to meet all infrastructure development needs. Public-private partnership was proved to contribute to the infrastructure development in special preferential areas. We discovered some barriers to PPP development mechanisms in special preferential areas.
Conclusions and Relevance. Public-private partnership will contribute to the successful implementation of the above projects provided respective parties will eliminate an array of barriers. The elimination of social, political, economic, environmental and other barriers will help the areas become more competitive to secure investment resources and demonstrate better results of the socio-economic development.

Keywords: infrastructure, public-private partnership, preferential area, infrastructure project


  1. Kocherga A.I., Mazaraki A.A. Narodno-khozyaistvennyi kompleks i sotsial'nye problemy [National economic complex and social problems] Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1981, 272 p.
  2. Sergeev V.P., Soloshenko R.V., Sergeeva L.V. Razvitie proizvodstvennoi i sotsial'noi infrastruktury sel'skikh munitsipal'nykh obrazovanii: monografiya [The development of industrial and social infrastructure of municipalities: a monograph] Kursk, Kursk State Agricultural Academy Publ., 2010, 143 p.
  3. Trubitsyna T.I., Trubitsyn A.R. [Key point of modern Russian economy]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser. Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Economics, Management, Law, 2019, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 354–360. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Nizamova D.R. [Management approach to industrial infrastructure development of special economic zone (on the example of SEZ Alabuga)]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta = Actual Problems of Economics and Management, 2020, no. 1, pp. 115–127. (In Russ.)
  5. Mottaeva A.B., Akhmetkhanov I., Egorov D. [Infrastructure in Russia: Some Regional Features of Development]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2018, no. 10, pp. 535–539. (In Russ.)
  6. Tsukerman V.A., Kozlov A.A. [Directions of improving innovation infrastructure for supporting industrial activities in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka = The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, 2019, no. 2, pp. 124–134. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  7. Gilyadov T.G. [Modernization of the national economy through the development of regional production infrastructure]. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie) = MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Development), 2011, no. 3, pp. 27–30. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Polyanin A.V., Pronyaeva L.I., Podsidkova K.I. [Development of methodological aspects of estimation of efficiency of functioning of advanced development territories]. Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie = Region: Systems, Economics, Management, 2020, no. 4, pp. 17–28. (In Russ.)
  9. Musaelyan A.K. [Tax preferences for socio-economic priority development areas]. Pravovestnik = Lawyer Bulletin, 2019, no. 1, pp. 19–21. (In Russ.)
  10. Mukha D. [Transformation of investment policy instruments in various models of industrial development]. Банкаўскі веснік, 2019, no. 2, pp. 47–58. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  11. Lardo A., Mancini D., Paoloni N., Russo G. The Perspective of Capability Providers in Creating a Sustainable I4.0 Environment. Management Decision, 2020, vol. 58, iss. 8, pp. 1759–1777. URL: Link
  12. Burger-Helmchen T., Laperche B., Schiavone F., Stefani U. Financing Novelty: New Tools and Practices to Induce and Control Innovation Processes. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 197–199. URL: Link
  13. Argiolas G., Cabras S., Dessì C., Floris M. Building Innovative Models of Territorial Governance. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2009, vol. 2, iss. 3, pp. 178–210. URL: Link
  14. Tkachenko V.N. [Opportunities for the implementation of investment projects in the functioning of the territory of advanced socio-economic development (TOSED)]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2019, no. 4, pp. 566–568. (In Russ.)
  15. Pongsiri N. Regulation and Public Private Partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2002, vol. 15, iss. 6, pp. 487–495. URL: Link
  16. Jagannath H.P. Street-Level Collaboration: Perception, Power, and Politics on the Frontlines of Collaboration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2020, vol. 33, iss. 4, pp. 461–476. URL: Link
  17. Hijal-Moghrabi I., Sabharwal M., Ramanathan K. Innovation in Public Organizations: Do Government Reforms Matter? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2020, vol. 33, no. 6-7, pp. 731–749. URL: Link
  18. Abdulganiev F.S. [Territories of priority social and economic development as an institute of strategic development of single-industry towns: Based on the Republic of Tatarstan]. Regional'naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii = Regional Economy. South of Russia, 2020, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 117–124. (In Russ)
  19. Neucheva M.Yu., Shalina O.I. [Comparative analysis of the development of SEZ and TASED in Russia]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal = Economics and Management: Scientific and Practical Journal, 2020, no. 6, pp. 52–56. (In Russ)
  20. Khatskevich E.M., Tatarinova L.Yu. [Public-private partnerships in Siberia: Implementation results and barriers to development]. EKO = ECO, 2020, no. 1, pp. 29–44. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 3
March 2021