+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
Russian version 

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Analyzing the dynamics of administrative indicators in Russia

Vol. 17, Iss. 2, FEBRUARY 2021

Received: 12 October 2020

Received in revised form: 29 October 2020

Accepted: 14 November 2020

Available online: 14 February 2021

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE

JEL Classification: 45, E19, F01, O10, P10

Pages: 361384

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.2.361

Valerii V. SMIRNOV I.N. Ulianov Chuvash State University (ChuvSU), Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, Russian Federation
v2v3s4@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-3157

Subject. The article discusses the dynamics of the Russian indicators of administration.
Objectives. I identify constraints that determine administrative criteria.
Methods. The study is based on the systems approach and methods of statistical, cluster and neural network analysis.
Results. The article spotlights the stewardship of Russias economy today and theoretical considerations on general administrative criterion. I analyzed trends in the Russian administrative indicators, referring to six general aspects of management (Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank Group). Using the cluster analysis of growth rates of the Russian administrative indicators, I found major and crucial clusters. Conducting the neural network analysis, I understood the hierarchy of priorities, with the governmental efficiency being the most important one. The supremacy of law, political stability and no violence/terrorism were found to of the least significance. Having evaluated the asymmetry of trends in the Russian administrative indicators against the average, I identified the priority, that us the governmental efficiency, which turns to be a determining criterion of management.
Conclusions and Relevance. As a result of the study, I understood what hampers the dynamics of the Russian administrative indicators by determining administrative criteria. I especially point out the possibility of raising the governmental efficiency to maintain the political stability and prevent violence/terrorism by neglecting the supremacy of law, regulatory quality and simulating the anti-corruption activity. The findings contribute to the necessary scope of governmental authorities competence to make administrative decisions on the effective stewardship of Russia.

Keywords: priority hierarchy, administrative indicators, cluster, criterion, constraints, efficiency

References:

  1. Glaz'ev S.Yu. [The Russian economy at the beginning of 2020: The root causes of the growing chaos and a complex of anti-crisis measures]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal, 2020, no. 2, pp. 339. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  2. Aganbegyan A.G. [How to resume social and economic growth in Russia?]. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva = Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society, 2020, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 164182. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Aganbegyan A.G. [On the need for a new socio-economic policy]. Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk = Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 2020, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1550. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Grinberg R.S. [Economic stagnation: who is to blame and what to do?]. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva = Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society, 2020, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 114117. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Kleiner G.B. [Systemic reconstruction of the Russian socio-economic space]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival in Russia, 2020, no. 2, pp. 5969. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  6. Rodriguez M., Kinne B.J. Blue Helmets, Red Flags: Institutional, Societal, and Military Determinants of Peacekeeping Abuses. International Studies Quarterly, 2019, vol. 63, iss. 3, pp. 626640. URL: Link
  7. Zhuravleva I.V., Zhuravlev S.V. Leader in Politics and Governance: Russian Aspect. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 166, pp. 541545. URL: Link
  8. Mueller C.E. Evaluating Freedom of Information Laws: Objectives, Approaches, and Practical Considerations. International Journal of Public Administration, 2019, vol. 42, iss. 12, pp. 10201030. URL: Link
  9. Urlacher B.R. Complexity, Causality, and Control in Statistical Modeling. American Behavioral Scientist, 2020, vol. 64, iss. 1, pp. 5573. URL: Link
  10. Caetano F.A.O., Araújo J.A., Khan A.S. Fatores condicionantes do desenvolvimento socioeconômico na América Latina: uma análise sob a perspectiva do PIB e dos indicadores globais de governança. Interações (Campo Grande), 2019, vol. 20, no. 1. URL: Link
  11. Nuseirat A.A.A., Kahlout Z.M.E., Abbas A. et al. An Analysis of a Structured Benchmarking project: The Case of Dubai Electricity and Water Authoritys Benchmarking Project. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2019, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 14311450. URL: Link
  12. Khamitov M., Wang X.(S.), Thomson M. ACRoss Space and Time: How Cultural and Institutional Differences Explain Consumer-Brand Relationships Differential Effects on Brand Loyalty. AP Advances in Consumer Research, 2019, vol. 12, pp. 1112. URL: Link
  13. Mihóková L., Dráb R., Kralik A. Determinants of Short Term Fiscal Imbalance: the Role of Tax Evasion as Fiscal Determinant Within European Countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2019, vol. 67, iss. 2, pp. 515534. URL: Link
  14. Alquist R., Berman N., Mukherjee R., Tesar L.L. Financial Constraints, Institutions, and Foreign Ownership. Journal of International Economics, 2019, vol. 118, pp. 6383. URL: Link
  15. Gel'man V. Subversive Institutions, Informal Governance, and Contemporary Russian Politics. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2012, vol. 45, iss. 3-4, pp. 295303. URL: Link
  16. Baranov A., Malkov E., Polishchuk L., Rochlitz M., Syunyaev G. How (not) to Measure Russian Regional Institutions. Russian Journal of Economics, 2015, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 154181. URL: Link
  17. Kuzmina O., Volchkova N., Zueva T. Foreign Direct Investment and Governance Quality in Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2014, vol. 42, iss. 4, pp. 874891. URL: Link
  18. Skalamera M. Invisible but Not Indivisible: Russia, the European Union, and the Importance of Hidden Governance. Energy Research & Social Science, 2016, vol. 12, pp. 2749. URL: Link
  19. Hermanson A.-S. Energy Security in a Multi-Level Governance Perspective. Marine Policy, 2018, vol. 98, pp. 301308. URL: Link
  20. Tysiachniouk M., Henry L.A., Lamers M., Tatenhove J.P.M. Oil and Indigenous People in Sub-Arctic Russia: Rethinking Equity and Governance in Benefit Sharing Agreements. Energy Research & Social Science, 2018, vol. 37, pp. 140152. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 2
February 2021

Archive