+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

Institutional issues and prospects for the development of the northern regions of timber production

Vol. 16, Iss. 2, FEBRUARY 2020

Received: 26 August 2019

Received in revised form: 15 September 2019

Accepted: 5 October 2019

Available online: 14 February 2020

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE

JEL Classification: Q23, Q58, Q56

Pages: 307–325

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.16.2.307

Kozyreva G.B. Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
kozyrevakrc@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-0361

Volkov A.D. Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
kov8vol@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-8483

Subject The article investigates how institutions of sustainable development of timber lands originate, illustrating the case of the Republic of Karelia.
Objectives The study evaluates substantive aspects of the developing institution of forest certification by analyzing the business behavior and the way people of forest districts of Karelia take part in forest management.
Methods The methodological approach is based on the sustainable development concept and sustainable forest management model. We especially stress the social component, including the quality of human capital and quality of social capital. They are viewed in terms of the ability and readiness of local communities to get involved in forest management. The empirical framework relies upon the economic and sociological survey of some timber districts of the Republic of Karelia, which were conducted in 2018.
Results Ineffective formal institutions actually fail to create an environment where people could exercise their legal rights complying with sustainability principles. Forest companies fail to meet sustainability requirements. However, they still may apply for forest certificates.
Conclusions and Relevance The study reveals latent challenges arising from the forest certification institution. The principle of social compensation is often neglected. A forest certificate provides some guarantees for local people. As local people have negative views on environmental and socio-economic aspects of forest management and, furthermore, do not know about forest certificates as a means protecting their rights, forest certificates get less significant institutionally and the institutional mechanism for forest certification becomes distorted. The findings can be used to substantiate and outline relevant tools for a forest management policy.

Keywords: timber land, sustainable forest management, social sustainability, forest certification, social capital

References:

  1. Morozova T.V., Kozyreva G.B., Sukharev M.V., Belaya R.V. [Depressive areas of Russia: Institutional model of development and methodological approaches for investigation]. Internet-zhurnal Naukovedenie, 2016, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  2. Kozyreva G.B. [Institutional problems of forest areas of Russian regions]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2016, vol. 15, iss. 5, pp. 54–63. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Nikitin A.P., Chernavskaya O.D., Chernavskii D.S. [Pareto distribution in dynamical systems subject to noise perturbation]. Trudy instituta obshchei fiziki = Proceedings of the Institute of General Physics, 2009, vol. 65, pp. 107–123. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Hicks J.R. Chetyre izlishka potrebitelya. V kn.: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli [The Four Consumer's Surpluses. Milestones of Economic Thought]. St. Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 1999, pp. 190–207.
  5. Moiseev N.A. [On the development strategy of the forest sector of the Russian economy]. Lesnoe khozyaistvo = Forestry, 2008, no. 5, pp. 2–6. (In Russ.)
  6. Moiseev N.A. [Forestry in Russia. What shall we expect?]. Lesnoe khozyaistvo = Forestry, 2012, no. 6, pp. 6–11. (In Russ.)
  7. Moiseev N.A. Lesnye otnosheniya i rentnye platezhi. V kn.: Prirodnye resursy v sisteme gosudarstvennykh finansov Rossii [Forest relations and rental payments. In: Natural resources in Russia's public finance system]. Moscow, Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences Publ., 2000, pp. 94–97.
  8. Petrov A.P. [The economic framework of forest use in Russia through the lense of market relations]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa – Lesnoi vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2013, no. 4, pp. 42–44. (In Russ.)
  9. Petrov V.N., Il'in V.A., Gavrilenko V.I. Ekonomiko-pravovye otnosheniya v upravlenii lesami i lesokhozyaistvennom proizvodstve [Economic and legal relations in forest management and forestry]. St. Petersburg, Forestry Academy Publ., 2003, 200 p.
  10. Pisarenko A.I., Strakhov V.V. Lesnoe khozyaistvo Rossii: ot ispol'zovaniya k upravleniyu [Russia's forestry: From use to management]. Moscow, Yurisprudentsiya Publ., 2005, 551 p.
  11. Strakhov V.V., Pisarenko A.I., Borisov V.A. Globalizatsiya lesnogo khozyaistva [Globalization of forestry]. Moscow, VNIITsLesresurs Publ., 2001, 400 p.
  12. Shutov I.V. [To fundamentals of the forestry economics]. Lesnoe khozyaistvo = Forestry, 1996, no. 3, pp. 25–36. (In Russ.)
  13. Rannikko P. Village Development and Social Sustainability. In: Social Sustainability and the Taiga Model Forest. Joensuu, Finland, University of Joensuu, 1997, pp. 9–27.
  14. Becker G.S. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70, iss. 5, part 2, pp. 9–49. URL: Link
  15. Baranova N.M., Sorokin L.V. [An impact of human capital on the sustainable economic development]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2017, vol. 13, iss. 9, pp. 1641–1655. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Volkov A.D., Kozyreva G.B., Morozov A.A. [Human capital and social capital in the dialectics of social development]. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami, 2017, no. 10. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  17. Savina T.N. [Criteria for evaluating social responsibility of businesses: An analysis]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2016, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 107–118. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  18. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 1998, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 242–266. URL: Link
  19. Tysyachnyuk M.S. [The role of NGOs as strategic business partners in building sustainable forest management models]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii. Spetsvypusk: Internatsionalizatsiya, doverie i mnogoaktornoe upravlenie prirodnymi resursami = Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2010, no. 5, pp. 154–185. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  20. Kozyreva G.B. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie posledstviya lesnoi politiki sovremennoi Rossii: monografiya [Socio-economic consequences of the forestry policy in Russia today: a monograph]. Moscow, MONF Publ., 2007, 248 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 9
September 2020

Archive