+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Identification and assessment of risks when planning the audit sampling

Vol. 20, Iss. 2, JANUARY 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 23 May 2016

Received in revised form: 27 July 2016

Accepted: 31 August 2016

Available online: 27 January 2017

Subject Heading: AUDIT ACTIVITY

JEL Classification: М21, М42, О21

Pages: 70-87

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.20.2.70

Yakimova V.A. Amur State University, Blagoveshchensk, Amur Region, Russian Federation
vilena_yakimova@mail.ru

Radomskii V.S. OOO Riarden, Blagoveshchensk, Amur Region, Russian Federation
vitek1715@yandex.ru

Importance The article examines the technology of audit sampling, which is based on risk classification and methods of identifying risk elements at the level of groups of similar business transactions.
Objectives The purpose is to develop an algorithm of audit sampling planning, which takes into account the relationship of procedure for understanding the entity's operations, results of materiality and risk assessment with procedure for elements selection and sample scope assessment.
Methods The study rests on methods of analysis and synthesis, risk classification, selection of elements of sampling, formation of risk identification card.
Results We offer a unique algorithm to plan audit sampling. Is rests on methods of risk identification and assessment at the level of single-type transactions by reasons of risk occurrence. The designed identification cards enable to assess the impact of inherent risk, risks associated with inaccurate and non-complete processing of data in the information system, inadequate functioning of controls, and to determine the degree of the influence of consequences on the accounting data. We offer recommendations to auditors on selecting the actions in response to assessed risk elements.
Conclusions The risk-based approach to audit sampling enables to set areas of possible errors and irregularities, stratify sampled population, thus reducing the complexity of implementing the detailed audit procedures, identify significant risks, justify the sample scope and enhance the quality of audit opinion.

Keywords: audit sampling, group of transactions, risk elements, stratification, risk identification

References:

  1. ISA 330. The Auditor's Responses to Assessed Risks. 2015 Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. Volume 1. Available at: Link.
  2. Kochinev Yu.Yu. [Specific features of applying statistical and non-statistical sampling procedures in the course of the audit]. Auditor, 2014, no. 5, pp. 24–31. (In Russ.)
  3. Gazaryan A.V., Soboleva G.V. [Organization of sampling and evaluation of its results]. Bukhgalterskii uchet = Accounting, 2005, no. 13, pp. 51–56. (In Russ.)
  4. Butkova O.V., Bogachenko A.G. [Audit sampling]. Ekonomika i effektivnost' organizatsii proizvodstva = Economy and Efficiency of Organization of Production, 2010, no. 13, pp. 6–10. (In Russ.)
  5. Dobrunova M.A. [Factors influencing the method of audit sampling implementation]. Aktual'nye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk = Topical Issues of Economic Sciences, 2010, no. 12-2, pp. 17–21. (In Russ.)
  6. Eliseeva I.I., Terekhov A.A. Statisticheskie metody v audite [Statistical methods in auditing]. Мoscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1998, 176 p.
  7. Sheshukova T.G., Beresneva A.V. [Developing the methods of application of analytical procedures at the planning stage of the audit]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2014, no. 10, pp. 45–60. (In Russ.)
  8. Zolotareva V.I. [Specifics of sample design in auditing]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2001, no. 1, рр. 72–76. (In Russ.)
  9. Rychkova N.S., Yaroslavtsev S.R. [Specifics of audit sampling formation by small audit firms]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2007, no. 3, pp. 19–25. (In Russ.)
  10. Sergeeva T.V. [The audit of production costs: Selective tests]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2010, no. 9, pp. 38–46. (In Russ.)
  11. Neustroev M.Yu. [Identification and evaluation of significant risks during of the audit]. Izvestiya IGEA = Izvestiya of Irkutsk State Economics Academy, 2010, no. 6, рр. 41–44. (In Russ.)
  12. Yudintseva L.A. [Defining the objects of audit as part of the risk-based approach in the audit]. Auditor, 2014, no. 5, pp. 59–62. (In Russ.)
  13. Sungatullina R.N., Gogoleva O.L. [Identifying the risks of material misstatement of facts of economic life when assessing the internal control system]. Auditor, 2014, no. 12, pp. 38–49. (In Russ.)
  14. Yakimova V.A. [Optimization of the audit program based on the methodology for audit evidence assessment]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2013, no. 6, pp. 438–446. (In Russ.)
  15. Guzov Yu.N., Strel'nikova O.V. [Planning practice in the risk-based audit]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2015, no. 1, pp. 29–41. (In Russ.)
  16. Ekaterinoslavskii Yu.Yu., Medvedeva A.M., Shchenkova S.A. Riski biznesa. Diagnostika, profilaktika, upravlenie [Business risks. Diagnostics, prevention, control]. Мoscow, Ankil Publ., 2010, 280 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive