+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Generalization of the experience of foreign countries in the field of redistributive policy

Vol. 24, Iss. 7, JULY 2018

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 18 May 2018

Received in revised form: 1 June 2018

Accepted: 15 June 2018

Available online: 27 July 2018

Subject Heading: FISCAL SYSTEM

JEL Classification: Н24, Н53, I31

Pages: 1533–1546

https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.24.7.1533

Ermakova E.R. National Research Mordovia State University, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation
eka-tsulaya@yandex.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-9605

Importance The object of this research is redistribution policy of different countries.
Objectives The purpose of the issue is to prove the necessity of progressive income tax imposition in Russia (based on the developed countries experience).
Methods The work uses the methods of analysis, synthesis, grouping, comparing, analogues, experts' assessment comparison, system and complex approaches to studying.
Results The article studies and generalizes scientific works about socio-economic inequality. The paper reveals that there is an excessive inequality in Russia. In spite of that Russian social policy uses methods of direct financial support that make people with low income dependent on budget money. Direct support is an extra duty on budget. The countries with low level of socio-economic inequality have a progressive scale of income tax.
Conclusions and Relevance There is a necessity of changing redistribution policy in Russia, that touch launching progressive scale for income tax. The author emphasizes that it is not the only method to recover problem of excessive inequality. But in frame of redistribution policy it is the main instrument with long-term effectiveness.

Keywords: socio-economic inequality, redistribution policy, progressive income tax

References:

  1. Shevyakov A.Yu., Kiruta A.Ya. Neravenstvo, ekonomicheskii rost i demografiya: neissledovannye vzaimosvyazi [Inequality, economic growth and demography: the unexplored interrelations]. Moscow, M-Studio Publ., 2009, 192 p. URL: Link
  2. Shevyakov A.Yu. [Income inequality as a factor of economic and demographic growth]. Innovatsii = Innovations, 2011, no. 1, pp. 7–19. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Piketty T. Kapital v 21 veke [Le Capital au XXIe siècle]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2015, 592 p.
  4. Lyubimov I. [Income Inequality Revisited 60 Years Later: Piketty vs Kuznets]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2016, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 27–42. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Plyshevskii B. [Capital formation in the post-Soviet period]. Ekonomist, 2016, no. 9, pp. 22–36. (In Russ.)
  6. Ilyakova I.E., Sul'dina O.V. [Inequality as a factor of social-economic development in terms of European integration]. Konkurentosposobnost' v global'nom mire: ekonomika, nauka, tekhnologii = Competitiveness in the Global World: Economics, Science, Technology, 2017, no. 1-2, pp. 50–53. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Anikin V., Tikhonova N. [Poverty and Inequalities in BRICS: Notes on Russia]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy, 2016, no. 1, pp. 78–114. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Kormishkin E.D., Koroleva L.P., Ermoshina T.V. [Evaluation of models of financing public services in the EU]. Kontentus, 2016, no. 12, pp. 63–68. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  9. Luk'yanchikova T., Yamshchikova T. [Labor and capital: labor conflicts and social partnership]. Ekonomist, 2017, no. 5, pp. 77–88. (In Russ.)
  10. Sobolev E.N. Oplata truda v sisteme sotsial'no-trudovykh otnoshenii: stereotipy i rossiiskie real'nosti [Labor compensation in the system of social-labor relations: stereotypes and Russian realias]. Moscow, Institute of Economics RAS Publ., 2017, 50 p. URL: Link
  11. Kokhno P. [Advanced economy needs progressive scale of income taxation]. Ekonomist, 2017, no. 11, pp. 40–50. (In Russ.)
  12. Stiglitz J.E. Tsena neravenstva. Chem rassloenie obshchestva grozit nashemu budushchemu [The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2015, 512 p.
  13. Stiglitz J.E., Sen A., Fitoussi J.-P. Neverno otsenivaya nashu zhizn'. Pochemu VVP ne imeet smysla? Doklad Komissii po izmereniyu effektivnosti ekonomiki i sotsial'nogo progressa [Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publ., 2016, 216 p.
  14. Luk'yanchikova T.L., Yamshchikova T.N. [Theory and reality of social inequality]. Ekonomist, 2016, no. 11, pp. 28–35. (In Russ.)
  15. Zakharov V., Golikova E. [On dependence of the country prosperity and the taxation scale progressiveness]. Ekonomist, 2015, no. 8, pp. 23–40. (In Russ.)
  16. Zaitsev A.A. [International differences in labor productivity: Role of capital, technological level and resource rent]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2016, no. 9, pp. 67–93. (In Russ.)
  17. Kolmakov I. [Impact of the GDP structure indicators on the indicators of distribution of population income]. Ekonomist, 2018, no. 1, pp. 29–43. (In Russ.)
  18. Kormishkina L.A., Koroleva L.P. [The taxation of wealth as a factor of inclusive economic growth in the countries of the European Union and the Russian Federation]. Finansy = Finance, 2016, no. 2, pp. 23–29. (In Russ.)
  19. Savina T.N. Kriterii otsenki sotsial'no otvetstvennogo povedeniya biznesa (teoriya, metodologiya, praktika): monografiya [Evaluation criteria of socially responsible behavior of business (theory, methodology, practice): a monograph]. Saransk, National Research Mordovia State University Publ., 2017, 168 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive