Pudova D.O.Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation dpudova@nifi.ru
Importance This article discusses the issues of pension systems in the OECD countries and their pension reforms. Objectives The article aims to analyze the experience of using automatic enrolment as a pension plan mode in New Zealand, Great Britain, and Italy. Methods The information and analysis materials and legislation of OECD countries are used to implement the objective. Results The article presents the results of analysis of the retirement schemes and programs of the three countries mentioned. Conclusions and Relevance The demand for automatic enrolment has increased in recent years, but not all countries have achieved effective implementation. The conducted analysis of the experience of OECD countries is a scientific and methodological contribution to justify the possible use in Russia of the foreign practice of including people in retirement schemes.
Pudova D.O. [Funded pension systems: Evidence from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2017, no. 11, pp. 2152–2165. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Chetty R. Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 2015, no. 105(5), pp. 1–33. URL: Link
Andrietti V. Auto-enrollment, Matching and Participation in 401(k) Plans. Centre for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies Working Paper, 2015, no. 154, 29 p. URL: Link
Antolin P., Payet S., Yermo J. Coverage of Private Pension Systems: Evidence and Policy Options. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, 2012, no. 20, 36 p. URL: Link
Cribb J., Emmerson C. What Happens when Employers Are Obliged to Nudge? Automatic Enrolment and Pension Saving in the UK. Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2016, no. W16/19. URL: Link
Tumanyants K.A., Antonenko I.V., Antosik L.V. et al. [Pension Savings Investments: Government or Private Sector?]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2017, no. 1, pp. 91–102. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Beetsma R., Romp W. Participation Constraints in Pension Systems. CEPR Discussion Paper, 2013, no. 9656. URL: Link
Guardiancich I. United Kingdom. Current Pension System: First Assessment of Reform Outcome and Output. European Social Observatory, 2010. URL: Link
Chen D.H.J., Beetsma R.M.W.J. Mandatory Participation in Occupational Pension Schemes in the Netherlands and Other Countries. An Update. Netspar Discussion Paper, 2015, no. 10/2015-032. URL: Link
Rashbrooke G. Simple, Effective and (Relatively) Inexpensive: New Zealand Retirement Provision in the International Context. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 2009, iss. 36, pp. 97–110. URL: Link
O'Connell A. KiwiSaver: A Model Scheme? Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 2009, iss. 36, pp. 130–141. URL: Link
Gibson J., Hector C.J., Le T. The Distributional Impact of KiwiSaver Incentives. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, 2008, no. 2/08. URL: Link
Dobovyk T. Macroeconomic Aspects of Italian Pension Reforms of 1990s. Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies Working Paper, 2010, no. 101, 40 p. URL: Link
Rinaldi A.I. Pension Awareness and Nation-Wide Auto-Enrolment: The Italian Experience. Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies Working Paper, 2011, no. 104/11. URL: Link
Alessie R., Belloni M. Retirement Choices in Italy: What an Option Value Model Tells Us. Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies Working Paper, 2010, no. 92, 39 p. URL: Link
Fornero E., Monticone C. Financial Literacy and Pension Plan Participation in Italy. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 2011, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 547–564. URL: Link
