+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Integrated digital model of automated investment portfolio management: Economic efficiency and risks

ISSUE 7, JULY 2026

Received: 22 April 2026

Accepted: 26 May 2026

Available online: 30 July 2026

Subject Heading: COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

JEL Classification: C63, D81, G11, G17

Pages: 115-133

https://doi.org/10.24891/scsdsx

Ekaterina V. KOROLEVA Corresponding author, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
koroleva_ev@spbstu.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-5906

Aleksandr Yu. GORELIK Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
gorelik.ayu@edu.spbstu.ru

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7731-4858

Subject. A comprehensive digital model of automated investment portfolio management.
Objectives. Development of a comprehensive digital model of automated investment portfolio management and empirical verification of its effectiveness in various portfolio optimization settings.
Methods. The research is based on the provisions of the classical portfolio theory of G. Markowitz and W. Sharpe. The software implementation is implemented in Python and is organized as a modular architecture of five functional blocks (parameter setting, data loading, iterative portfolio calculation, efficiency calculation and visualization, formatting of output tables). As part of the testing, two algorithms for finding optimal weights were compared: maximizing the Sharpe coefficient and maximizing the quadratic utility, as well as an analysis of sensitivity to the parameters of the retrospective analysis window and the frequency of revision.
Results. It has been found that maximizing the Sharpe coefficient provides a higher and more stable trajectory of profitability compared to maximizing quadratic utility; maximizing quadratic utility is characterized by greater variability in the result and more pronounced fluctuations in profitability; reducing the parameters of the window of retrospective analysis and the frequency of revision worsens the final efficiency and increases the volatility of the result, with the negative effect being more pronounced for maximizing quadratic utility; accounting for transaction costs and rules for fixing/reinvesting gains significantly affects the efficiency assessment and increases the applied validity of the model.
Conclusions. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the development of a reproducible digital model with a modular structure that combines portfolio optimization and practice-oriented efficiency calculation in a single computing circuit. The practical significance lies in the possibility of using the model for scenario analysis of strategy parameters and comparing the results with a market benchmark.

Keywords: digital model, portfolio optimization, investment portfolio management, Sharpe ratio, sensitivity analysis

References:

  1. Hui Xia, Xinyu Min, Shijie Deng. Effectiveness of earnings forecasts in efficient global portfolio construction. International Journal of Forecasting, 2015, vol. 31, iss. 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.10.004
  2. Petrov D.N.1, Konnikov E.A. [Automated investment portfolio optimization algorithm in Python 3]. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 2020, no. 193, pp. 373–377. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14451/1.193.373 EDN: PUQQPF
  3. Shkanov B.A. [A comprehensive approach to portfolio optimization based on modern mathematical modeling methods]. π-Economy, 2025, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 179–201. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18721/JE.18211 EDN: ZMOFVE
  4. Yuzvovich L.I., L'vova M.I. [Asset allocation and risk assessment in the securities portfolio management system]. Finansy: teoriya i praktika, 2025, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 94–106. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-2-94-106 EDN: QKJNZX
  5. Yakonovskaya T.B. [Investment portfolio in 2024: strategies and risks]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Nauki ob obshchestve i gumanitarnye nauki, 2025, no. 1, pp. 77–82. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.46573/2409-1391-2025-1-77-82 EDN: FTTYKN
  6. Plachinda K.D. [Portfolio management of russian companies' stocks in case of changes in the key rate of the Bank of Russia]. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2025, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 322–332. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2025-3-322-332 EDN: NWFKPQ
  7. Xu Suoer, Zhang Linlin, An Yunbi. Population age structure, industry return, and portfolio strategy: Capitalizing on the trend of population aging in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2025, vol. 94, 102965. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102965
  8. Li Bo, Chen Yu. Uncertainty-driven portfolio selection via a multi-strategy modified sparrow search algorithm approach. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2025, vol. 201, part 3, 117349. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117349
  9. Wang Limin, Lin Guosen, Zhang Qijun et al. Optimal financial portfolio selection using a metaheuristic approach with multiple. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2025, vol. 99, no. 102162. DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2025.102162
  10. Cecilia Castro C., Leiva V., Basso F. A Data-Driven Systematic Review of the Metaverse in Transportation: Current Research, Computational Modeling, and Future Trends. CMES – Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 2025, vol. 144, iss. 2, pp. 1481–1543. DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2025.067992
  11. Pashaev Z.R. [Influence of market information signals on investors: adaptation and decision-making strategies]. Sotsium. Obshchestvo, 2025, no. 59, pp. 181–185. (In Russ.) EDN: HGZIXV
  12. Wang Chunbao, Li Junxuan. The impact of ESG reporting audits on investor decisions: evidence from the capital market. Finance Research Letters, 2025, vol. 86, part B, 108449. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108449
  13. Yang Yiwen, Lin Yi-Wei, Cheng Li-Chen. Impact of real-time public sentiment on herding behavior in Taiwan's stock market: Insights across investor types and industries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2025, vol. 102, 104397. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104397
  14. Liu Jie, Zhang Jingru, Chen Zhenshan. The effect of stock market manipulation on investor behavioral bias. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2025, vol. 47, 101090. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101090
  15. Zhang Hejie, Fan Hongzhong. Mainland Chinese investor attention influences on international markets: The impact of Game of Hunting on the stock returns of head-hunting companies in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2025, vol. 93, 102886. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102886
  16. Petrovskii A.D. [Development of classification of the main types of assets as hedging instruments for the company’s investment portfolio]. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki, 2024, vol. 16, no. 5. (In Russ.) EDN: UZCVYB
  17. Mel'nikov R.M. [The impact of financial literacy on the choice of financial instruments by private investors in Russian conditions]. Finansy: teoriya i praktika, 2024, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 239–248. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-5-239-248 EDN: SGVQRT
  18. Vlasov D.A., Sinchukov A.V. [Features of designing a portfolio of financial instruments based on the evaluation of beta-coefficients]. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika, 2024, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 28-35. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/2587-9111-2024-12-1-28-35 EDN: DBOHHZ
  19. Oben R.J., Seraj M., Eyüpoğlu Ş.Z. Volatility and return spillovers among US traditional technology stocks, decentralized finance instruments and conventional cryptocurrencies: implications for portfolio optimization. Review of Behavioral Finance, 2025, vol. 17, iss. 5, pp. 807–834. DOI: 10.1108/RBF-12-2024-0377
  20. Newaz M.K., Aslam A. Geopolitical risks and ESG bonds: Portfolio implications for sustainable investing. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, vol. 395, 127750. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127750
  21. Yakupov B.T., Safiullin L.N. [New approach to risk assessment of securities portfolios]. Kazanskii ekonomicheskii vestnik, 2023, no. 2, pp. 71–82. (In Russ.) EDN: NVFXEI
  22. Markowitz H. Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 1952, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–91. DOI: 10.2307/2975974
  23. Georgalos K., Paya I. On the contribution of the Markowitz model of utility to explain risky choice in experimental research. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2021, vol. 182, pp. 527–543. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.010
  24. Ortiz R., Contreras M., Mellado C. Optimal shrinkage of means in the Markowitz model. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025, vol. 104, part A, 104136. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104136
  25. Ye1 Jiang, Wang Yiwei, Raza M.W. The Sharpe Ratio’s Upper Bound of the Portfolios in the Presence of a Benchmark: Application to the US Financial Market. Journal of Mathematical Finance, vol. 12, pp. 566–581. DOI: 10.4236/jmf.2022.123030
  26. Chen Yuting, Potì V. Econometric identification of the attainable maximal sharpe ratio by optimal shrinkage of the cross-section of asset returns. Economics Letters, vol. 235, 111531. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111531
  27. Guk K.O., Myl'tsina O.A. [Finding the optimal portfolio of securities in a set of assets]. Trudy MFTI. Trudy Moskovskogo fiziko-tekhnicheskogo instituta (natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo universiteta), 2022, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 16–20. (In Russ.) EDN: BOBIOF
  28. Dobrina M.V., Chernov V.P. [Optimization and forecasting of a securities portfolio based on machine learning methods]. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoi praktiki, 2024, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 258-267. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2024-20-4-258-267 EDN: RRLBIK

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

ISSUE 7
JULY 2026

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!