+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Market expectations and global political factors: New challenges for oil demand forecasting

ISSUE 10, OCTOBER 2025

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 16 July 2025

Accepted: 19 August 2025

Available online: 15 October 2025

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: F17, F47

Pages: 33-45

https://doi.org/10.24891/omhysn

Roman V. GUBAREV Corresponding author, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation
gubarev.rv@rea.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1634-5030

Aleksandr V. MATYTSYN ZGME Trading FZE, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
avmatytsyn@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-1347

Adil M. DZHABRAILOV Bank of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation
adil.dzhabrailov45@bk.ru

ORCID id: not available

Mark K. LAPIDUS Business Solutions and Technologies Group, Moscow, Russian Federation
mark.lapidus@mail.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject. The article considers the influence of geopolitical factors on the formation of market expectations regarding global oil demand.
Objectives. The study aims at quantitative verification of hypotheses about the influence of political factors, in particular, geopolitical instability, on the formation of market expectations regarding oil demand.
Methods. The research rests on general scientific and special economic and mathematical methods.
Results. We built a linear regression model that includes the geopolitical risk index (GPR), inflation rate, gross domestic product, and Brent and WTI oil prices. To identify possible structural changes, the model was evaluated separately on two time subsamples: before and after 2010. The sliding regression method helped estimate time variability of coefficient for GPR and record the increased influence of political factors on market expectations. We developed a predictive error model, in which absolute deviations from the baseline forecast are explained by the level of geopolitical instability. This enabled to quantify the impact of political shocks on reducing the accuracy of predictions. The ARCH LM test at the final stage of the analysis confirmed the presence of heteroscedasticity in the remnants of the model during periods of increasing geopolitical risks. The results show that political factors, even in the absence of direct dependence on the level of consumption, systematically worsen the accuracy of forecasts.
Conclusions. Geopolitical factor is a new challenge for traditional forecasting, requiring the adaptation of models, taking into account uncertainty and possible application of new methodological approaches, including scenario analysis, neural network models, or stress testing.

Keywords: geopolitical risks, oil market, market expectations, predictive vulnerability, rolling regression

References:

  1. Cunado J., Gupta R., Lau C.K.M., Xin Sheng. Time-Varying Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Oil Prices. Defence and Peace Economics, 2019, vol. 31, iss. 6, pp. 692–706. DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2018.1563854
  2. Cai Yang, Zibo Niu, Wang Gao. The time-varying effects of trade policy uncertainty and geopolitical risks shocks on the commodity market prices: Evidence from the TVP-VAR-SV approach. Resources Policy, 2022, vol. 76, no. 102600. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102600
  3. Thai-Ha Le, Boubaker S., Manh Tien Bui, Park D. On the volatility of WTI crude oil prices: A time-varying approach with stochastic volatility. Energy Economics, 2022, vol. 117, no. 106474. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106474
  4. Smales L.A. Geopolitical Risk and Volatility Spillovers in Oil and Stock Markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2021, vol. 80, pp. 358–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2021.03.008
  5. Jinfei Sheng, Zheng Sun, Qiguang Wang. Geopolitical Risk Factors and Stock Returns. 2025, 67 p. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5207012
  6. Zhu Qianqian, Guodong Li, Zhijie Xiao. Quantile Estimation of Regression Models with GARCH-X Errors. Statistica Sinica, 2019, October. DOI: 10.5705/ss.202019.0003
  7. Lihua Qian, Qing Zeng, Tao Li. Geopolitical risk and oil price volatility: Evidence from Markov-switching model. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2022, vol. 81, pp. 29–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.002
  8. Husain S., Sohag K., Yanrui Wu. Geopolitical Risks, Oil Market Instability and Renewable Energy Production. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3980443
  9. Fen Li, Cunyi Yang, Zhenghui Li, Failler P. Does Geopolitics Have an Impact on Energy Trade? Empirical Research on Emerging Countries. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, iss. 9. DOI: 10.3390/su13095199
  10. Zhikai Zhang, Mengxi He, Yaojie Zhang, Yudong Wang. Geopolitical risk trends and crude oil price predictability. Energy, 2022, vol. 258. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124824
  11. Daxuan Cheng, Yin Liao, Zheyao Pan. The Geopolitical Risk Premium in the Commodity Futures Market. Journal of Futures Markets, 2023, vol. 43, iss. 8, pp. 1069–1090. DOI: 10.1002/fut.22398
  12. Yıldırım H. ARCH-GARCH model on volatility of crude oil. International Journal of Disciplines in Economics and Administrative Sciences Studies, 2017, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 17–22. DOI: 10.26728/ideas.11
  13. Mishin A.A., Vakulenko O.S. [The GARCH model to analyze the volatility of oil and gas sector stocks]. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii, 2025, no. 2, pp. 133–157. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2025-252-2-133-157 EDN: HQHDOM

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

ISSUE 10
OCTOBER 2025

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!