Subject. The article addresses the stability of the Russian financial system. Objectives. The purpose is to determine the limit of stability of the Russian financial system. Methods. The study draws on methods of data analysis and synthesis, correlation and regression analysis. Results. The Russian economy has a substantial stake of non-financial sector requiring investments. Shares of non-financial organizations are risky but potentially more profitable investments. Under high economic uncertainty, investors look for low-risk assets. Pension funds and insurance companies are changing the structure of their portfolios in favor of federal loan bonds. This enables the government to increase the volume of long-term bond issuance to finance budget deficits. Variable interest rates provide for an opportunity to insure against possible losses caused by interest rate changes. There is an increase in excess of household debt over the volume of federal loan bond market. Non?financial organizations are attracting borrowed funds, outpacing the growth rate of household lending and federal bonds issuance. Non-financial sector debts are growing faster than household debts, while overall financial stability is maintained by the Bank of Russia through the key interest rate. Conclusions. The revealed limit of stability of the Russian financial system will be useful for business analysts when forecasting changes in the economy.
Keywords: stock, household, non-financial organization, bond, financial system
References:
Dubinin S.K. [Russia's financial system under sanctions: Logic of confrontation]. Rossiya v global'noi politike = Russia in Global Affairs, 2022, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 168–187. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-5-168-187 EDN: WJZSCZ
Jie Hu, JianMing Chen, Shah Zaib. Financial resource curse and firms' accessibility to financing in resource-based countries. Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10, iss. 17, e36644. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36644
Huiai Yuan, Lihong Zhao, Muhammad Umair. Crude oil security in a turbulent world: China's geopolitical dilemmas and opportunities. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2023, vol. 16, no. 101334. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101334
Mohsin M., Dilanchiev A., Umair M. The Impact of Green Climate Fund Portfolio Structure on Green Finance: Empirical Evidence from EU Countries. Ekonomika, 2023, vol. 102, iss. 2, pp. 130‒144. DOI: 10.15388/Ekon.2023.102.2.7
Sinha A., Gupta M., Shahbaz M., Sengupta T. Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: Implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 232, pp. 1379‒1393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.066
Yang Zhang, Campana P.E., Lundblad A., Jinyue Yan. Comparative study of hydrogen storage and battery storage in grid connected photovoltaic system: Storage sizing and rule-based operation. Applied Energy, 2017, vol. 201, pp. 397‒411. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.123
Qihan Wu, Dong Yan, Muhammad Umair. Assessing the role of competitive intelligence and practices of dynamic capabilities in business accommodation of SMEs. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2023, vol. 77, pp. 1103‒1114. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.024
Liping Wang, Zhijia Wang, Lili Tian, Chuang Li. Evolutionary Game and Numerical Simulation of Enterprises Green Technology Innovation: Based on the Credit Sales Financing Service of Supply Chain. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, iss. 1. DOI: 10.3390/su15010702
Yizhong Wang, Carl R. Chen, Ying Sophie Huang. Economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2014, vol. 26, pp. 227‒243. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.12.008
Abdoh H., Varela O. Product market competition, idiosyncratic and systematic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2017, vol. 43, pp. 500‒513. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.02.009
Amighini A., Giudici P., J. Ruet J. Green finance: An empirical analysis of the Green Climate Fund portfolio structure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, vol. 350, 131383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131383
Jun Xie, Yifan Zhang. Anti-corruption, government intervention, and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China. Economic Systems, 2020, vol. 44, iss. 1, no. 100745. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100745
Haddad H.B., Mezghani I., M.A. Dohaiman M.A. Common shocks, common transmission mechanisms and time-varying connectedness among Dow Jones Islamic stock market indices and global risk factors. Economic Systems, 2020, vol. 44, iss. 2, no. 100760. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100760
Nowzohour L., Stracca L. More than a feeling: Confidence, uncertainty, and macroeconomic fluctuations. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2020, vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 691‒726. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12354
Ahmed W.M.A. Stock market reactions to domestic sentiment: Panel CS-ARDL evidence. Research in International Business and Finance, 2020, vol. 54, no. 101240. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101240
Toguç N., Kuşkaya S., Magazzino C., Bilgili F. The impact of natural disaster shocks on business confidence level and Istanbul Stock Exchange: A wavelet coherence approach. Geological Journal, 2023, vol. 58, iss. 12, pp. 4610‒4624. DOI: 10.1002/gj.4868
Shabir M., Ping Jiang, Shahab Y. et al. Diversification and bank stability: Role of political instability and climate risk. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, vol. 89, part B, pp. 63‒92. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.009
Jeungbo Shim. Loan portfolio diversification, market structure and bank stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2019, vol. 104, pp. 103‒115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.04.006
Calice P., Leonida L., Muzzupappa E. Concentration-stability vs concentration-fragility. New cross-country evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2021, vol. 74, no. 101411. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101411
