+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Birch Index as an indicator of business competitiveness in the regional market segment of processing industry: a case of the market of juices in the Krasnodar Krai

Vol. 13, Iss. 45, DECEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 27 May 2015

Accepted: 9 June 2015

Available online: 10 December 2015

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONS

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 27-37

Glukhikh L.V. Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
GluhihL@bk.ru

Rodin D.Ya. Kuban State Agrarian University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
rodin17@mail.ru

Komisarova E.M. Kuban State Agrarian University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
GluhihL@bk.ru

Subject The article deals with the issues of development of small and medium-sized enterprises at the present stage of economic development of society in a competitive market environment.
     Objectives The aim of the study is to develop mechanisms for the development of entrepreneurial activity of companies, drivers of economic growth, using their competitive advantages. The study’s objectives are as follows: to define the theoretical aspects of the impact of market forces on the formation of companies’ business; to reveal and adapt foreign approaches to the formation of new methods of assessing the levels of economic growth of regional companies; to form a mechanism for creation and promotion of high-quality innovative products at the regional consumer markets; to identify competitive advantages and strategic initiatives of companies-driver in the regional market of juice industry.
     Methods The methodological basis of the study is based on the analysis and synthesis of scientific knowledge in the investigated field. The work uses techniques of systems analysis, market research, and research of system interconnections, induction and deduction, as well as a monographic method.
     Results We identified the positive role of market forces in the formation and realization of competitive advantages in developing and implementing the final product innovation, which has both consumer and added values. We show that the share of rapidly growing firms, termed "gazelles", in sectors of the economy is small, and most small businesses develop slowly. We prove that the use of the Birch Index in micro-and macroeconomics helps identify the most problematic and vulnerable points of the modern Russian enterprise system. We identify certain "gazelles" among the local juice-producing companies that have strong positive impulses for growth of the Russian economy.
     Conclusions Implementation of the proposed approaches and mechanisms of development of entrepreneurship of small and medium-sized enterprises is aimed at the realization of their competitive advantages. At the present stage of modernization and import substitution policy, the vector is shifting in the direction of development and further improvement of the public-private partnership mechanism.

Keywords: gazelles of business, small and medium-sized business, innovation, entrepreneurship, operating model agent, Birch Index

References:

  1. Birch D.L. The Job Generation Process. Cambridge, MA, MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change, 1979, 52 p.
  2. Neumark D., Wall B., Zhang J. Do Small Businesses Create More Jobs? New Evidence from the National Establishment Time Series. NBER Working Paper, 2008, February, no. 13818.
  3. Birch D., Medoff J. Gazelles. In: Labor Markets, Employment Policy, and Job Creation. Solomon L.C., Levenson A.R. (Eds). Westview, Boulder Co., 1994, pp. 159–168.
  4. Taranukha Yu.V. Strategii povedeniya v sovremennoi konkurentsii [Behavior strategies in the modern competition]. Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom = Marketing in Russia and Abroad, 2014, no. 2, pp. 68–84.
  5. Moore J.F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. N.Y., Harper Business, 1996.
  6. Polunin Yu.A., Yudanov A.Yu. Khrupkaya sila srednego biznesa [The fragile power of medium-sized businesses]. Ekspert = Expert, 2013, no. 20, pp. 38–48.
  7. Yudanov A.Yu. Nositeli predprinimatel'stva: firmy-gazeli v Rossii [Bearers of entrepreneurship: Gazelle firms in Russia]. Zhurnal novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2010, no. 5, pp. 91–108.
  8. Porter M.E. Konkurentnoe preimushchestvo. Kak dostich' vysokogo rezul'tata i obespechit' ego ustoichivost' [Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance]. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2005, 715 p.
  9. Rybakov F.F. Perspektivy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sankt-Peterburga [Prospects for socio-economic development of St. Petersburg]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia, 2008, no. 1, pp. 56–61.
  10. Thomson A.A.Jr., Strickland A.J. Strategic Management: Concept and Cases. 3rd edition. Plano, Tex, Business Publications, 1984, 1034 p.
  11. Polunin Yu.A. Srednii biznes i konservativnye ekonomicheskie otnosheniya [Medium-sized business and conservative economic relations]. Ekspert = Expert, 2014, no. 26, pp. 1–4.
  12. Porter M.E. Konkurentnaya strategiya. Metodika analiza otraslei i konkurentov [Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors]. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2005, 454 p.
  13. Dumachev V.N., Rodin V.A. Evolyutsiya antagonisticheski-vzaimodeistvuyushchikh populyatsii na baze dvumernoi modeli Ferkhyul'sta-Pirla [Evolution of antagonistic-interacting populations based on the two-dimensional Verhulst-Pearl model]. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie = Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 2005, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 11–22.
  14. Yudanov A., Dumnaya N.N. et al. Genii natsional'nogo biznesa [The National business geniuses]. Ekspert = Expert, 2007, no. 16, pp. 4–6.
  15. Tanaka Kh. Uvelichenie konkurentosposobnosti natsional'noi promyshlennosti putem ispol'zovaniya otkrytykh innovatsii i upravleniya metaprogrammami [Increasing the competitiveness of the national industries through the use of open innovation and corresponding meta-program management]. Upravlenie proektami i programmami = Program and Project Management, 2011, no. 3, pp. 45–58.
  16. Tanaka Kh. Stsenarii upravleniya v mnogoukladnoi kul'ture UP: opyt Yaponii [Management scenarios in the mixed culture of PM: Japan's experience]. Upravlenie proektami i programmami = Program and Project Management, 2010, no. 4, pp. 39–52.
  17. Hamel G., Prahalad C.K. Konkuriruya za budushchee. Sozdanie rynkov zavtrashnego dnya [Competing for the Future]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes Publ., 2002, 288 p.
  18. Lapshina S.N., Kravtsevich K.V., Berg D.B. Dinamika rosta ekonomicheskikh “gazelei” [The dynamics of economic growth of gazelles]. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Izvestia of USUE, 2011, no. 2, pp. 53–61.
  19. Vin'kov A.E. Sozdateli budushchego – gazeli s mozgom obez'yany [The makers of the future: gazelles with monkey brains]. Ekspert = Expert, 2011, no. 10, pp. 1–7.
  20. Kirillovskaya A.A. Industrial Policy on the Threshold of the 21st Century: Necessity and Comparative Aspect. Athens, ATINER'S Conference Paper Series, 2012, no. ECO2012-0323.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive