Il'ina I.N.Institute of Regional Studies and Urban Planning, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation iilina@hse.ru
Kirillova A.N.Institute of Regional Studies and Urban Planning, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation kirillova_an@mail.ru
Plisetskii E.E.Institute of Regional Studies and Urban Planning, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation epliseckij@hse.ru
Kopychenko G.S.Institute of Regional Studies and Urban Planning, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation gkopychenko@hse.ru
Rybina E.G.Institute of Regional Studies and Urban Planning, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Obninsk, Kaluga Region, Russian Federation ribina_evgenia@mail.ru
Subject The article deals with the problems and peculiarities of formation of regional target programs at the present time. The subject of the research is the program-target planning system in the regions of the Russian Federation. Objectives The purpose of the article is a review of the evaluation of the effectiveness of program planning in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation using the experience of the Tyumen region. Results The authors have analyzed the impact of the changes made in the budget code of the Russian Federation concerning the mandatory transition of regions to State programs on the regional program and budget process. The authors found that the formation of new-type programs (State and municipal) requires serious changes in regions target planning and improving the quality of regional programming. The authors developed a technique to evaluate the effectiveness of programs at all stages of the product life cycle, from creation to implementation monitoring. The authors applied the methodology to assess the effectiveness of long-term target programs of the Tyumen region for 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 timeframe. Conclusions and Relevance The analysis of the programs and the results of the assessment confirmed the need to establish new mechanisms of the system program management. These mechanisms should include strengthening of goal-setting and an integrated approach to programs and activities, taking into account the targets, resources, timelines and performers. Also, updating and making adjustments in program documents are necessary as deviations from the projected targets arise. In addition, the mechanisms should contain criteria of increase of program manageability and regular assessment of the effectiveness and contribution to the development of the economy. And finally, new mechanisms for program management should strengthen the responsibility of officials for ineffective programs.
Batievskaya V.B. Prioritetnye proekty i programmno-tselevoi podkhod [Priority projects and a program-target approach]. EKO – ECO, 2007, no. 9, pp. 42–55.
Goldakov R.N., Petrov M.N. Tselevye kompleksnye programmy: monografiya [Target comprehensive programs: a monograph]. Moscow, Kreativnaya ekonomika Publ., 2010, 128 p.
Maiskaya E.S. Problemy realizatsii tselevykh programm v usloviyakh vnedreniya byudzhetirovaniya, orientirovannogo na rezul'tat [Problems of implementation of target programs in the conditions of introduction of the result-focused budgeting]. Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya – Modern economics: problems and solutions, 2012, no. 8, pp. 107–119.
Raizberg B.A. Programmno-tselevoe planirovanie i upravlenie [Program-targeted planning and management]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2002, 428 p.
Smolyar M.Ya. Programmnyi byudzhet: na puti k effektivnomu finansovomu menedzhmentu [A program budget: on the way to effective financial management]. Finansy – Finance, 2010, no. 11, pp. 71–72.
Stolyarov O.I., Polishchuk K.V. Sovershenstvovanie ispol'zovaniya programmno-tselevogo metoda dlya resheniya problem razvitiya regionov [Improvement of the use of a program-target method to solve problems of the development of regions]. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossiiskoi akademii nauk – Proceedings of ISA RAS, 2008, no. 34, pp. 215–234.
Sankovets N.A. O zarubezhnom opyte gosudarstvennogo upravleniya regional'nym razvitiem [The foreign experience of public administration of regional development]. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal – Economic journal, 2009, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 42–49.
Teplitskaya A.A. Obzor i analiz zarubezhnogo opyta planirovaniya [A review and analysis of the foreign experience of planning]. Molodoi uchenyi – Young scientist, 2013, no. 1, pp. 188–192.
Shakirova G.R., Maksimets N.V. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy programmno-tselevogo upravleniya [Theoretical and methodical bases of a program-targeted management]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo – Russian journal of entrepreneurship, 2012, no. 21, pp. 32–36.
Allison M., Kaye J. Strategic Planning for Nonprofit Organizations: A Practical Guide and Workbook. Wiley, 2005, p. 480.
Aristovnik A., Seljak J. Performance budgeting: selected international experiences and some lessons for Slovenia. Journal of Economics, 2010, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 271–291.
Jong М., Beek I., Posthumus R. Introducing accountable budgeting: lessons from a decade of performance-based budgeting in the Netherlands. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2013, vol. 12, iss. 3, no. 11, pp. 1–34. doi: 10.1787/budget-12-5k455r12vs37
Kraan D.-J. Programme Budgeting in OECD Countries. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2007, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–41.
Lee R.D., Johnson R.W., Joyce Ph.G. Public Budgeting Systems. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2008, 758 p.
McKinney J.B. Effective Financial Management in Public and Nonprofit Agencies. Praeger Publishers, 2004, 608 p.
Mullen P.R. Performance-Based Budgeting: The Contribution of the Program Assessment Rating Tool. Public Budgeting & Finance, 2006, pp. 79–88.
Netting E.F., O'Connor M.K., Fauri D.P. Comparative Approaches to Program Planning. New Jersey, 2008, 320 p.
Rubin I.S. The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing.CQ Press, 2013, 352 p.
Schick A. Sustainable Budget Policy: Concepts and Approaches. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107–126.
Weitzman B., Silver D., Brazill C. Efforts to Improve Public Policy and Programs through Data Practice: Experiences in 15 Distressed American Cities. Public Administration Review, 2006, May–June, pp. 386–399.