+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Methods of evaluating the effectiveness of public support for innovation activity in the regions

Vol. 12, Iss. 32, AUGUST 2014

Available online: 19 August 2014

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 49-56

Napalkov A.A. Syktyvkar State University, Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, Russian Federation
umbra.89@mail.ru

Subject The theme of this work is the method of assessing the impact of Government support for innovation activity in the regions. The subject is the evaluation of the impact of Government support for innovation activity in the regions.
     Objective The purpose of this work is to define a method for assessing the impact of Government support for innovation activity in the regions.
     Methods In the course of the research, I used graphic and tabular ways to present information, as well as other research methods, such as generalization, synthesis, comparison, and grouping. The work compares the impact of Government support for innovation activity in the Republic of Komi and Moscow.
     Results In the Komi Republic case, I have analyzed the cost-effectiveness of subsidies to support the innovation sphere, as well as the share of "survival" of innovation projects after receiving the grant. In addition, I have formed a success rate of public support for innovation, based on economic, social and strategic indicators of a project. Use of this factor on the example of the Komi Republic has allowed determining the extent of the impact of two types of State support. Also, I make certain proposals for improving the evaluation system of innovation project of the subject of innovation that claims to receive State subsidies. These proposals include the formation of the requirement for the provision of information on subjects' current economic results and the inclusion in the evaluation system the lifetime project of the enterprise, claiming support.
     Relevance The results of the study allow formulating possible directions of the development of innovation policy in the region. They are useful for both the Federal and regional State authorities.

Keywords: State support, innovation, method, assessment, efficiency, index

References:

  1. Buev V.V., Migin S.V., Smirnov N.V., Shamrai A.A., Shestoperov A.M. Integral'nye pokazateli razvitiya malogo predprinimatel'stva [Integrated indicators of the development of small business]. Moscow, Vektra Publ., 2007, 25 p.
  2. Dadashev A., Glovatskaya N., Lazurenko S., Neshitoi A. Effektivnost' podderzhki malogo predprinimatel'stva [The efficiency of support of small business]. Voprosy Economiki, 2002, no. 7, pp. 127–139.
  3. Eroshin M. Sushchnost' i struktura gosudarstvennoi politiki po podderzhke malogo i srednego biznesa [The essence and structure of the government policy to support small and medium-sized business]. Konsul'tant direktora – Consultant of director, 2004, no. 11, pp. 22–31.
  4. Karlusov V., Kalashnikov D. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka predprinimatel'stva v usloviyakh vstupleniya Kitaya v VTO [The State support of business in the conditions of China’s accession to the WTO]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya – Problems of theory and practice of management, 2004, no. 3, pp. 24–30.
  5. Kulik H.A., Onishchenko L.G. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka malogo biznesa v Rossii [Government support of small business in Russia]. Sibirskii torgovo-ekonomicheskii zhurnal – Siberian trade and economic journal, 2010, no. 11, pp. 28–36.
  6. Lymar' E.N. Effektivnost' gosudarstvennoi podderzhki malogo i srednego biznesa kak uchastnikov rynkov s monopolisticheskoi konkurentsiei [The efficiency of State support of small and medium-sized businesses as participants of the markets with monopolistic competition]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2012, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 95–101.
  7. Milovanov A.N. Povyshenie effektivnosti gosudarstvennoi podderzhki agrarnogo sektora ekonomiki [Increase of the efficiency of public support of the agrarian sector of economy]. Voprosy sovremennoi nauki i praktiki – Problems of contemporary science and practice, 2012, no. 35, pp. 191–198.
  8. Neshitoi A.C. Kontseptual'no-metodicheskie osnovy kompleksnoi otsenki effektivnosti regional'noi sistemy podderzhki i razvitiya malogo predprinimatel'stva v g. Moskve [The conceptual and methodological bases of a complex assessment of the efficiency of a regional system of support and development of small business in Moscow]. Finansovyi menedzhment – Financial management, 2002, no. 5, pp. 109–120.
  9. Rupov A. Politika podderzhki [The policy of support]. Ekonomika Rossii: XXI vek – Economy of Russia: 21st century, 2003, no. 12, p. 45.
  10. Yusupov N. Podderzhka malogo predprinimatel'stva v SShA [Support of small business in the USA]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya – World economy and international relations, 2001, no. 5, pp. 87–89.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive