+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

An influence of import substitution policies on ensuring the national economic sovereignty

Vol. 12, Iss. 6, JUNE 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 23 December 2015

Received in revised form: 19 February 2016

Accepted: 30 March 2016

Available online: 28 June 2016

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC SECURITY

JEL Classification: D02, E22, F02, F51, G28

Pages: 86-96

Filippova I.A. Ulyanovsk State Technical University, Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation
fia282@mail.com

Krasil'nikova E.E. Ulyanovsk State Technical University, Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation
studentulstu@mail.ru

Importance Whereas Russia faces the Western economic sanctions, import substitution policies and their effective implementation gain special relevance and significance. As its domestic policy priority, Russia should undertake a combination of measures to provide the domestic market with products, which would be identical to imported ones, and equal in terms of prices and quality.
Objectives The research comprehensively examines mechanisms for implementing import substitution policies as a response to the EU and U.S. sanctions. We also identify what mechanisms Russia uses to implement the import substitution policies, priority sectors, and analyze positive and negative effects of the import substitution policies for Russia.
Methods The research represents a comparative analysis of export and import in Russia for the period from 2012 through 2015.
Results Import substitution constitutes a complicated system, a set of measures to create favorable conditions for domestic production and its development in Russia. Scientific and productive capabilities of domestic manufacturers will not advance without the State aid. We presented measures the State undertakes to create the favorable environment for domestic production.
Conclusions and Relevance Import substitution is a long, complicated and contradictory process. Import substitution may prove unreasonable for reasons, other than financial sovereignty that is regarded as a priority for any nation. To provide the market and consumers with products, that would be comparable with imported ones, the country should create appropriate conditions for effective operation and development of human, investment, scientific and productive capabilities.

Keywords: food security, investment, import substitution, science sector, production, human capital

References:

  1. Martynov K. [Issues of evaluating Russia's food security]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2014, no. 14, pp. 94–97. (In Russ.)
  2. Kurochkina A., Lugovskoi R., Zin'kovskaya V. [Attention to exogenous and endogenous factors to articulate governmental policies for Russia's food security]. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management, 2015, no. 1, pp. 30–37. (In Russ.)
  3. Mottaeva A. [Analyzing the economic implications of sanctions for the Russian regions]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2015, no. 6-3, pp. 200–203. (In Russ.)
  4. Epshtein D. [Embargo, agricultural policy and changing paradigms of public administration]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia, 2014, no. 4, pp. 45–52. (In Russ.)
  5. Knobel' A. [The Eurasian Economic Union: prospects and challenges for development]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2015, no. 3, pp. 87–108. (In Russ.)
  6. Osipov V. [Internal threats of Russia's economic security]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2015, no. 5-2, pp. 176–179. (In Russ.)
  7. Golubev A. [AIC development through national innovations as an import substitution requirement]. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaistvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatii = Economy of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises, 2015, no. 2, pp. 42–47. (In Russ.)
  8. Shakirov S. [Specifics of the governmental mechanism for regulating the AIC development at the current stage]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2014, no. 11-4, pp. 38–43. (In Russ.)
  9. Miloserdov V. [Sanctions, food embargo, import substitution]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaistva Rossii = Economy of Russia's Agriculture, 2014, no. 11, pp. 13–20. (In Russ.)
  10. Novitskii N. [Import substitution as a platform for technological breakthrough to innovative reproduction]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2014, no. 10, pp. 86–90. (In Russ.)
  11. Yastrib A. [Let us ensure import substitution]. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika = International Economy, 2014, no. 12, pp. 70–71. (In Russ.)
  12. Slepak K. [The effect of anti-crisis planning on the innovative development of the Russia regions' economy in terms of national security]. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management, 2015, no. 2, pp. 47–53. (In Russ.)
  13. Andreev O. [Import substitution as an important component of structural transformation in national economy]. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava = Economic and Law Issues, 2011, no. 39, pp. 71–75. (In Russ.)
  14. Vashanov V., Maslova V. [Russia's AIC development amid foreign economic risks]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaistva Rossii = Economy of Russia's Agriculture, 2014, no. 11, pp. 20–25. (In Russ.)
  15. Barbanova S. [Development of the Russian economy during export and raw material restrictions]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2015, no. 3, pp. 59–63. (In Russ.)
  16. Klimenko A. [Import substitution as part of preserving the food security]. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic Sciences, 2008, no. 47, pp. 186–189. (In Russ.)
  17. Volkodavova E., Nazarchuk E. [Import substitution as a room for increasing the industrial enterprise's performance and a source of sustainable development in economic sectors]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics, 2007, no. 5, pp. 49–51. (In Russ.)
  18. Dana J. Market-Based Approaches for Governments of Food-Importing Countries to Manage Food Security Risks. Global Food Security, 2013, vol. 2, iss. 3, pp. 182–187.
  19. Carletto C., Zezza A., Banerjee R. Towards Better Measurement of Household Food Security: Harmonizing Indicators and the Role of Household Surveys. Global Food Security, 2013, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 30–40.
  20. Poulsen M., McNab P., Clayton M., Neff R. A Systematic Review of Urban Agriculture and Food Security Impacts in Low-Income Countries. Food Policy, 2015, vol. 55, pp. 131–146.
  21. Warren E., Hawkesworth S., Knai C. Investigating the Association Between Urban Agriculture and Food Security, Dietary Diversity, and Nutritional Status: A Systematic Literature Review. Food Policy, 2015, vol. 53, pp. 54–66.
  22. Dimitri C., Oberholtzer L., Zive M., Sandolo C. Enhancing Food Security of Low-Income Consumers: An Investigation of Financial Incentives for Use at Farmers Markets. Food Policy, 2015, vol. 52, pp. 64–70.
  23. Mock N., Morrow N., Papendieck А. From Complexity to Food Security Decision-Support: Novel Methods of Assessment and Their Role in Enhancing the Timeliness and Relevance of Food and Nutrition Security Information. Global Food Security, 2013, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 41–49.
  24. Escamilla R. Can Experience-based Household Food Security Scales Help Improve Food Security Governance? Global Food Security, 2012, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 120–125.
  25. Cassman K. What do We Need to Know about Global Food Security? Global Food Security, 2012, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 81–82.
  26. Soumaré I. International Capital Markets and Redundant Securities. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2006, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 1037–1050.
  27. Hairault J., Langot F. Inequality and Social Security Reforms. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2008, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 386–410.
  28. MacLean L., Sanegre R., Zhao Y., Ziemba W. Capital Growth with Security. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2004, vol. 28, iss. 5, pp. 937–954.
  29. Smyth S., Phillips Р., Kerr W. Food Security and the Evaluation of Risk. Global Food Security, 2015, vol. 4, pp. 16–23.
  30. Badami M., Ramankutty N. Urban Agriculture and Food Security: A Critique Based on an Assessment of Urban Land Constraints. Global Food Security, 2015, vol. 4, pp. 8–15.
  31. Enenkel M., See L., Bonifacio R. et al. Drought and Food Security – Improving Decision-Support via New Technologies and Innovative Collaboration. Global Food Security, 2015, vol. 4, pp. 51–55.
  32. Dijk M., Meijerink G. A Review of Global Food Security Scenario and Assessment Studies: Results, Gaps and Research Priorities. Global Food Security, 2014, vol. 3, iss. 3-4, pp. 227–238.
  33. Fanzo J. Ethical Issues for Human Nutrition in the Context of Global Food Security and Sustainable Development. Global Food Security, 2015, vol. 7, pp. 15–23.
  34. Ittersum M., Giller K. The First International Conference on Global Food Security – A Synthesis. Global Food Security, 2014, vol. 3, iss. 3-4, pp. 119–124.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive