Zvyagin A.A.Tsentr Central Research and Development Institute for Shipbuilding Industry, Moscow, Russian Federation amateracu13@rambler.ru
Importance Considering crisis phenomena in the national economy, it becomes especially important to focus on countering the social criminalization among top management of entities, which are strategically important for Russia's security. Objectives The research finds methods to set up a system for governmental control over top executives of publicly important enterprises as an institutional mechanism for ensuring Russia's economic security. Methods The research employs econometric methods, analyzes the state of personnel security among top management of publicly important enterprises so to determine an effective system for governmental control over top management in the enterprises. Results The article presents a formula to qualify entities as strategically important for Russia's security. It also indicates the key principle of the proposed governmental mechanism, and practical steps for setting governmental control over top management in the enterprises. I propose a mechanism to finance the process of setting up a government control system at the preparation stage and during its initial operation. Conclusions and Relevance Government control over top executives is a starting point for managing the security of entities, which have the strongest influence on the national security.
Keywords: counteraction, social criminalization, personnel management
References:
Galbraith J.K. The Economics of Innocent Fraud: Truth for Our Time. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2004, pp. 41–48, 83.
Fedotova V.G. Neklassicheskie modernizatsii i al'ternativy modernizatsionnoi teorii [Non-classical improvement and alternatives to the modernization theory]. Voprosy filosofii= Issues of Philosophy, 2002, no. 12, pp. 3–21.
Shmelev N.P. Rossiya i mirovoi krizis: nazrevshie peremeny [Russia and the global crisis: necessary changes]. Sovremennaya Evropa= Contemporary Europe, 2009, no. 3, pp. 5–15.
Zvyagin A.A. Prognoz razvitiya Russkoi tsivilizatsii [The forecast of the Russian civilization development]. Initsiativy XXI veka= Initiatives of the XXI Century, 2010, no. 3, pp. 47–52.
Crozier M., Friedberg E. Actors and Systems: the Politics of Collective Action. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Schumpeter J. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007, 864 p.
Krylova A.A., Esipov V.M., Kolesnikov V.V., Latov Yu.V. Chto takoe 'kriminalizatsiya ekonomiki Rossii' i kak s nei borot'sya [What is the criminalization of the Russian economy and how should it be countered?]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2011, 631 p.
Latov Yu.V., Latova N.V., Nikolaeva S.I. Povsednevnaya tenevaya ekonomika i natsional'naya ekonomicheskaya mental'nost' v postsovetskoi Rossii [Routine shadow economy and national economic mentality in post-Soviet Russia]. Moscow, Bukinist Publ., 2005, 140 p.
Olson M. Logika kollektivnykh deistvii: Obshchestvennye blaga i teoriya grupp [The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups]. Moscow, Fond ekonomicheskoi initsiativy Publ., 1995, 165 p.
Eggertsson T. Ekonomicheskoe povedenie i instituty [Economic Behavior and Institutions]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2001, 179 p.
North D. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance]. Moscow, Nachala Publ., 1997, p. 12.
Grzegoczyk F. Zasady i tryb doboru kandydatow do rad nadzorczych spolek akcyjnych. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 2010, no. 816, pp. 73–89.
Perkins J. Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., 2004, p. 275.
Storey J. New Perspectives on Human Resource Management. London, Cengage Learning, 1999, p. 26.
