+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

International protectionism policy in developing new energy technologies

Vol. 11, Iss. 46, DECEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 5 August 2015

Accepted: 12 August 2015

Available online: 17 December 2015

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-12

Ratner S.V. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
lanarat@mail.ru

Iosifov V.V. Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
iosifov@kubstu.ru

Importance The world practice of technology diffusion indicates that high-tech sectors can dynamically evolve not only due to implementing national scientific developments, but also due to calling in companies that are the leaders of high-tech production for opening joint ventures and subsidiaries. The level of high-tech production localization is a critical point.
     Objectives This research examines protectionist practices various WTO member countries use to accelerate energy technologies diffusion (wind energy case). The legislative aspects of introducing a production localization index are analyzed, as well as positive and negative effects of this practice.
     Methods This research draws upon a bibliographical analysis, statistical analysis, comparative analysis, and case studies.
     Results Localization threshold introduction has both positive and negative effects the article describes.
     Conclusions and Relevance The major wind potential of Russia and the high-volume domestic market as well as a high level of development of related industries such as metallurgy, rare earth production, energy mechanical engineering, allow assuming that introducing a threshold localization index will be an economically justifiable stimulus for the development of the national wind energy engineering.

Keywords: localization index, wind energy, power engineering, investment

References:

  1. 2012 Wind Technologies Market Report. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Washington D.C., US, 2013, 92 p.
  2. Global Wind 2006 Report, GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2007, 60 p.
  3. Global Wind 2008 Report. GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2009, 60 p.
  4. Global Wind 2009 Report. GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2010, 68 p.
  5. Global Wind Report. Annual Market Update 2010. GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2011, 72 p.
  6. Global Wind Report. Annual Market Update 2011. GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2012, 68 p.
  7. Global Wind Report. Annual Market Update 2012. GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2013, 72 p.
  8. Global Wind Report. Annual Market Update 2013. GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2014, 80 p.
  9. Global Wind Report. Annual Market Update 2014. GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2015, 80 p.
  10. Ratner S.V., Iosifov V.V. Perspektivy razvitiya solnechnoi energetiki v Rossii: stoimostnoi analiz [Prospects for the solar energy development in Russia: a cost analysis]. Vestnik Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Ser. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management, 2014, no. 4, pp. 52–62.
  11. Mabee W.E., Mannion J., Carpenter T. Comparing the Feed-in Tariff Incentives for Renewable Electricity in Ontario and Germany. Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 40, pp. 480–489.
  12. Zhao Z.Y., Zuo J., Fan L.L., Zillante G. Impacts of Renewable Energy Regulations on the Structure of Power Generation in China – a Critical Analysis. Renewable Energy, 2011, vol. 36, iss. 1, pp. 24–30.
  13. Hu Z., Wang J., Byrne J., Kurdgelashvili L. Review of Wind Power Tariff Policies in China. Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 53, pp. 41–50.
  14. Lo K. A Critical Review of China Rapidly Developing Renewable Energy and Energy Policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, vol. 29, pp. 508–516.
  15. Ratner S.V. Issledovanie vozmozhnostei vstraivaniya rossiiskikh predpriyatii v global'nye tekhnologicheskie tsepochki naukoemkikh proizvodstv (na primere vetroenergetiki) [Examining the possibilities of integrating the Russian enterprises into the global technological chains of knowledge-intensive industries (a wind energy case)]. Innovatsii = Innovation, 2014, no. 9, pp. 15–20.
  16. Carley S., Miller C.J. Regulatory Stringency and Policy Drivers: A Reassessment of Renewable Portfolio Standards. Policy Studies Journal, 2012, vol. 40, iss. 4, pp. 730–756.
  17. Wang Z., Qin H., Lewis J.I. China's Wind Power Industry: Policy Support, Technological Achievements, and Emerging Challenges. Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 51, pp. 80–88.
  18. Wang B. Can the CDM Bring Technology Transfer to Developing Countries? An Empirical Study of Technology Transfers in China’s CDM Projects. GCD Working Paper, 2009, no. 2.
  19. Lewis J., Ryan W. Fostering a Renewable Energy Technology Industry. Environmental Energy Technologies Division. Ernesto Orlando Lawrence, Berkeley National Laboratory, 2005.
  20. Schuman S., Lin A. China's Renewable Energy Law and Its Impact on Renewable Power in China: Progress, Challenges and Recommendations for Improving Implementation. Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 51, pp. 89–109.
  21. Nuttall W.J., Manz D.L. A New Energy Security Paradigm for the Twenty-First Century. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2008, vol. 75, iss. 8, pp. 1247–1259.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive