+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Falsification of the results of World War II as part of the information campaign against Russia

Vol. 11, Iss. 25, JULY 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 15 April 2015

Accepted: 14 May 2015

Available online: 10 July 2015

Subject Heading: THREATS AND SECURITY

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 50-63

Morozov Yu.V. Institute of Far East Studies, Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russian Federation
morozovyury51@yandex.ru

Importance In 2015, the global community holds massive celebrations of the 70th anniversary after the anti-German coalition won the Nazi Germany and militarist Japan. However, advocates of the unipolar world have their own interests to diminish the role of Russia in international affairs as part of a new interpretation of the results of the World War II, thus transforming Russia's image from the Winner State into the aggressor. The results of World War II are falsified actively and continuously as part of the information campaign against Russia.
     Objectives The article pursues demonstrating that World War II has not yet become a page in the dim and distant past for many nations, and its outcome still influences the contemporary geopolitical processes. That is the reason for uncovering those who falsify the history and cast doubts on lessons and results of World War II.
     Methods I investigate the contemporary formats and methods used to distort the results of World War II. The article presents an in-depth analysis of those who may benefit from such falsification. I apply broad factual materials and compare original researches, perform the content analysis of monographs and articles by the leading historians. The research uses a horizontal comparative analysis.
     Results Relying upon historical facts of the World War II history, I display the real contribution the Red Army and the anti-German coalition allies made to batter the Nazi Germany and Japanese militarism.
     Conclusions and Relevance I conclude that the current information campaign distorts historical facts of World War II as its main ideas and purpose. The research unveils the main purpose of historical falsifiers, i.e. to distort the truth so to keep the unipolar world, gradually destroy the fundamentals of the multipolar world. I disclose concepts of the falsifiers, which regard the communism idea of the total social equality with the idea of racial supremacy followed by the National Socialism supporters on equal terms. As a conclusion, I call the Russian experts and foreign analysts for protecting the true history of World War II from falsifications. The truth should be convincingly told to today's generations of people living all over the world. Doing this complicated and painstaking work, we contribute to the future of the entire humankind.

Keywords: World War II, Red Army, anti-German coalition, front, attack, defense, losses

References:

  1. Dugarzhav L. Front Tsegmid – simvol vechnoi i nerushimoi druzhby narodov Mongolii i Rossii [The front of Tsegmid is a symbol of eternal and indestructible friendship of the peoples of Mongolia and Russia]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2012, no. 22, pp. 56–64.
  2. Morozov Yu.V. Vliyanie voennoi politiki SShA na obespechenie stabil'nosti v Tsentral'noi Azii i na natsional'nye interesy Rossii v regione [Influence of the USA military policy on providing stability in Central Asia and the Russian national interests in the region]. Rossiya i Amerika v 21 veke, 2010, no. 2, pp. 21–34. (In Russ.) Available at: Link.
  3. Rossiya i SSSR v voinakh XX veka. Poteri vooruzhennykh sil. Statisticheskoe issledovanie [Russia and the USSR in the wars of the 20th century. Losses of armed forces. A statistical research]. Moscow, Olma-Press Publ., 2001, pp. 347–349.
  4. Sukharev Yu. Sovremennye fal'sifikatsii istorii Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny [Modern falsification of the history of the Great Patriotic War]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  5. Baldwin N. Battles Lost and Won. Great Campaigns of World War II. New York, Harper & Row, 1966.
  6. Jacobsen H., Dollinger H. Der Zweite Weltkrieg in Bildern und Dokumenten. Bd. 4. Die Ausweitung zum Weltkrieg 1941-42. München, 1968.
  7. Kosachenko N.A., Berezovskii I.E., Starodubtsev D.M. K voprosu o fal'sifikatsii istorii Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny v zapadnykh SMI [On the issue of falsifying the history of the Great Patriotic War by the Western mass media]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  8. Lavrenov S.Ya., Popov I.M. Krakh Tret'ego reikha [The collapse of the Third Reich]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2000, pp. 301–302.
  9. Shishkin I. Fal'sifikatsiya istorii i interesy rossiiskoi elity [Falsification of history and the Russian elite’s interests]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.) (accessed 10.06.2011)
  10. Pavlovets Yu. Fal'sifikatsiya istorii Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny kak instrument bor'by s Russkim mirom [Falsification of the history of the Great Patriotic War as an instrument of struggle against the Russian world]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.) (accessed 23.12.2014)
  11. Mikryukov V.Yu. Traditsii i innovatsii v voenno-patrioticheskom obrazovanii uchashchikhsya v sovremennoi Rossii: monografiya [Tradition and innovation in the military and patriotic education of students in modern Russia: a monograph]. Moscow, Academy of Military Sciences Publ., 2005, 166 p.
  12. Smith R. Ot ‘Da’ k ‘Net’: kak amerikanskaya diplomatiya prevratila Rossiyu iz potentsial'nogo soyuznika v strategicheskogo protivnika [From Da to Nyet: How U.S. Diplomacy Helped Transform Russia from Potential Ally into Strategic Adversary]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.) (accessed 16.12.2014)
  13. Karacharov I. Russkaya vintovka [Russian rifle]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.) (accessed 17.06.2006)
  14. Urazova S.A. Osobennosti organizatsii bankovskoi deyatel'nosti na territorii SSSR v period Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny [The specifics of banking in the USSR during the Great Patriotic War]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2009, no. 47, pp. 81–91.
  15. Cheskidov B.M. Finansovoe obespechenie Pobedy v Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine [Financial support for the Victory in the Great Patriotic War]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2010, no. 23, pp. 75–79.
  16. Sherwood R. Ruzvel't i Gopkins glazami ochevidtsa [Roosevelt and Hopkins: an intimate history]. Moscow, Inostrannaya literatura Publ., 1958, pp. 619–620.
  17. Urlanis B.Ts. Istoriya voennykh poter' [The history of military losses]. St. Petersburg, Poligon Publ., 1994, pp. 228–232.
  18. Aksenenko S. Velikaya lozh' o Velikoi voine [Great lie about the Great War]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  19. Gareev M.A. Svyashchennyi dolg nashei pamyati [The sacred duty of our memory]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2010, no. 20, pp. 2–6.
  20. Gareev M.A. Man'chzhurskaya strategicheskaya nastupatel'naya operatsiya 1945 goda [The Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation in 1945]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  21. Gareev M.A. Rossiya v voinakh XX veka [Russia in the wars of the 20th century]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive