Davletshin T.G.OOO Burovye i Neftepromyslovye Nasosy (Oil-rig and oilfield pumps), Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation email@example.com ORCID id: not available
Importance The article studies problems of transition from VAT to GST and related changes in the imperfect conceptual apparatus. It also considers common errors in the interpretation of VAT and their resolution during the transition to GST. Objectives The author analyses disadvantages of the VAT existing legislation and methods of their elimination in the transition to GST. Methods The study draws on general scientific approaches and methods. Results The author states the necessity of renaming the object in accordance with international practices – “tax on goods and services”. Conclusions and Relevance Despite the name, VAT is a tax on final consumption and needs renaming. The transition from VAT to GST requires considerable changes in the conceptual apparatus. It eliminates the basic contradiction of Chapter 21 of the Internal Revenue Code and defines the taxation object. This leads to creation of a logical and coherent document. Economic payer of the GST is the end user. Entrepreneurs promoting the goods (works, services) become tax agents. The role of invoices shall be allocation of the consumption tax. The Purchaser shall pay the GST as a tax or the amount of tax deduction.
Shelkunov A.D. [Realization of the VAT neutrality principle in Russia in light of new explanations of еру ОECD]. Zakon, 2012, no. 7, pp. 124–131. (In Russ.)
Tufetulov A.M., Davletshin T.G., Sinnikova Yu.M. [Features of added value tax calculation in taxation system for agrarian producers]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava = Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2013, no. 1, pp. 184–188. (In Russ.) URL: https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.07.2013.1.184-188
Tufetulov A., Davletshin T., Sinnikova Yu. [On the real VAT rate on realization of goods, labour and srvices]. Nalogovyi Vestnik, 2013, no. 12, pp. 42–50. (In Russ.)
Ruchkina G.F., Terekhova E.V. [General and controversial aspects of legal regulation of the value added tax]. Yuridicheskii mir, 2014, no. 1, pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)
Panskov V.G. [VAT taxation problems]. Nalogovyi Vestnik, 2003, no. 5, pp. 31–33. (In Russ.)
Tufetulov A.M., Davletshin T.G., Salmina S. [Analysis of impact of special regime on financial results of small business]. Nalogovyi Vestnik, 2014, no. 10, pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)
Troshin A.V. [Comparative analysis of determining methods of tax burden on enterprises]. Finansy = Finance, 2000, no. 5, pp. 44–54. (In Russ.)
Chesnokova L.A., Yashina N.I. [The Tax Burden in the Russian Federation Agricultural Sector and the Need to Change it]. Finansy i upravlenie = Finance and Management, 2016, no. 2, pp. 118–124. (In Russ.) URL: https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-7802.2016.2.16993
Kazakova M., Knobel' A., Sokolov I. Kachestvo administrirovaniya NDS v stranakh OESR i Rossii. Reformirovanie rossiiskoi sistemy vzimaniya naloga [The VAT administration quality in the OECD countries. Reformation of the Russian taxation system]. Moscow, GIEP Publ., 2010, 128 p. URL: https://www.iep.ru/files/text/working_papers/134.pdf
Panskov V.G. [VAT performance: there are reserves, but the opportunities are not captured]. Finansy = Finance, 2016, no. 3, pp. 22–27. (In Russ.)
Gurvich E.T., Suslina A.L. [Tax Collection Trends in Russia: Macroeconomic Approach]. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2015. № 4. S. 22–33. URL: http://www.eeg.ru/files/lib/02092015.pdf (In Russ.)
Gorskii I.V. [Tax policy in Russia at the beginning of the 21st century]. Nalogovyi vestnik, 2007, no. 7, pp. 9–13. (In Russ.)
Sinel'nikov S. et al. Problemy nalogovoi sistemy Rossii: teoriya, opyt, reforma [Taxation problems in Russia: theory, experience, reform]. M.: GIEP Publ., 2000.
Demin A.V. [The Certainty of Taxation as a Fundamental Principle of the Tax Law]. Voprosy pravovedeniya = Issues of Jurisprudence, 2012, no. 1, pp. 158–173. (In Russ.)