Anureev S.V.Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation email@example.com
Subject The article analyzes various ways to finance the Moscow Metro. Objectives The aim is to search for additional financial sources under reduction in budgetary revenues and the need to continue building new stations and lines. Methods The key analysis of the methodology is an analysis of best practices in the context of various theories as alternatives to taxation and budgetary subsidies. Results The paper considers major concepts of the Moscow Metro financing, i.e. budgetary subsidies by means of taxes; fee-based public services, user charges and cost allocation to end-users; fiscal monopoly; and additional budgetary revenue generation. I analyze other concepts, like low fares as a social benefit, prohibitive tariffs to prevent excessive migration of unskilled laborers, public transport privatization, and premium charges for the benefit of private investors. The analysis unveiled that 3/4 of real transportation costs the Moscow Metro covers from the city budget. Conclusions Budgetary subsidies result in increased taxation of skilled labor and growing migration of low paid employees. This impairs the structure of the city economy, and adversely affects industries producing high-added value product. Low rates falsify budgetary social support, as mainly shadow economy employees and labor migrants benefit from them. The Moscow Metro is a classical fiscal monopoly; tariffs should be increased only on a case-by-case basis and only for the metro.
Keywords: public finance, public transport tariff, user charges, migration, fiscal monopoly
Kuznetsova K.V., Popova E.V., Shilova N.V. Gorodskoi obshchestvennyi transport v razvitykh stranakh: osobennosti organizatsii i sposoby finansirovaniya [Urban public transport in developed countries: features of organization and financing methods]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economics Journal, 2013, no. 2, pp 111–117, no. 3, pp. 86–90.
Biryukov V.V., Lerman E.B. Razvitie gorodskogo passazhirskogo transporta v usloviyakh modernizatsii rossiiskoi ekonomiki [The urban transport development under the Russian economy modernization]. Vestnik Sibirskoi gosudarstvennoi avtomobil'no-dorozhnoi akademii = Vestnik SibADI, 2011, no. 21, pp. 55–59.
Dem'yanenko V.N., Kurbatov A.V. Aktual'nye voprosy finansirovaniya perevozok l'gotnykh kategorii passazhirov na avtomobil'nom transporte Moskovskoi oblasti [Current issues of financing the reduced-fare passenger transportation by road transport of the Moscow oblast]. Vestnik universiteta = University Bulletin (State University of Management), 2015, no. 1, pp. 177–184.
Robin Carruthers, Malise Dick, Anuja Saurkar. Affordability of Urban Public Transport in Developing Countries. The World Bank Group, Transport Papers, 2005, no. TP-3. Available at: http://urlid.ru/af5u.
Robert Cervero. State Roles in Providing Affordable Mass Transport Services for Low-Income Residents. International Transport Forum, Discussion Paper, 2011, no. 17. Available at: http://urlid.ru/af5t.
Subsidies and the Social Costs and Benefits of Public Transport. Centre for International Economics, Canberra & Sydney, March 2001. Available at: http://urlid.ru/aesm.
Shanova S.E. Investitsii na avtomobil'nom transporte [Investments in road transport]. St. Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Publ., 2011, 184 p.
Fisher R. State and Local Public Finance. South-Western College Pub., 003rd edition, 2006.
Duvall T., Basso J. Proposal 9: Funding Transportation Infrastructure with User Fees. New Sources of Revenue and Efficiency, The Hamilton Project. Available at: http://urlid.ru/aeso.
Leape J. User Charges – A Reassessment. In: Fair Tax: Towards a Modern Tax System (Wales C. (ed.)). The Smith Institute, UK, London, 2008.
Chekin V.D. Evolyutsiya sistemy mestnykh finansov v SShA [The evolution of the system of local finances in the USA]. Ekonomicheskii vestnik universiteta = Economic Bulletin of Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi State Pedagogical University named after Hryhoriy Skovoroda, 2015, no. 24, pp. 165–169.
Solyannikova S.P. Upravlenie gosudarstvennymi finansami: zayavlennye printsipy i real'nost' [Managing the public finance: declared principles and reality]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2014, no. 4, pp. 44–59.
Leont'ev Yu.V., Maiburov I.A. Sovershenstvovanie fiskal'nykh instrumentov, svyazannykh s ekspluatatsiei avtotransportnykh sredstv [Improving the fiscal instruments related to motor vehicles operation]. Izvestiya Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii = Izvestiya of Irkutsk State Economics Academy, 2015, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 471–479.
Yakovleva N.V. Aktsiz i fiskal'naya monopoliya: istoriya vozniknoveniya i perspektivy primeneniya [Excise duty and fiscal monopoly: history and prospects for application]. Moscow, Kompaniya Sputnik Publ., 2004, 126 p.
Larina O.G. Teoriya gosudarstvennykh dokhodov i fiskal'nykh prerogativ Speranskogo M.M.: problemy opredeleniya i klassifikatsii [The theory of public revenues and fiscal prerogatives by M.M. Speransky: problems of definition and classification]. Nalogi i finansovoe pravo = Tax and Financial Law, 2010, no. 3, pp. 223–226.
Dodlova M.Ch., Kisel'gof S.G., Menyashev R.Sh., Sorokin K.S., Khmel'nitskaya E.A., Cherchina E.M. Tarify na obshchestvennyi transport i modelirovanie sprosa (na primere prigorodnogo zheleznodorozhnogo soobshcheniya moskovskogo regiona) [Public transport fares and modeling the demand: the suburban trains of the Moscow region case]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2013, no. 6, pp. 100–119.
Petrov A.I., Ignatyunin V.A. Differentsirovannye tarify na gorodskom obshchestvennom transporte. Mirovoi opyt i vozmozhnost' ego ispol'zovaniya v rossiiskikh usloviyakh [Differentiated tariffs for urban public transport. World experience and the possibility of its use in Russia]. Transport Urala = Transport of the Urals, 2013, no. 3, pp. 46–52.