+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Result-oriented planning as a tool to increase the efficiency of budget outlays

Vol. 21, Iss. 48, DECEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 29 September 2015

Accepted: 19 October 2015

Available online: 27 December 2015

Subject Heading: BUDGET REGULATION

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 22-34

Masterov A.I. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
andrey-masterov@yandex.ru

Subject The unstable economic situation leads to price reduction for energy resources and increased pressure on the Russian budget. It is crucial to enhance the efficiency of budget outlays. Result-oriented budgeting may serve as a tool to solve this problem.
     Objectives The study’s objectives are to disclose the role of program-based approaches in budget outlays optimization, to review foreign practice of using special-purpose programs, to describe methods and analytical procedures used in the process of substantiating the optimal alternatives for budget expenditures.
     Methods I apply the systems analysis methods to show possible solutions to increase the efficiency of budget outlays.
     Results The article shows the role of special-purpose programs in budget expenditure planning, the immaturity of the Russian methodology of result-oriented budgeting and its ineptitude to solve the problems of budget expenditure optimization. Based on the reviewed foreign experience, I present a list of analytical procedures to apply them within the cost-benefit analysis. I also provide recommendations on implementing similar approaches in the Russian practice of result-oriented budgeting.
     Conclusions To increase the efficiency of budget expenditures using the program-based approach, it is necessary to develop and implement analytical methods, which enable to search for optimal alternatives of budget outlays realization.

Keywords: program-based budget, government program, optimality principle, planning, management

References:

  1. Ponkratov V.V. Antikrizisnyi plan i byudzhetnyi manevr 2015 [The anti-recessionary plan and a budget maneuver 2015]. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta = Bulletin of Financial University, 2015, no. 2, pp. 70–75.
  2. Belenchuk A.A., Eroshkina L.A., Prokof'ev S.E., Sidorenko E.E., Siluanov A.G., Afanas'ev M.P. Programmnyi byudzhet: luchshaya praktika [Program-based budget as the best practice]. Nauchno-issledovatels'kii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2011, no. 1, pp. 5–22.
  3. Alekhin B.I. Vedomstvennye tselevye programmy [Departmental special-purpose programs]. Nauchno-issledovatels'kii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2010, no. 4, pp. 5–14.
  4. Afanas'ev M.P., Alekhin B.I., Kravchenko A.I., Kradinov P.G. Programmnyi byudzhet: tseli, klassifikatsiya i printsipy postroeniya [A program-based budget: purposes, classification and building principles]. Nauchno-issledovatels'kii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2010, no. 3, pp. 5–18.
  5. Kapyrin D.A. Zarubezhnyi opyt programmno-tselevogo byudzhetirovaniya i ego primenenie [Foreign experience in result-oriented budgeting and its application]. Finansovaya ekonomika = Financial Economics, 2013, no. 3-4, pp. 45–58.
  6. Kantorovich L.V. Matematicheskie metody organizatsii i planirovaniya proizvodstva [Mathematical methods of production organization and planning]. Leningrad, LSU Publ., 1939, 67 p.
  7. Kantorovich L.V. Ekonomicheskii raschet nailuchshego ispol'zovaniya resursov [Economical calculation of the best use of resources]. Moscow, AS of USSR Publ., 1959, 344 p.
  8. Novozhilov V.V. Problemy izmereniya zatrat i rezul'tatov pri optimal'nom planirovanii [Problems of measuring costs and results in optimal planning]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1972, 432 p.
  9. Dantzig G. Lineinoe programmirovanie, ego primeneniya i obobshcheniya [Linear Programming and Extensions]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1966, 600 p.
  10. Afanas'ev M.P., Shash N.N. Instrumentarii otsenki effektivnosti byudzhetnykh program [Tools to assess the efficiency of budgetary programs]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues, 2013, no. 3, pp. 48–69.
  11. Udovenko A.N. Perekhod k programmnomu byudzhetu: rezul'taty, problemy, perspektivy [Transition to program-based budgeting: results, problems, perspectives]. Byudzhet = Budget, 2012, no. 6, pp. 32–34.
  12. Shimshirt N.D. Problemy razrabotki programmnykh byudzhetov kak sovremennoe napravlenie povysheniya effektivnosti byudzhetnoi politiki [Problems related to program-based budget development as a modern trend in increasing the budget policy efficiency]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2011, no. 2, pp. 161–169.
  13. Grishina E.E., Feoktistova O.A. Sistema “tseli – zadachi – pokazateli” osnovnykh instrumentov BOR [The goals – problems – indicators system of the principal instruments of result-oriented budgeting]. Nauchno-issledovatels'kii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2010, no. 4, pp. 87–94.
  14. Rykova I.N., Alaev A.A., Avraamov P.A., Korablev D.V. Otsenka effektivnosti realizatsii gosudarstvennoi programmy “Razvitie promyshlennosti i povyshenie ee konkurentosposobnosti” [Assessing the efficiency of implementation of the government program Developing and Enhancing the Competitiveness of Industry]. Nauchno-issledovatels'kii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2014, no. 2, pp. 15–30.
  15. Solov'eva M.A. Problemy i puti sovershenstvovaniya programmno-tselevogo metoda byudzhetirovaniya v Bryanskoi oblasti [Problems and ways to improve of the result-oriented budgeting method in the Bryansk oblast]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  16. Makarova S.N., Chul'dum N.M. Povyshenie effektivnosti byudzhetnykh raskhodov pri programmno-tselevom byudzhetirovanii [Improving the efficiency of budget expenditures in result-oriented budgeting]. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya = Innovative Economy: Prospects for Development and Improvement, 2013, no. 3, pp. 282–285.
  17. Klimanov V.V., Mikhailova A.A. Vnedrenie programmnogo byudzheta: pervye problemy i voprosy [Introducing the program-based budget: first problems and questions]. Finansy = Finance, 2011, no. 9, pp. 8–10.
  18. Bogacheva O.V., Lavrov A.M., Yastrebova O.K. Mezhdunarodnyi opyt programmnogo byudzhetirovaniya [International experience of program-based budgeting]. Finansy = Finance, 2010, no. 12, pp. 4–14.
  19. Bogacheva O.V., Sidorenko V.V., Yastrebova O.K. Perekhod k programmnomu byudzhetu: problemy i resheniya [Transition to program-based budgeting: problems and solutions]. Nauchno-issledovatels'kii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2012, no. 3, pp. 5–14.
  20. Sokolov I.A., Tishchenko T.V., Khrustalev A.A. Programmno-tselevoe upravlenie byudzhetom: opyt i perspektivy v Rossii [Budget management by results: experience and perspectives in Russia]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2013, 246 p.
  21. Voronkov A.A. Metody analiza i otsenki gosudarstvennykh programm v SShA [Methods to analyze and assess government programs in the USA]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, 188 p.
  22. Mishan E.J., Quah E. Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2007, 336 p.
  23. Giffin R.B., Giffin M.F. Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Primer for Community Health Workers. The Community Health Worker Evaluation Tool Kit. Washington, Health Care Strategy Associates, Inc., 2006.
  24. Johannesson M. Theory and Methods of Economic Evaluation of Health Care. Amsterdam, Kluwer, 1996.
  25. Pearce D., Atkinson G., Mourato S. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. Paris, OECD, 2006, 318 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive